We use this solution for the antivirus to secure our PCs and server rooms.
SAP Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The performance could be better, but the functionality is good
Pros and Cons
- "As far as it functions, it works fine."
- "It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
As far as it functions, it works fine.
From a technical standpoint, they are good and it's functional, but improvements are needed.
What needs improvement?
It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance.
We need better performance. A lightweight solution without affecting the performance of the computer would be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for 14 years.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I don't have any issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution. We have approximately 200 users in our organization.
We have plans to increase our usage.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is okay. I don't have any issues with them.
How was the initial setup?
I was not involved in the installation but seems to be straightforward.
We have three people to manage this solution for our organization. The team is made up of two engineers and one manager.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licensing fees are paid annually.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution but the performance needs to be improved.
I would rate this solution a four out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Provides good visibility of the endpoint; cloud management was somewhat difficult
Pros and Cons
- "It provides good security."
- "There were issues with the cloud management."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case was for endpoint security.
What is most valuable?
As much as the solution is an endpoint product, it provided good security. When you logged in, you could actually see all the things that were happening on your endpoint and that was a benefit.
What needs improvement?
I had issues with the cloud management of this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used this solution for about a year and recently switched to a different solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution was stable but it crashed the application sometimes. As much as it's an endpoint security, I think it should be intelligent enough to know which applications are secure and which are not.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using this solution but we recently switched to Sophos.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is quite straightforward. It took a few minutes, but the solution is complex to manage because as much as it was cloud-based, the machines in our environment meant that when you wanted to uninstall or remove an appliance from the portal, it was a bit hectic. The portal would say it's been removed but your machine didn't agree with that. We had about 50 users of the product and one engineer dealing with maintenance.
What other advice do I have?
I think the solution is suitable for a mid-size organization but not for enterprise size companies that need endpoint security.
I rate Kaspersky a seven out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
Support ensures ongoing protection while needs for enhanced data leakage safeguards arise
Pros and Cons
- "Installation and deployment through the Kaspersky Security Center is straightforward and efficient, taking minimal time to complete."
What is our primary use case?
At this moment, our company is using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because we have situations related to culture and cost considerations.
We use almost all modules on Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, including antivirus, anti-ransomware, behavior analytics via the Kaspersky Security Cloud.
I use Kaspersky's centralized management console for overseeing security in my network.
How has it helped my organization?
Installation and deployment of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is very easy.
We deploy via the Kaspersky Security Center.
Provisioning from the Kaspersky Security Center takes a very short time and is not complex.
What is most valuable?
What I appreciate about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is that it is very familiar to us.
I would assess the effectiveness of Kaspersky's advanced threat defense measures and firewall positively.
Installation and deployment through the Kaspersky Security Center is straightforward and efficient, taking minimal time to complete.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business regarding Data Leakage Prevention (DLP). Additional features such as application control or device control could benefit from applying AI to improve the solution's performance.
Encryption tools are generally good, but they can be complicated for users who are not familiar with technology.
Regarding patch management, we utilize another product to help minimize risk.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for seven years.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jul 14, 2025
Flag as inappropriatePS & Technical Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Easy to set up and implement, but the threat intelligence features are outdated
Pros and Cons
- "The setup and implementation are easy."
- "The threat intelligence features are not up to date."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is used as an antivirus for protection.
What is most valuable?
The setup and implementation are easy.
What needs improvement?
The threat intelligence features are not up to date.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable. We have five customers.
How was the initial setup?
The setup depends on the solutions. If we use it with normal solutions, it takes ten minutes. If we use it with VMware or other infrastructure like Hyper-V, it will require additional effort.
What other advice do I have?
We are partners. The tool must update its signature, threat intelligence features, and IoC. The signature is not sufficient. It is not authentic. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Product Categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Endpoint Compliance Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Extended Detection and Response (XDR)Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Fortinet FortiEDR
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
IBM Security QRadar
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Defender XDR
Elastic Security
Fortinet FortiClient
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Trend Vision One
Symantec Endpoint Security
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which endpoint solution is more effective in terms of protection and remote administration: Sophos Intercept X or Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- Which EPP solution to choose for a university: Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
- When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the best way to trial endpoint protection solutions?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?














