Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

I like the security that this solution provides. It not only protects against the outside world, but it also protects against careless users. We do have users who make careless mistakes in the operation, but the system protects them from their attacks, and we can easily identify and follow up on the problem.

The performance could be better.

We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for ten years.

It's a server-based application.

We are using the latest version. We update it daily.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is reliable, but it can be resource-intensive at times.

We have approximately 130 users in our organization.

We used technical support about once a year on average.

There are some issues with the configuration, but it is still very good, and the impact on general use operations is minimal.

The installation is a little complicated and can take a long time, and it requires a policy for our internal control.

The installation requires an experienced user.

We have two mechanical team members to maintain this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for protecting our information.

The solution is secure.

There are times when Microsoft Windows's antivirus called Defender interferes with the functionality of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There should be better integration with Windows.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately six years.

We are having some stability issues but we have been using the solution for a long time and we have not had any issues until now. Once this issue is fixed we expect it to work well in the future.

We have approximately 90 people using the solution in my organization.

We have had some issues with the solution and we have contacted support and they have resolved them.

The installation takes half an hour to complete.

I did the implementation of the solution and we have five engineers that handle the maintenance.

There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a six out of ten.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for network protection. It does monitoring and can detect intrusions and viruses. Additionally, we use it for log management.

There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well.

When I do a malware scan on my computer it takes a long while. This process could improve in the future. Additionally, the security could improve.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately three years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a stable solution.

We have approximately 24,000 users are using this solution.

We have not needed to contact the support because we have not had any issues.

We have a department that handles all the implementation and maintenance of the solution.

There is an annual license required.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for many purposes. We mainly use it for protection against malware. Additionally, we perform a lot of administration for users using the application, device, and web controls.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a very powerful tool for us. We use a lot of third-party software that integrates well with the solution.

The solution could improve by providing a cloud service that synchronizes with the on-premise console which would give better connectivity in remote areas.

In a future release, there should be DLP features added.

I have used Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable. However, sometimes when we complete a Windows automatic update we receive the Windows blue screen error prompt. The majority of the time it was because the equipment has updated and the update was not the best one.

The solution has been scalable, we have a lot of different servers.

The technical support is good. We had some difficult problems that were new that took the support some additional time to find a solution. For minor problems, they have been very responsive with their support.

We use many network protection solutions, such as McAfee.

The installation is easy, it can be done with a few clicks of the mouse to install the administration, and from the administrator, you can deploy the solution to the users.

The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need.

I would advise others before implementing this solution to have an organized network. It makes the process a lot easier.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

The Kaspersky Endpoint Security is used for all the workstations in the company.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security protects us against viruses and dangerous software, and it's also great because it has a component that is useful for the deployment of software versions to the end user's computer.

In terms of improvement, we do not use the solution for the servers in most cases because the solution protects us against some software. Hence we have problems installing such software on the server; however, we do some fine-tuning to use this type of software.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is stable.

We are satisfied with the support.

The initial setup of this solution was straightforward.

The licensing is yearly based.

 It is expensive, it could be cheaper, so I think the solution's pricing could be better.

Yes, I would definitely recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Security to other users.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is primarily used to protect my personal information. I use it for security purposes. 

The solution has been very easy to use. It's a user-friendly solution.

The product is very stable.

The scalability of the product is good.

It would be ideal with the solution offered more documentation.

I've used the solution for about two or three years at this point. I'm unsure of the exact amount of time. 

The solution is stable and the performance is good. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

That said, I only use it for personal use, and therefore haven't really attempted to scale it. 

I've never had to reach out to technical support. I haven't had any issues. Therefore, I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive their team is if you do run into problems. 

The installation is very straightforward and simple. It's not overly difficult to set up. A user shouldn't have any issues with the process. 

While I cannot speak to the exact amount of time it took to set up, I recall it being a rather fast process. 

I have the solution deployed to my laptop. I only use it for personal purposes, not for business usage.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I've been pretty happy with its capabilities. 

I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.

The solution is primarily used in order to protect computers. It also helps you avoid issues online.

The solution has been very stable. The performance is good.

The product is quite scalable.

We use it at our enterprise, and it's been extremely beneficial.

We've found the product to be easy to use.

The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of.

I've been using the solution for around two years at this point.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. We don't deal with any types of crashing or freezing.

The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem.

Right now, in our organization, about 25 people use it.

We've never used technical support before. We've never had to call them. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

For an antivirus product, I used to use McAfee. However, I had some information stolen from my computer and therefore I had to change products. It didn't protect me very well. 

I did not handle the installation process. There's another team that manages that aspect of the solution. Therefore, I can't comment directly on how easy or difficult it was to implement.

There is a systems manager that handles any maintenance that may be required.

We had a team that handled it internally.

You do have to pay for a license. We pay a yearly licensing fee. I can't speak to the exact cost, however. 

I'm a customer and an end-user. I do not have a business relationship with Kaspersky.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been quite please with its performance. 

I'd recommend it to other users and organizations.

We use this solution for the antivirus to secure our PCs and server rooms.

As far as it functions, it works fine. 

From a technical standpoint, they are good and it's functional, but improvements are needed.

It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance. 

We need better performance. A lightweight solution without affecting the performance of the computer would be better.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for 14 years.

I don't have any issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.

This is a scalable solution. We have approximately 200 users in our organization.

We have plans to increase our usage.

Technical support is okay. I don't have any issues with them.

I was not involved in the installation but seems to be straightforward.

We have three people to manage this solution for our organization. The team is made up of two engineers and one manager.

Licensing fees are paid annually.

I would recommend this solution but the performance needs to be improved.

I would rate this solution a four out of ten.