Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We use the product as a firewall to provide antivirus and email security. It helps us protect against threats and malware.

The product's most valuable features are automation and central administration. It efficiently identifies and manages vulnerabilities and protects data. Additionally, we can deploy it immediately.

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for six years. At present, we use the latest version.

It is a stable platform. It has fulfilled all the requirements, including email and data protection, web traffic management, add-on filters, web browsing, and ransomware protection. It is working perfectly. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.

The technical support team works well 99.9% of the time. They guided the upgrading and updating of the solution. It addressed a crashing issue with the central console by recommending an upgrade to a specific version. Additionally, when a computer encountered problems after moving to another group, the support team suggested installing updates to resolve the issue.

We used several products before. We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for affordable pricing and better functionality.

The initial setup takes five to ten minutes to complete. If the solution is installed for the first time, it might take a bit longer, i.e., around five minutes, and subsequent installations on existing systems might take around ten minutes.

We can implement the product ourselves.

We purchase the product's yearly license. I rate the pricing five out of ten.

The platform provides a centralized administration system for managing endpoint protection. The business security management features include boosting productivity, anti-spam protection, encryption, etc. It has good analytics and reporting capabilities for tracking threats and security compliance. I rate the product a ten out of ten.

We use the software to secure and defend the network from malicious attacks for endpoints.

It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes.

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for eight or nine years.

It is a stable product.

We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is challenging to scale while working with a large number of users.

The technical support team takes time to respond to the queries. However, their documentation on the website is helpful.

Neutral

We encounter issues while deploying the product if it is not installed properly and requires one executive to work on the process. However, it is easy to maintain.

We purchase the software’s yearly license. It includes support and maintenance updates. The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products.

We evaluated a few similar products. We decided to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as it is more stable, has different defense models, and helps in efficient network supervision.

The product uses a lot of resources for hardware. It is necessary to install and configure the product correctly. I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

I used the solution for signature-based detection, machine learning, threat detection, behavior-based detection, and for the endpoint.

The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics. The solution's reporting capabilities are good. I can generate and schedule custom reports from it. It's helpful and gives us a high, medium, and low-risk-based approach.

Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

I haven’t faced any stability issues with this solution.

The solution’s technical support is okay.

Positive

I have worked with other tools, but I like Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because it gives full endpoint control, including detection, vulnerability management, and file integrity.

The solution fulfilled our needs for the endpoints, including enhanced security and detection for the endpoints.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration.

We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

I have heard from my people that the technical support for the solution is not that good.

Neutral

The solution's initial setup for the endpoints is pretty easy, but it's pretty complicated for the central solution. Deploying all the agents is pretty complicated. I rate the solution’s initial setup a five out of ten.

The solution's deployment took a long time. It took three months for the solution's complete deployment. A security engineer, an infrastructure engineer, and five to six technicians were involved in the solution's deployment.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business helps protect our remote workforce. Some of our users connect to the central office via VPN, and all of them are using Kaspersky. We are currently deploying some rules via Kaspersky on the console. It is getting a little harder for me to perform IT security management tasks. Nowadays, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not that good for malware protection.

The solution's application control feature was pretty good at managing software on our network. We were using it constantly, but it's becoming a little challenging. It's pretty difficult to do because you need a very specific engineer and a lot of tweaking of the firewall rules.

Because of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, we are PCI and ISO 27001 compliant. We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky. Five security engineers and technicians were involved in the solution's maintenance.

I would not recommend the solution to other users because some American and European companies don't work with to work with it.

Overall, I rate the solution a four out of ten.

In my company, we use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, just like how we use Sophos Central and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good.

The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product.

Once you look at the console from the on-premises version, you can see that the GUI mode is very old, meaning you feel like you are dealing with something vintage in nature. The tool's GUI mode is not updated to a new one. Kaspersky should change settings or parameters and make it easy enough for users to create policies since, presently, some difficulties are encountered when creating the policies. The tool needs to change some components in the console to make the product easy to access and configure the policies.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for two years.

There are no bugs in the product. It is a stable solution.

I know about a company that has around 600 users of the solution where I did the configuration.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises model.

Once my company gets the license, we access the URL, after which we use the URL for configuration, license activation, creating agents, and creating the necessary policies, after which we take care of the setup phase for handing over the product to the customer.

The tool is expensive.

To those who plan to use the solution, I would say that we need a dedicated server to deploy the tool in several places.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

We're using it on the endpoint on the user's computer and the servers. We have licenses for workstations and servers. And it's the endpoint security that is the antivirus and the IDS integrated. We also use it to manage some restrictions and web browsing for some users. We allow them to browse some websites and also we restrict some devices and ports.

The firewall is the most valuable feature for us. 

The solution is user-friendly.

It's stable and reliable.

The deployment could be better. Recently when I try to deploy it I received a large number of failures. It is very slow as well.

As an IT analyst, it's easy to use. However, some users don't want to use it as it is more complicated, and due to the firewall, they cannot connect to some websites or other networks. That said, it's still a very good product.

I've been using the solution for five years. 

The solution is stable. It's easy to use. It's reliable and there are no bugs or glitches.

The solution doesn't really scale per se. 

We have two IT specialists and are using it directly. The other users are only end users and there are about 600 of them.

I haven't used support much. I only opened one ticket with them. However, I found the solution myself. Nobody even gave me training and I was able to figure it out. 

We are leaving Kaspersky next year. We will work with Microsoft instead. We'll be using Defender. 

We had trouble deploying the solution as we ended up getting many failures, which was not helpful.

Most of the time, it's from the script I wrote myself, and I used to deploy it before in the previous version. We're using Security Center 13 in the version and it was working fine, and we're still using the same application. At the same time, also with version 13 it's very slow and has a large number of failures. Right now, I'm using another tool to deploy the software to the computer to get around issues.

I am able to manage the solution myself. I manage the server. 

The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee. 

We are a customer and end-user. 

I use it both on-premises and in the cloud. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. We've been mostly happy with the product overall. 

I used the solution to manage the server and push the policies that we had on the computer through the network agent. I also used the tool to remediate from the server the vulnerabilities that were detected. If they were more complicated, I would just go to the computer and try to fix them.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a very good and reliable product. The only reason why we left it was because of the EDR. It is a useful tool for software deployment. The computer used to connect to the server with the public IP, so it was very useful. When the computer is not connected to the VPN, I can use that computer to do the troubleshooting I need to do.

I can use Kaspersky to easily connect to the computer and push the software with the script I created. In the beginning, we used to deploy the OS on computers. After we implemented the Microsoft MDT, we left the deployment. The functionality is still good, but we have another tool for that.

It would be good if Kaspersky could lower the solution's price so people could afford to buy the licenses.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for seven years.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a scalable solution.

I contacted the technical support team only once, and they helped to fix my issue.

Positive

I've heard from my manager that the solution is expensive.

I used to open the security console center every day. When I opened the console, I could see all the issues and vulnerabilities with the antivirus or with the software on the workstations. From there, I could fix them myself or go to the computer and directly fix them. The solution was very clear to understand and manage.

I could easily do everything required by the workstation security, even managing the exceptions in the firewall. I could easily find help from the solution's website.

I would recommend the solution to other users because it's a very good product. People generally look for product quality and price. It would be good if Kaspersky could lower the solution's price so people could afford to buy the licenses.

The firewall was sometimes difficult to manage. Understanding how exactly it works is a bit complicated, and you have to go through the documentation for that.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution provides 24/7 support and EDR. The failure rate is very low. It is customer-friendly.

The solution could provide more frequent updates.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for over 2 years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

The solution’s scalability is great.

4-5 customers are using this solution.

I have used CloudStrike. CloudStrike and Kaspersky have the same features but different use cases depending on the customers.

The initial setup is straightforward, even with a catalog of fifty or ten thousand per client. It's on par with similar solutions in terms of complexity. It takes around three months to deploy completely, depending on the customers.

The solution is worth considering because you don't need one person solely for administration. You can set up Kaspersky for trusted sites or Active Directory, which replaces a full-time administrator. Handling it is easy, but it might seem complex for a regular administrator dealing with customer support and other tasks.

The pricing is good. It has a monthly subscription.

I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

I rate Kaspersky’s ease of management a ten out of ten.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers a distinct advantage regarding reports and data protection. For instance, we opt for active tools if a customer uses multiple security vendors. Transitioning to Kaspersky might require removing or replacing existing solutions, which can be costly.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.