No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
reviewer1134810 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Technology Officer at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reseller
Top 5
Jan 30, 2024
Goes beyond anti-malware and anti-spam but difficulty in achieving optimal performance due to configuration
Pros and Cons
  • "First of all, I like that it's perfect against malware threats and behavior analysis along with signature analysis. That's the key point for me."
  • "First of all, I like that it's perfect against malware threats and behavior analysis along with signature analysis."
  • "I might have the best product in the market. But if it's not properly configured, then I'm losing many of these features. I'm not getting the most out of them. And this is actually one of the biggest challenges that we're facing."
  • "I might have the best product in the market, but if it's not properly configured, then I'm losing many of these features and I'm not getting the most out of them."

What is our primary use case?

Use cases really depend on how you configure it. It's an endpoint security solution that goes beyond anti-malware and anti-spam. It also includes network protection, vulnerability audits, and other features you might need.

What is most valuable?

First of all, I like that it's perfect against malware threats and behavior analysis along with signature analysis. That's the key point for me. Another thing I value is the alarm support with EDR active. It helps me root cause issues and detect suspicious behavior.

What needs improvement?

Most companies aren't familiar with Kaspersky's MDR offering. Everyone's talking about XDR and MDR solutions now, and Kaspersky mainly offers EDR. I believe they should consider more advanced solutions, especially for ransomware protection and similar critical threats. They might have these solutions, but our provider might not be giving us proper insights. Again, it's possible these features exist, but our reseller isn't making us aware. 

In future releases, I would like to see a few things. First, I'd like a centralized view for managing security across a large organization with multiple offices. 

Second, some built-in solutions can alert IT about suspicious behavior before any damage occurs, like applications sending unusual emails or data alerts.

I want to add that performance needs to be considered. Security doesn't require ongoing configuration. My crucial point is whether the solution, with my configuration from six months ago, still provides adequate security. In terms of support,  I was thinking of a managed security service provider because security isn't our primary business, and we lack the necessary skills to manage it ourselves. We rely on others to do it.

We lack the skills and need a third-party provider with expertise. So, we have a third party that can provide managed security services and keep me updated on the latest products and practices. I just need to be confident we're using the best available solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for more than five years now. I've experience with this product but with an advanced license.

Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution. But there are better solutions, or perhaps upgrades might be better.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a highly scalable solution. We are an enterprise business, so we have around a thousand end users. 

How are customer service and support?

I receive support from our reseller at Kaspersky.

How was the initial setup?

I would rate my experience with the initial setup a seven out of ten, with one being difficult and ten being easy.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment process needs an expert, so it takes hours to configure all the features properly. It's not a quick process.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because, again, I might have the best product in the market. But if it's not properly configured, then I'm losing many of these features. I'm not getting the most out of them. And this is actually one of the biggest challenges that we're facing.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Implementer
PeerSpot user
reviewer2242911 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Security team leader at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Dec 21, 2023
An antivirus solution that works even in offline mode
Pros and Cons
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a strong yet lightweight tool. It allows us to control machines even when disconnected from the network. In offline mode, we can generate passwords and access the system. The policies it offers are robust."
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business needs an easier mechanism for updates."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution as an antivirus product. 

How has it helped my organization?

The solution is an effective protection tool with easy management. The suite has numerous features that, if purchased separately, would cost us significantly.

What is most valuable?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a strong yet lightweight tool. It allows us to control machines even when disconnected from the network. In offline mode, we can generate passwords and access the system. The policies it offers are robust.

What needs improvement?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business needs an easier mechanism for updates. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the product for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 9000 endpoints. 

How are customer service and support?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business' support is good. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The tool's deployment was straightforward with the help of Kaspersky. It takes one week to complete. 

What was our ROI?

We have seen ROI with the product. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business' pricing is reasonable, and licensing costs are annual. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the tool a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Manager at Tradebulls Securities (P) Limited
Real User
Nov 8, 2023
A cost-effective solution that needs to improve support
Pros and Cons
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a cost-effective solution."
  • "The product offers support only through mail and not on the phone."

What is most valuable?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a cost-effective solution. 

What needs improvement?

The product offers support only through mail and not on the phone. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the product for two years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is stable. 

How was the initial setup?

The tool's deployment is easy. It took five years to deploy the product. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the product a seven out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Manager, Infrastructure & Support at UMH
Real User
Aug 15, 2023
Has a good interface but needs to improve support and pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool's interface is good."
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business should improve its reporting. There are also some issues in the cloud portal. The solution's pricing can be cheaper."

What is most valuable?

The tool's interface is good. 

What needs improvement?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business should improve its reporting. There are also some issues in the cloud portal. The solution's pricing can be cheaper. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the solution for four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have more than 11,000 customers for the product and it is scalable. 

How are customer service and support?

My experience with customer support is good. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The tool's installation is easy. You can install it in a week's time. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's pricing is acceptable. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Computer Engineer at Infinity
Real User
May 25, 2023
A scalable solution that helps to prevent malware attacks
Pros and Cons
  • "I am impressed with the tool's main dashboard, anti-malware application blocking, DDoS, etc."
  • "The product needs to incorporate training programs or webinars for users. The solution needs to improve its support as well. It also needs to detect ransomware."

How has it helped my organization?

Before using the product, our organization was infected with malware attacks. 

What is most valuable?

I am impressed with the tool's main dashboard, anti-malware application blocking, DDoS, etc. 

What needs improvement?

The product needs to incorporate training programs or webinars for users. The solution needs to improve its support as well. It also needs to detect ransomware. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the product's stability a seven out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the tool's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 240 users for the solution. 

How was the initial setup?

I would rate the product's setup an eight out of ten. The deployment can be completed between 10-30 minutes. We required only two staff for the deployment process. 

What about the implementation team?

The solution's deployment was done in-house. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. You need to pay extra costs for additional modules. The product's licensing costs are yearly. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. You need to get training before the installation. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1747860 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastrcuture Analyst at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jan 16, 2022
Good admin capabilities, helpful against zero-day attacks, and reliable
Pros and Cons
  • "The admin capabilities are great."
  • "The admin capabilities are great."
  • "The solution could use better reporting."
  • "The solution could use better reporting."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution as a traditional antivirus for signature-based activities such as malware or infections. It's for employing remediation and prevention detection.

What is most valuable?

The admin capabilities are great.

I have found the solution to be stable.

The product can scale as needed.

What needs improvement?

The solution could use better reporting. We'd like to have a bit more than just a dashboard and a few pie charts. 

We're looking at EDRs, and MDRs, and SLRs and stuff like that. If they had integrations with something like a Dark Trace or more native integrations, either through an open API or something, that would probably be ideal for us in terms of the direction we're taking. 

For how long have I used the solution?

It's an inherited system, so it's been here for more than four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good enough. I haven't had issues with bugs or glitches. I can't recall it crashing or freezing. it's pretty reliable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution has the capability to scale if you need it to. 

We have about 550 users on the product currently. It's used across most departments, except for a few. 

How was the initial setup?

It was an inherited solution. It was already here when I became employed. Therefore, I can't speak to the implementation process. 

What other advice do I have?

I'm just a customer and an end-user.

In terms of the versions we are using, on the administration side, it's Admin Security Center 13 and on the endpoint side, for the actual work stations and server, it's 11.6.

I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. Like all endpoint antiviruses, it does a fair job on zero-day attacks. Obviously, with the next-day attacks, it's going to do more. That's where its strengths are.

I would advise new users to stick with the traditional approach of having a business case and a use case and then doing a proof of concept.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
IT manager at CBCI
Real User
Jan 16, 2022
It provides high visibility into security risks and automatically addresses threats
Pros and Cons
  • "Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks. We have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns. We can see any viruses that are in the network and take action."
  • "Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks; we have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns, and we can see any viruses that are in the network and take action."
  • "I've had some problems with the web interface. For example, when I was running a trace, it's difficult to find this function, but I can see it when I go on the server. So, if I want to implement the EDR functions on the web interface, it's very difficult because the command button or the link doesn't appear."
  • "I've had some problems with the web interface. For example, when I was running a trace, it's difficult to find this function, but I can see it when I go on the server."

What is our primary use case?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is used to protect from and respond to anything tentatively identified as a virus and ransomware.

How has it helped my organization?

Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks. We have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns. We can see any viruses that are in the network and take action.

What needs improvement?

I've had some problems with the web interface. For example, when I was running a trace, it's difficult to find this function, but I can see it when I go on the server. So, if I want to implement the EDR functions on the web interface, it's very difficult because the command button or the link doesn't appear. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Endpoint Security for about two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kaspersky is generally stable, but I run into problems when I schedule one hour of EDR on my network. The different machines on my network slowed down, so I reduced the scheduled EDR to one or two hours per day. After that, my PC was very fast.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I believe Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable. We currently have 600 users. We could possibly increase our usage if the number of users increases.

How are customer service and support?

Kaspersky's support is good. We haven't had any problems. When I had difficulties installing Kaspersky, support texted sent us a fix.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up Kaspersky was difficult. It took about three weeks to deploy because I have 600 PCs. I had a hard time installing the old version of Kaspersky on a PC. And there was a delay in connecting Kaspersky to the new server. We have a team of 10 IT people responsible for managing the solution.

What about the implementation team?

We had help from a reseller. The reseller helped a lot because my PC environment was old, so it was challenging to implement.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost of a Kaspersky enterprise license comes out to about $18,000 annually.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security eight out of 10. My advice to new Kaspersky users is to have a good PC and a solid network infrastructure. Also, when you have any issues, it's essential to resolve them quickly. I recommend Endpoint Security because it has been good to me. It automatically responds to viruses or ransomware activities, so I don't have to do anything. My biggest lesson from using Kaspersky is realizing the importance of antivirus software on our network.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior System & Security Administrator at a retailer with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 10, 2022
Secure and reliable with an easy initial setup
Pros and Cons
  • "It offers very good security protection."
  • "The solution is very stable and offers very good security protection, with a straightforward installation process that is very simple to manage."
  • "The performance is not very good."
  • "The performance is not very good. It's acceptable with the security."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is primarily used for protection. It's useful for internet accessing and network accessing protection and for flash memory protection from sharing, accessing, and other attacks.

What is most valuable?

The solution is very stable. It offers very good security protection.

The installation process is straightforward.

What needs improvement?

The performance is not very good. It's acceptable with the security. That said, the issue is that, when I opened the browser without Kaspersky antivirus, it's open in a few seconds, however, when I installed the antivirus on the laptop or computer and we try to open it, just open the browser, it takes double the amount of time. Without the antivirus, it's opening in four seconds and with the antivirus it's opening in 20 seconds. It's making everything hang.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for about two years at this point. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the product is good, and it does offer good protection. However, the performance isn't as good, as it slows systems down.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have about 25 users on the solution currently. 

We likely will increase usage in the near future.

How are customer service and support?

I've never had to contact technical support. It's so easy I don't need to contact the help desk or technical team of Kaspersky.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Kaspersky, I was using ESET. We got a good offer from Kaspersky that had a lower price point and therefore we moved to them. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult. It's very straightforward and very simple. 

It's a server installation. It takes about one or two hours, and the implementation for every user takes minutes as it's around in the background.

For the administration of the solution, we only need one of our technical team members to manage it. For the installation, it takes two people. It might take two or three hours before it's deployed for all of the users.

What about the implementation team?

We can handle the installation ourselves, with our own in-house team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We pay a yearly licensing fee.

This product costs less than our past solution, ESET.

What other advice do I have?

We're using the latest version of the solution at this time. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.