Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

I used the solution for signature-based detection, machine learning, threat detection, behavior-based detection, and for the endpoint.

The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics. The solution's reporting capabilities are good. I can generate and schedule custom reports from it. It's helpful and gives us a high, medium, and low-risk-based approach.

Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

I haven’t faced any stability issues with this solution.

The solution’s technical support is okay.

I have worked with other tools, but I like Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because it gives full endpoint control, including detection, vulnerability management, and file integrity.

The solution fulfilled our needs for the endpoints, including enhanced security and detection for the endpoints.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The reliability of Kaspersky Security is evident in its effectiveness in various use cases, including endpoint protection and antivirus functionalities.

Kaspersky supports the security needs of remote workforces by providing solutions tailored for remote usage. These solutions are particularly beneficial for employees outside traditional office environments, as they rely on VPNs to ensure security.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has the potential to enhance our clients' security stance significantly. I believe its comprehensive set of features is highly beneficial and sufficient for our customers' needs.

Deploying global policies is smooth, with no issues encountered in managing security policies.

The most valuable features for us include data security, as well as web browsing and password management security measures.

It would be beneficial if the price could be reduced, and improved management of the license allocation for adding additional Endpoint users would be advantageous. This would enhance the management capabilities for partitioning additional licenses.

It would be beneficial to have more robust cloud management capabilities for Endpoint. This would allow us to easily monitor threats originating from client devices and potentially establish remote connections to address issues. Such enhanced cloud functionality would greatly assist in IT management tasks.

I have been working with it for approximately seven years.

I would rate its stability abilities eight out of ten.

I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. We have around sixty users withing our client base.

Technical support is rated as five out of ten because it lacks local support for immediate assistance. This may lead to longer wait times for responses. However, given the stability of our current Endpoint, this shouldn't pose a significant issue. Improvement in technical support would be beneficial, especially in regions where direct support is unavailable.

Neutral

Prior to adopting Kaspersky, we utilized Sophos antivirus. However, I favor Kaspersky due to its user-friendly interface and minimal resource requirements.

I find the initial setup process for Kaspersky to be quite satisfactory compared to other products. Unlike some other solutions, I didn't encounter any issues with installation or needing to guide the customer through the process.

It can typically be implemented within an hour.

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

In my company, we use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, just like how we use Sophos Central and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good.

The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product.

Once you look at the console from the on-premises version, you can see that the GUI mode is very old, meaning you feel like you are dealing with something vintage in nature. The tool's GUI mode is not updated to a new one. Kaspersky should change settings or parameters and make it easy enough for users to create policies since, presently, some difficulties are encountered when creating the policies. The tool needs to change some components in the console to make the product easy to access and configure the policies.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for two years.

There are no bugs in the product. It is a stable solution.

I know about a company that has around 600 users of the solution where I did the configuration.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises model.

Once my company gets the license, we access the URL, after which we use the URL for configuration, license activation, creating agents, and creating the necessary policies, after which we take care of the setup phase for handing over the product to the customer.

The tool is expensive.

To those who plan to use the solution, I would say that we need a dedicated server to deploy the tool in several places.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

We use the software to secure and defend the network from malicious attacks for endpoints.

It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes.

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for eight or nine years.

It is a stable product.

We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is challenging to scale while working with a large number of users.

The technical support team takes time to respond to the queries. However, their documentation on the website is helpful.

Neutral

We encounter issues while deploying the product if it is not installed properly and requires one executive to work on the process. However, it is easy to maintain.

We purchase the software’s yearly license. It includes support and maintenance updates. The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products.

We evaluated a few similar products. We decided to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as it is more stable, has different defense models, and helps in efficient network supervision.

The product uses a lot of resources for hardware. It is necessary to install and configure the product correctly. I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

We're using it on the endpoint on the user's computer and the servers. We have licenses for workstations and servers. And it's the endpoint security that is the antivirus and the IDS integrated. We also use it to manage some restrictions and web browsing for some users. We allow them to browse some websites and also we restrict some devices and ports.

The firewall is the most valuable feature for us. 

The solution is user-friendly.

It's stable and reliable.

The deployment could be better. Recently when I try to deploy it I received a large number of failures. It is very slow as well.

As an IT analyst, it's easy to use. However, some users don't want to use it as it is more complicated, and due to the firewall, they cannot connect to some websites or other networks. That said, it's still a very good product.

I've been using the solution for five years. 

The solution is stable. It's easy to use. It's reliable and there are no bugs or glitches.

The solution doesn't really scale per se. 

We have two IT specialists and are using it directly. The other users are only end users and there are about 600 of them.

I haven't used support much. I only opened one ticket with them. However, I found the solution myself. Nobody even gave me training and I was able to figure it out. 

We are leaving Kaspersky next year. We will work with Microsoft instead. We'll be using Defender. 

We had trouble deploying the solution as we ended up getting many failures, which was not helpful.

Most of the time, it's from the script I wrote myself, and I used to deploy it before in the previous version. We're using Security Center 13 in the version and it was working fine, and we're still using the same application. At the same time, also with version 13 it's very slow and has a large number of failures. Right now, I'm using another tool to deploy the software to the computer to get around issues.

I am able to manage the solution myself. I manage the server. 

The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee. 

We are a customer and end-user. 

I use it both on-premises and in the cloud. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. We've been mostly happy with the product overall. 

Initially, we used the solution for endpoint protection, but now we also use it for detection response.

I like the fact that the solution is automated to a large extent, and it works on its own with minimal intervention. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business detects malware and is easy to configure.

The solution's management console can be better and more granular than it is now. The solution could add a sandbox in which we could simulate files. The technical support team’s response time could be improved.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for 12 years.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

The solution's technical support used to be slow, and they forced you to get paid support. With free support, you typically get a response in a day or two for your queries.

Neutral

I have previously used McAfee and Norton. McAfee used to be quite heavy on the system, and quite a lot of malware used to fall through it back then.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup a nine out of ten.

For a 2,500-user environment, it took a week to deploy the solution. Our IT team worked on the implementation of the solution.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is an expensive solution.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

The solution is centrally managed. We deploy the network agent with Windows tools and then deploy the endpoint security through the network agent. The solution has effectively improved our endpoint security posture, and we've not had any ransomware issues. The solution has a negative impact on the performance of our endpoints.

We can do some investigation with the EDR component. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We install Kaspersky to protect our endpoints for clients and servers. In the past, Kaspersky had different solutions for the clients and servers. We use the solution for protection from viruses, malware, etc., on the client's side.

I'm not sure if we'll increase usage of Kaspersky or try another solution. We are having discussions now with Trend Micro because we have new business requirements, and we want to see all the different capabilities that are there.

When we started with Kaspersky, it was an antivirus system, but now they've added endpoint protection, so it has more capabilities. Trend Micro has the same product and engine for clients and servers. We are using another product from Trend Micro that will integrate these products, which is better than having different solutions. For now, we're still using Kaspersky, but in the future, I think we'll move to Trend Micro.

With Kaspersky in place, we haven't faced any problems with viruses, ransomware, or anything like that. 

If something critical happens, Kaspersky will alert the admin or SOC team about it. I think Kaspersky's reporting, monitoring, and notifications should be more detailed.  

In my case, different admins are responsible because we have various departments. There is one admin per department. We don't need to receive all the notifications. We can receive only the critical alerts, but the other admins need to get all of them. That's one area where Kaspersky needs improvement.

I've been using Kaspersky for five or six years.

The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us. However, the performance wasn't optimal out of the box. It needed some tuning on it to be sure that it is the best configuration. Kaspersky is reliable. I can't recall any time we had crashes or downtime.

Kaspersky is highly scalable. Right now, we have more than 500 users in various departments, including regular employees and managers.

Kaspersky support is fast and good.

Setting up Kaspersky isn't complex at all. It's straightforward. You install the server, and then you can install the agent remotely. It didn't take very long either. For post-installation maintenance, we have different sites, and each site has an engineer responsible for handling Kaspersky. The product doesn't necessarily require this many engineers. It's only because we have different locations. Right now, we have five or six engineers across the various sites.

We used a Kaspersky partner for implementation. They were very good.

I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable,
especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support. We've owned the license for a long time, and we are now bringing in the support, so we are not paying much for this.

Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license. That would save the customers from having to do lots of implementations. As far as I know, they do not have a bundled license. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security seven out of 10. I think Kaspersky is one of the best products for small and medium-sized businesses. It doesn't need that much experience for implementation and support. I would suggest that new users be patient when they're tuning in the first implementation. They might find that the system uses a lot of resources and the machines become slow. But after spending some time tuning, the product will work fine.

I use the solution in my company for endpoints and for anti-malware purposes. I use the solution for the endpoints in our infrastructure, so it allows me to block USBs or any other incoming connections from unknown sources.

The tool is easy to use for me, especially if it is the on-premises version. The product is easy to install. The best thing about the solution stems from the fact that it is available at a very low price with a lot of features that can be modified to meet the users' requirements. The policies of the product are easy to use.

The product is hard to use on a cloud server. From an improvement perspective, the use of the product on a cloud server should be made better. The GUI of the product is too basic, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for five to six years. I don't remember the version of the solution. My company has a partnership with Kaspersky.

The major problem I have with the product stems from the fact that it needs more RAM space. My company has to make more RAM space.

Around 2,000 people in my company use the product.

I am very happy with the solution's technical support team.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

Users must install MySQL first, after which they can install Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, after which they can use a package installer from another client that automatically connects the tool on the server, making it an easy process.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in an hour or two.

The product is available at a low price.

The integration of the tool with our company's existing IT infrastructure is good and helpful.

In my company, we have choices. If I want to use a cloud-based tool for endpoint security, we use Sophos. If I want an on-premises endpoint security product, I prefer Kaspersky.

If you want cheap endpoint security, especially on an on-premises server, I highly recommend Kaspersky since it is easy to use, install, and available at a low price.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.