Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers Reviews

We use it for microservices. It is for the main applications and growth of the business.

It has good integration. You have VMware for connecting many machines, and you can support microservices. You can also easily connect the networks. 

It is also very easy to use and implement, and it comes with good support.

It should have tools for integration with the cloud. We should be able to transmit data from our on-premises server to the servers in the cloud.

I have been using this solution for about eight years.

It has good stability. 

It is easy to scale. We have around 300 users.

They provide good support. We have a software to communicate with them and get any help that we need.

Before Lenovo, there was an IBM server. We started to use this server because it is easy to use for microservices, and there are many applications. 

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took about three months. We had to integrate microservices, and we also had applications.

We deployed it ourselves. In the company, we have more than three people for its deployment and maintenance.

It costs around $8,000. There is an additional cost for the support for a year.

Nutanix and HPE are also good options. Nutanix is a little expensive. HPE has only two servers, but we need three servers.

It is a very good product. It is very easy to implement, and you can scale it easily. It is useful for us, and we plan to keep using it. When the company grows, we would add more servers.

I would rate Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers an eight out of ten.

It's a large virtualization environment where our students and our researchers have all the machines running and it's realized with VMware.

We appreciate the stability of all the machines.

The easy mountings are convenient. 

We have some direct connections to IBM and Lenovo, as well as other companies. They offer us very good manufacturer support. Technical support has been very good and we've been satisfied with the level of service we get.

The solution is very simple to install.

There are so many features, it's difficult to even use them all. Therefore, I don't believe there are any features that are lacking.

From our side, our budgets are really not there. The availability of cash is a little bit limited. We buy as much as we can, If it was less expensive, we could buy more.  

I deal with this solution about once a year.

The solution is stable. It's very reliable. There aren't glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution can scale quite easily. If you need to expand it, you can do so rather easily.

We have about 1,000 people on the servers that we have. They are all students and researchers.

We'll continue to use this product going forward.

We've had a good experience with technical support. We have some direct channels there. With Lenovo, we also have a mainframe on our site for demonstration purposes. We are lucky to have a direct connection to the engineers.

The initial setup is not complex. It's very straightforward.

Deployment times vary. If students are doing it, it might take a little bit longer, however, if we handle it ourselves, we can do it relatively quickly.

It's difficult to count how many people we have on deployment and maintenance duties as they're all part-time. We have about four to five full-time equivalents.

I am part of the consulting team. The work is done by some assistants or to teach a student as I'm a lecturer at the University.

The cost is a bit pricey. We'd buy more from them if we could, however, we are on a limited budget.

We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with Lenovo.

Normally, we are not using the latest version of the solution due to the fact that they are too expensive. We are a university and we have to look for how much money we use. Therefore, often we end up buying some refurbished machines or some equipment from IBM, from Lenovo, etc., which we get at reasonable prices.

Everything is on-premises and we have our own private cloud with these machines.

I'd recommend the solution to other organizations. 

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate it at a nine.

We started adding servers to our central offices, and we considered HP devices, but we found Lenovo was a better choice for us. 

It performs really well, and the price is cheaper than other solutions. They are extremely reliable. 

The management troubles us a bit. We also had some issues getting VMware to run on the Lenovo servers. We were told to go to HP but we stuck with Lenovo. 

I would like to see the management port improved. We do use XClarity, which is from Lenovo, but it still needs an upgrade. It is difficult to work with and it would be beneficial for Lenovo to improve this.

The stability is great.

This is a scalable product. When considering discs to servers, it is very reliable.

We have another party that handles our tech support issues.

About eight years ago, IBM was our preferred supplier. They were also the cheapest. We switched because IBM sold their hardware service to Lenovo.

At one point, we also considered Intel servers, but we still stayed with Lenovo.

It was complex to get this started because the Lenovo and VMware are not very compatible. We had to get some updates in order for it to be implemented.

It is the cheapest solution we have seen on the market.

When considering a vendor, I always consider reliability and cost. 

Implementation of site backup. 

Improvements came in as:

• Server scalability
• Better asset-park management
• Better security to keep services active
• Convergence between manageable equipment
• Many other benefits resulted in better service delivery and continuity.

• Implementation of server clusters using VMware. 
• Ensures high availability, better hardware management, and support for active features.

To date, we have not seen any need for improvements.

Throughout the use of the product, special needs will arise which may require a global need.

As the costs got high, we had to use the virtualization feature to consolidate the server farm.

The management/load performance is the most valuable feature.

The hardware can be evaluated by its efficient management, resource visibility and easy to use features.

Secondly, performance is the main goal of the machines. I have very good experience with the IBM Server and Storage.

The peak performance has made the organization's key application up and running; it has never failed.

IBM hardware takes time for building/assembling. Also, the firmware update process takes too much time as compared to the other vendors like Dell.

I have used this solution for nine years.

During firmware updates/NIC teaming , some errors were experienced.

There were no scalability issues.

I would rate the technical support a 9/10.

Previously, we were using IBM; it provides the most efficient and reliable computing hardware.

Setup is a little complex, i.e., in terms of the firmware and system updates.

We looked at Dell Chassis M1000e and HPE c7000.

The installation and configuration are a bit difficult but the product's performance is unbeatable.

I really appreciate the robust performance.

It has really helped us with its steady, smooth performance, and stability.

I would like to see an automatic call home feature for IMM2.

I have used it for just over one year.

I have never encountered any stability issues.

I have never encountered any scalability issues.

Technical support was very good. IBM support is very helpful.

I did not use a previous solution.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We evaluated Dell and Hitachi blade servers.

We use Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers as storage servers.

The performance of the solution could be better.

I have been using Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers for approximately three months.

I rate the stability of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers a nine out of ten.

I rate the scalability of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers a nine out of ten.

We have two clients using this solution.

I did not use the support.

The initial setup of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers is straightforward. The process of implementation took me approximately two to three days. We only had to install the hardware for the installation.

I rate the initial setup of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers a nine out of ten.

The price of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers is highly competitive. Many customers prefer this solution because of the price. However, the price could be reduced.

There is a license needed to use the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers a nine out of ten.