Microsoft Entra ID Protection Reviews

Our company uses the solution to provide identity protection services to customers. We currently have fifteen developers on our team. 

The solution provides good information security that includes sensitive labeling. 

The sign-in and audit logs work well. 

The reverse proxy feature provides additional security that is not available in other solutions such as SailPoint and Dell. 

Identity labeling and sensitivity needs improvement to be comparable to Dell. 

Password management needs to include a keyword mechanism that blocks or allows generic passwords. 

The auditor tool needs to include SIEM events in addition to sign-in and audit logs. Currently, we have to rely on third-party solutions for our log needs. 

The solution's models need to be centralized instead of having different names and separate platforms. We have to spend a lot of time integrating all the models with the IAM. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

The solution is stable and reliable.

The solution is scalable to a customer's needs. 

Technical support is very good.

I rate support an eight out of ten. 

Positive

The initial setup is simple. Getting ready for implementation takes time because it requires internal meetings and planning. 

I rate setup an eight out of ten. 

We implemented the solution in-house with a team of twenty technicians. 

Ongoing maintenance is not an issue because we pre-tested all components before implementation. 

The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user. 

I rate pricing an eight out of ten. 

We are currently researching applications that will replace our hybrid model and include SIEM management. 

We have looked at the capabilities of Dell and SailPoint. 

The solution needs to be better marketed to the SMA segment because they are not as aware of information security. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

I use the solution to manage users, groups, access, and license. 

The tool is simple and you can find a lot of tutorials, and videos on YouTube that can help you. 

The solution's sync should be faster since it can take about 30 minutes to two hours to complete a simple sync. The tool needs to sync instantly. It also needs to improve scalability, support, and stability. 

I have been using the product for four years. 

I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. We encountered bugs while integrating with other Microsoft or MDM solutions. 

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 200 users.

Support takes longer than expected to revert back. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

The solution helps us with authentication. 

I am impressed with the tool's compliance and authentication. 

The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten.