MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Reviews

We are using MongoDB for storing user information and our customer data. If an application requires to save information, that data is stored in MongoDB.

MongoDB has helped my organization by being able to handle large amounts of data. Nowadays, if users are using our application all the data we store in our database. If you're trying to receive the information from the database, it's important we are able to retrieve the result as quickly as possible.

The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the NoSQL database. In a SQL database, we need to join data together with a unique ID amongst other things, but in MongoDB, it's not required. We can directly receive all the information. The performance is very good. Additionally, they have frequent updates.

I have been using MongoDB for approximately two years.

The stability of MongoDB is good.

MongoDB is scalable.

We have approximately seven backend developers using this solution.

The MongoDB community support is very good. I was facing some problems using some queries, so I posted my issue on that community channel, and within one day, I received a solution. The support was very quick.

I rate the support from MongoDB a four out of five.

I previously used MySQL and PostgreSQL, but I had permission and licensing issues with MySQL. I prefer MongoDB over others.

The initial setup of MongoDB is straightforward. We only had to use a few commands to install it.

There are different licenses available to be purchased, such as individual, premium, or enterprise.

I did evaluate other options before choosing MongoDB.

Only one person is required for the maintenance of the solution.

I recommend MongoDB to others.

I rate MongoDB a nine out of ten.

We are using MongoDB as the database on our private cloud, which is AWS in Frankfurt. We monitor different banks adopting cloud in our infrastructure with confirmation and approval by the local regulator.

It's mostly all related to our digital part of the bank. We are using MongoDB for the process of onboarding new products. When we are actually calculating proposals for mortgages or complex financial products, we must consider that calculation across many sources. Some are internal. Some are external. We are using MongoDB to support the calculation, or proposal calculation, on our web digital processes.

It has given us a chance to explain to people that once the bank made the decision to migrate some processes, applications, and data into the cloud, it was a benefit. It's not only about the change of process and application components. It's also about changing the data ownership and data operation. It went hand to hand, actually, to start training them that there is something beyond Oracle and SQL databases. With Mongo, our team was happy to get a chance to learn something new.

However, once some people learned the solution, we did lose them to someone else. It shows how popular it is not only in our organization but in other places as well. 

We are actually taking MongoDB as serious database tech. It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle. When we have some processes which really don't need Oracle, we use MongoDB as the first option to see if it wouldn't be cheaper to leverage.

Oracle is stronger in some specific features. For example, the remote cluster when you need to synchronize the enormous amount of data between two data centers and so on. It's that Oracle RDC and Oracle GoldenGate which are actually about the data replication which can be supported by the nature of the database scheme.

We are actually validating each process and also new processes in what we call the operational tier, and if you are having the business-critical processes which need business-critical operative data, we actually prefer Oracle over MongoDB.

MongoDB is the second option for non-critical processes at the moment. We do not yet trust it with critical items.

We'd like information about client onboarding experience and success stories. It would help to have something to show to internal stakeholders. We need some use cases from the outside to begin to open discussions on how we can use this tech in more ways in the future. 

It started during the HR transformation. I would say we started using it four years ago.

For the scenarios we have chosen, it's ranked as stable. We also made what we call disaster recovery scenarios to be able to replicate MongoDB content after failures. So far, it's been very good. It's fast.

We can scale. It went hand in hand with our AWS journey and the cloud infrastructure. I remember one scenario which involved a quite popular product in the Czech Republic. It was for savings accounts. We were actually able to predict the number of interactions being required during the phase of the product opening. We prepared the infrastructure from MongoDB and after that period of time, it was shrunken back to the original size. It scaled up and down exactly as we needed it to.

We have seven internal people including analysts and data engineers working on the solution. They are creating tables and preparing the data loads.

We use it quite a bit now. We take it as the second option for initial test requirements in regards to the data infrastructure. The Oracle Database is not the first choice anymore, except for the Tier 1 pieces of processes.

I am not involved in the troubleshooting. I don't directly deal with technical support.

We also use Oracle. Previously, a long time ago, I also used Teradata.

In Asian companies, Oracle is very expensive to use and adopt.

We started using Mongo as it was stable and easy to adopt.

The first time we deployed the solution was actually a limited implementation to support the proof of concept. When we had some objectives when it came to validating how fast we were able to prepare Mongo at AWS, it was quite simple. 

The second part was actually to handle the initial training of people for operation and administration. Now we actually have some results which prove that the MongoDB way is a positive way and this is what we ended up using for other scenarios.

I would say that if you would were looking for 100% of the data in the cloud, MongoDB would currently be at 50%.

The initial proof of concept was scheduled for three months.

We did the cloud adoption in-house. We did have help with a few complex elements. It was supervised and everything was finished by the internal code team to improve their skills and learn what was needed to have BAU, business as usual.

The ROI is fair. I'd rate it 2.5 out of five in terms of getting a return on investment. It's something, on our side, that we still have to fully adopt, however. 

I was trying to compare pricing in terms of how much it would cost to do a TCO. We are counting TCO five years ahead - the total sum of money. It was 2.5 times cheaper than Oracle. I would say it's stable and the pricing is reasonable.

This is the first time we've adopted the cloud and therefore it's hard to truly gauge how much it will be a year out. It could change. It's difficult to accurately predict.

We faced some extra costs for what we call the L2 and L3 additional support.

We are customers and end-users.

We are likely on the latest version right now. 

You can adopt this tech very easily on your private cloud. AWS is actually broadly supporting and it's not only us but also a lot of other industries. MongoDB is not unknown. There are a lot of people that have experience with it, however, it's very important if you have a company that is evaluating something, to have the ability to execute. 

If you have some local vendors, if you have international vendors, if you have some integrators that are able to use it and to help you use it, MongoDB is a good choice.

I'd rate the solution five out of ten.

We used MongoDB on AWS for a specific project.

We put MongoDB on AWS for a specific project. It's easy to use.

If something is wrong on the cluster, then you need to contact the support team. The stability could be better.

I used MongoDB for about a year.

It's okay. It's acceptable. The stability could be better.

If something is wrong on the cluster, you need to contact the support team. At first, when we were trying to build a cluster.

Neutral

We rated MongoDB a seven out of ten.

We use this solution for database verification purposes. Typically, we integrate other analytics tools with the solution, like databases and other tools.

The Dynamic Application is a valuable feature.

The analytics needs improvement.

I have been using MongoDB for a couple of years. 

Hundreds of users use the solution at present. 

The initial setup is straightforward.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We use MongoDB mainly for data visualization and filtering purposes.

MongoDB's most valuable feature is data visualization.

They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages. There could be a feature where commands made in MongoDB could be easily copied and shared in their original format. This functionality would enable seamless transition and compatibility between platforms like Linux and mobile devices, reducing the need for complex filters or Citrix-based solutions.

We have been using MongoDB for five months.

I rate the platform's stability a nine out of ten.

My department has around 50 MongoDB users.

It is a cloud-based version and is simple to deploy.

We evaluated OracleDB and MongoDB. We decided to work with MongoDB as its interface is easier to understand and more universal. It offers ease of integration and simpler configurations compared to OracleDB. It also provides all the essential functionality.

I rate MongoDB a nine out of ten.

Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB. Atlas is an awesome feature of MongoDB that makes life easy.

People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries. This feature is working, but we can still achieve some integration and make it more flexible. It is not as easy as writing direct queries on Atlas. This feature will definitely increase a lot of users. RDBMS users think this is a different query language, MQL, which is uncomfortable for them.

I have been using MongoDB version 6.0 for more than 12 years as a customer.

MongoDB is a very stable solution. The solution is a leader, according to the Gartner report.

In our company, around 2000 to 3000 people are using the solution.

MongoDB’s technical support is awesome.

Positive

We previously used the RDBMS solution, MySQL.

MongoDB has five to ten times better performance than MySQL. MongoDB has a lot of advantages. With MongoDB, you can store any kind of data, including structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data. MongoDB has a lot of benefits over RDBMS.

It is very easy to deploy MongoDB. If it is deployed on-premises, it takes an hour. It does not need any additional prerequisites or configuration details.

We have seen a lot of ROI with MongoDB because it gives five to ten times better performance.

MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others.

The solution's pricing depends on the deal, which includes how long you will use it and the number of deployments. They do not have a fixed cost. However, the maintenance and support cost is included.

I am satisfied with the product.

Our organization has a DBA team of 50 people. However, the work for the DBAs is minimal because MongoDB intends to have zero DBA. They want to develop a product where the need for DBAs is minimized.

Users should approach MongoDB with an open mind, without thinking that it's a different technology altogether and has a different language. Users don't need to develop the application based on a schema. They can develop the application, and the schema will follow.

Overall, I rate MongoDB an eight out of ten.

MongoDB is easy to use. 

It isn't easy to recognize entities with MongoDB. 

The tool's installation is easy for anyone with experience in databases. 

MongoDB's pricing is reasonable. 

I rate the solution a six out of ten. 

I think that MongoDB's search engine should be improved.

My impression is that this is a stable product.

My impression is that this is a scalable product.

When it comes to technical support, I am the same as our reseller. I use community help and google.

My impression is that the initial setup is straightforward.

MongoDB is a fast and safe solution.

I would rate this solution as a whole a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I primarily use MongoDB for personal projects or minor stuff that I have developed for people who are starting. I'm currently doing testing on MongoDB for new features we're developing at my company.

It's super easy to develop a couple of solutions for clients with MongoDB, like a quick web page with no clear data structure that they need to spin up quickly to validate some sort of MDTP.

The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes.

I have used MongoDB for three or four years. 

MongoDB is solidly stable. 

I rate MongoDB nine out of 10 for scalability.

I rate MongoDB support nine out of 10. It's pretty good.

Positive

Setting up MongoDB is super easy.

I rate MongoDB nine out of 10. I recommend reading up on NoSQL in general to learn the best practices. 

If we don't have relational data we use MongoDB. It is in JSON format, and we can use JSON. Therefore, without relational data, without type coupling with columns, we can use MongoDB. We use it for queries.

The most important aspect is the clustering part. If you have read/write databases, then MongoDB will be easy to use. You can split those databases. We can save the data into JSON without relational data. 

It is very fast - faster than an SQL or MySQL Server.

Therefore, if you have unstructured data, you should go with MongoDB.

I work with Kafka. Kafka is sending a lot of data - millions of records in seconds. It is not easy to just pass it into the SQL Server. Instead, we are sending those drivers to the MongoDB Server, the MongoDB database. it is very fast

You can manage very fast queries with MongoDB in JSON format. 

The clustering is great. You can have multiple clusters in MongoDB.

It is scalable. Technical support is helpful. 

We'd like to have access to foreign keys.

Sometimes we need to be able to delete unintended data from the end user, and we'd like to have that capability.

The solution is a bit expensive.

There can be stability issues. 

I've been using the solution for three years. 

Sometimes you have multiple requests at the same time and there are thousands of millions of data points. There may be performance issues in that case. Sometimes it is stable and sometimes it is not. 

The solution can handle multiple clusters, so the scaling is fine. Sometimes scaling is not required if you have multiple read databases.

I also use AKS and you can use AKS functionality to scale MongoDB services. 

Technical support is okay.

Neutral

We have it deployed on the cloud with a container. 

It is not a complex setup. It is easy to use. You just compose a file and deploy it from there. 

We have one DevOps team that can handle deployment tasks there are three to five people on it.

We have not witnessed an ROI.

The pricing is okay. It's a bit expensive. I'd rate it eight out of ten in terms of affordability. 

We're using something around version three. 

Overall, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.