Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user222801 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Program Manager at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Apr 14, 2015
Straightforward set-up but it does require some technical expertise to do it.
Pros and Cons
  • "Critical network infrastructure has improved."

    What is most valuable?

    • Free
    • Open source
    • Robust
    • Strong community support
    • Strong author support

    How has it helped my organization?

    Critical network infrastructure has improved.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used it for two years.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I've also used Untangle and Sophos firewalls

    Buyer's Guide
    Netgate pfSense
    March 2026
    Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
    884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    How was the initial setup?

    Straightforward, but it requires some technical expertise and tweaking.

    What about the implementation team?

    We implemented it entirely in-house.

    What other advice do I have?

    Make sure the implementer has programming experience.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user149982 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user149982Project Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Vendor

    Indeed this is a very powerful opensource solution but as you say it requires some technical expertise and tweaking (but actually which firewall technology does not require some now?). Fortunately the community and project documentation are rich and very helpful. Extra packages availability is also rich, it goes from the simple CLI tool like bmon to fully graphically managed RADIUS, SQUID, SNORT servers for instance (see : doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Category:Packages). It also support natively High Availability Sync thanks to CARP and pfsync protocols (see: doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Configuring_pfSense_Hardware_Redundancy_%28CARP%29). Few days ago I set up VPN SSL configuration with OpenVpn in TAP mode, all done through the GUI (no need to edit any files through CLI) what quite impressed me (usually bridge creation is done through CLI).
    To conclude I really invite people looking for a free firewall solution to give a try with pfsense :-)
    Just keep in mind such a solution is devoted to projects requiring "not so much speed", I mean 40G or even 100G firewalling and either not UTM inspection.

    PeerSpot user
    Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
    Vendor
    Mar 31, 2015
    The proxy filtering is valuable except for blocking HTTPS which it can't do.
    Pros and Cons
    • "I was using another product, but it didn't have a bandwidth controller and monitoring tool like this product does, so I switched because I can find everything in one window."
    • "Proxy filters are not supported for the blocking of HTTPS sites."

    What is most valuable?

    • MAC Filtered DHCP and DNS
    • Captive Portal
    • VPN
    • Proxy Server
    • Proxy Filter

    How has it helped my organization?

    It has provided us with secure internet browsing and a strong monitoring ability.

    What needs improvement?

    Proxy filters are not supported for the blocking of HTTPS sites.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used it for two to three years.

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    No issues encountered yet.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No issues encountered yet.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No issues encountered yet.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Customer Service:

    I have not gotten any support from the customer service center because I can get all the solutions on their web blogs.

    Technical Support:

    I think it is perfect.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I was using another product, but it didn't have a bandwidth controller and monitoring tool like this product does. I switched because I can find everything in one window.

    How was the initial setup?

    Its installation setup & procedure is so simple that a layman could install it.

    What about the implementation team?

    I installed it by myself and used Google for assistance.

    What was our ROI?

    It's positive.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I just downloaded the program from the website free of chard. The best thing is, this product can be installed on any machine.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    No other options were evaluated.

    What other advice do I have?

    It is recommended, as it is a stable product.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user221874 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user221874Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
    Vendor

    Can any one have experienced to deploy Pfsense on Hyper-V ... I am planning to deploy this scenario.

    See all 2 comments
    Buyer's Guide
    Netgate pfSense
    March 2026
    Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
    884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    PeerSpot user
    Network Admin at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
    Consultant
    Jan 20, 2014
    The product is missing a graphic report implementation tool but performance, scalability and customization are valuable
    Pros and Cons
    • "After switching from Cisco, Juniper, Astaro and Microsoft network response improved and more control of packet (for me, pfpacket technology is better than packet filter.)"
    • "The initial approach is very complex because of the multiple functions, but after a short learning curve it is able to handle the standard functions."

    What is most valuable?

    Performance, cost effective, scalable, customizable

    How has it helped my organization?

    After switching from Cisco, Juniper, Astaro and Microsoft network response improved and more control of packet (for me, pfpacket technology is better than packet filter.)

    What needs improvement?

    Graphic report implementation tool (now possible with extra software)

    For how long have I used the solution?

    5+ years.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No, perfect scalability from 20 to 500 users

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Cisco, Microsoft and when TMG progressively died it was necessary to switch to unix technology, many corporations require low budget and high performance.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial approach is very complex because of the multiple functions, but after a short learning curve it is able to handle the standard functions.

    What about the implementation team?

    In my case, I buy network appliance from Lanner Inc. ltd (watchguard supplier) and deploy the image depending on the desired size and functionality required by the customer.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Identify the most suitable hardware for the required size.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Yes, Astaro and PaloAlto plus Juniper, but the renewal planes (AV, UTM, etc.) are very expensive.
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer868524 - PeerSpot reviewer
    IT consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
    Consultant
    Nov 15, 2021
    Reliable, scalable, simple installation
    Pros and Cons
    • "I have found pfSense to be stable."
    • "The solution could improve by having centralized management and API support online."

    What is most valuable?

    pfSense is very good because it allows us to do what we want.

    What needs improvement?

    The solution could improve by having centralized management and API support online.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using pfSense for a long time.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I have found pfSense to be stable.

    How are customer service and support?

    We are providing support for our customers here in Sweden.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup of pfSense is simple.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The price of pfSense is reasonable. However, there is a free version available.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to those wanting to implement pfSense is to start out with the free version before going with the appliance.

    I rate pfSense a ten out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: March 2026
    Product Categories
    Firewalls
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.