Postman Enterprise Reviews

We have been using Postman primarily for API automation.

API automation is crucial because every change in an API could have a significant impact. Postman has greatly reduced the effort required in testing APIs, thus enhancing our efficiency.

Postman is easy to use and enables us to test all possible API testing scenarios. It is economical compared to other testing tools, which is a valuable feature for us.

The main improvement needed is better integration with test management and other tools to allow a common dashboard for all testing metrics and details.

We have been using Postman for four to five years.

Postman is stable enough for our needs, although we have not tested it extensively with a large number of test cases.

We did not test Postman with thousands of test cases, so we cannot comment on its scalability for larger repositories.

We have not contacted Postman's technical support as we have managed all our needs internally.

Positive

Prior to using Postman, we used SoapUI. SoapUI was very basic and lacked many features that were then added in the paid version, SoapUI Pro, which was expensive. Postman provides better features than SoapUI.

Installation of Postman is straightforward and can be completed in a few hours by one person.

We did not require any external team for the implementation and managed it internally.

The return on investment is significant due to Postman's efficiency in automating API testing, which involves many input and output parameters.

Postman is economical and is considered to be rather cheap compared to other software solutions.

I have evaluated other tools such as Katalon, Tricentis Tosca, and Universal Function Test (UFT) from OpenText.

I would recommend enhancing Postman's integration capabilities with test management tools to better consolidate testing metrics.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use Postman from time to time to test real-time API connections.

When I receive documentation regarding API services, I use Postman to verify that the explanation in the documentation I received is working as described. In general, the tool is good for testing purposes.

The most valuable features of the solution are drafting requests, pushing the standard, and receiving responses. The tool's basic operational stuff is valuable.

The automation testing capability is something that I haven't used. In the past, I have used SoapUI to automate tasks, but I haven't tried it in Postman. I was not even aware that it was possible to automate tasks in Postman.

Some features related to the automation of tasks need to be added to the solution. The tool may already have some automated testing features, but I haven't discovered Postman's full operational status. When I need the tool's automated testing features, I will certainly have a look at the documentation.

I have been using Postman for four years. I am a user of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The stability of the product has been better since last month.

I have experience with SoapUI. The environment where I work for the moment is more Postman-oriented. In the past, some government departments in Belgium were using SoapUI. Postman is similar to SoapUI. The features in SoapUI, for instance, the automated testing features, are things that I don't need at the moment. Postman performs how I like it.

The product is easy to implement. You need some knowledge to implement the product. As I was more or less familiar with SoapUI, I could very easily pick up the way Postman works.

I use the tool's free version.

The product is not used for collaboration but for testing purposes in my company. In short, I use the product, and it is not used for exchanging or exporting data. I use the product at a very personal level, considering its API-related capabilities.

The tool performs well enough to meet my expectations.

I rate the tool an eight to nine out of ten.

I use Postman as a testing tool. I used Postman for one of the education-based applications named Compass. I can use Postman effectively.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and user-friendly. I can use Postman with simple Java codes, along with some secret codes. With Postman, I can create some complex test suites. With Postman, I can get some statistical reports, making its use so much fun for me.

From an improvement perspective, Postman can help users create a stronger feedback loop along with quicker and more responsive support resources.

I live in Turkey, so for me, the value of dollar currency is high. Postman can change its pricing policy and decrease the prices for Turkey.

I have been using Postman for half a year.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I worked with Postman all by myself in my IT group, but there is another group in my company with three or four members who use Postman presently.

I may use Postman even more for another project if needed in the future.

I rate the technical support a six out of ten.

Neutral

I use Selenium as a web development tool and testing tool. I also use Azure Database for MySQL.

I rate the product's initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is a very easy setup.

The product's installation phase is very easy.

The solution is not deployed on a cloud model.

The solution can be deployed in six or seven weeks.

The product's deployment process revolves around controlling back-end activities while also keeping control over the part of writing output codes, after which I could classify some tests on it. The deployment process of the product was easy.

I was alone in the project for deployment, as it was not so complicated for one person.

I could take care of the deployment of the product by myself without any other person or support.

I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey.

I researched other applications in the market and found that Postman is better than the others.

I can recommend Postman to others.

Considering the shortcomings that stem from Postman's pricing model and issues with support, I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Our developers use the product for unit testing and integration testing. Our QA team uses it for functional testing where we measure the performance of the scripts written in Javascript. We also rely on JMeter so that we don’t need to spend double the time on rewriting those tests again.

For example, contract testing will have scenarios that will contain around 20 API calls. After the login, you can create the data, edit or delete it, verify the changes, and log out. This will be one test case. There will be around 20-30 test cases. The script file will contain around 30 test cases written in a row.

Postman helps to write pre-request scripts and make a collection out of each request. You don’t have to spend time writing or copying the requests. The solution lets you integrate multiple environments and their features. Either the tool’s pro or premium version lets you do the merge and pull request for the Git directly.

Azure was really painful. Azure detected and exported collection files that were different every time. If your request had a unique ID, then it was really painful. The integration with Postman was really helpful. You will be able to see normal one-line changes. When we integrated Swagger definitions in Postman, the developers were able to see changes and differences when they update API descriptions.

I would like to see improvements in the maintenance of the scripts and their collections. It is really painful that the user cannot drag and drop. It was also painful to create the standard suite of operations for the product. I am not sure if this is improved in the tool’s latest versions. The maintenance of the complex scenarios prompted us to use the solution only for unit testing. In the future, we may switch to the k6 framework.

I have heard that solution is trying to implement the extension for VS Code. I am not sure about this since I haven’t used the latest version. However, I tried the latest version for an interview. The new UI confused me.

I have been using the solution for a year.

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I'm using Postman for manual testing of REST APIs. There are some built-in collections done by some of my teammates, so I use those.

The solution is deployed on a public cloud.

I have used some parameterization from a global variable, so that was working fine for me. It's easy to see different versions of responses. There's also a possibility for automation.

We cannot do database connections from Postman directly, and we don't have a way to do that. If they could implement auto-validations and assertions from SoapUI, that would be a very good feature.

We don't have a provision to go and connect to the database from Postman. That's one drawback. If you want to automate in Postman, there is a major drawback. Being a tester, you always want to cross-verify your data with the database. If the database is not connected, then part of your testing becomes manual.

I have used this solution for about seven years.

It's stable. Sometimes it has gone off, and I have had to rebuild the collections again. I've had to switch the logins sometimes. It has crashed twice, and I lost my suites and had to build it again.

Initial setup is easy. Sometimes we get the proxy errors, but when we go to the settings and disable the proxy things, it's pretty simple. Comparatively, SoapUI is easier for me.

Maybe some people who don't have a licensed version of Postman or ReadyAPI might feel that it's easier to automate with Postman, but I'm not sure about that because I haven't done it.

I would rate this solution as four out of ten.

If you don't have SoapUI or if you don't know about SoapUI, then of course you can use it. If you want to explore Postman, it's a free tool.

Postman is a scripting tool.

I started using the solution when we did an SDN-based network implementation from Cisco. I got introduced to a particular scripting tool where I could actually put down everything in an Excel sheet. And if I want to configure, for example, ten ports, then I can actually do the configuration of everything in an Excel sheet. I can pass my credentials in Postman, and I can import the SQL script, and based on whether it's an infrastructure script or a configuration script, I can actually save it in Postman.

I'm using Postman to only push the scripts into the ACI, and that is a very limited use of Postman that we do right now.

I'm sure it might have other usages. That said, we have not explored other features beyond that at this point in time.

The initial setup is easy.

The solution is stable.

It is very user-friendly and has a nice UI.

My limited use of Postman has been to get the output of scripting in Postman or get the output from APIs and then open it in Postman or post the script. We don't use it much beyond that and therefore haven't really explored the features. It's hard to say what is lacking.

Postman does not have a check-in balance. Essentially what I mean by that is if there is something that is already configured on a particular device, it just overrides it without checking whether you really want to override it or not. Even if it is by mistake, if there is a dialogue box that is available before it overrides, it's just a much nicer feature to be notified if you're doing something by mistake.

I've been using the solution for a while. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We haven't faced any issues.

I know that our team, which is three people, uses the solution. I'm not sure who else does in the company. We're all engineers. 

We have received all of the support we required. Postman has a very good team.

We use quite a few products from an infrastructure point of view. We use SolarWinds, both for server and infrastructure capacity, and we use a change management and a problem management tool. From a bandwidth monitoring perspective, we use a network analyzer; we use Splunk heavily. We do a lot of scripting tools using Postman and Python.

I'm more into Python since Python gives us many more API interjections and compatibility with a lot of other APIs. We started using Postman, and then we immediately moved to Python-based scripting.

The functionality that Python gives you concerning the available APIs and then the ability to put that in the Excel sheet is much better than Postman.

The solution is very easy to set up. There were no issues. 

I don't deal with the licensing aspect of the product. 

We looked into other solutions. However, Cisco actually recommended Postman, so we went with this product. 

I'm an end-user.

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. 

New users need to watch a few videos and understand the solution pretty well. If you are using Postman for the first time, never use the administrative credentials. It is very easy for you if you're using the administrative credentials to pass through the Postman's scripts. It is possible that you might override the configuration unknowingly. If that happens, that can actually bring down a good amount of your configuration or an earlier configuration. It's best to actually get the solution into a development environment before you actually do anything on production.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. It's a good, very user-friendly scripting tool. Anybody can learn it and start using it. However, new users do need a little bit of knowledge and must be willing to learn as they go.

There is a regular set of use cases, such as basic logins and long-form fills and submissions. There is a regular data set that we pick from the APIs, mostly with the GET, POST, and PUT calls. These are the three API methods we use regularly.

We are using the local version of Postman that we download for manual testing of the API. We do the automation directly in REST Assured with Java.

It makes manual testing very flexible, It's very user-friendly. When we do it through the Swagger file, we just go directly through a URL and hit the request/response, and validate that. Postman is very easy to use even for a person who doesn't have much knowledge or technical skills. It's very easy to use Postman and validate whatever we want to do. It's very comfortable and doesn't really require a user manual. It's a very user-friendly tool, and in a corporate environment, anyone can use the tool very easily. That's a benefit of Postman.

In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results.

When you try to code something and put it in the code, it's not useful. We have our developers or testers who know Java, but Postman is not flexible to use. The option to code in Java is not there in Postman. In ReadyAPI, we do it through Groovy scripts. If there was a provision in Postman to write down a few steps in Java code and run them together, that would be an improvement in Postman.

In Postman, for now, we are just doing API validations and running API scripts. If there is any way to have a record and playback feature through UI, as we do in Selenium and IDEs such as Eclipse, it would be great.

It has been almost two years.

It's very stable. I haven't faced any Postman crashes. Very often, you have latency issues. When there are any additional pop-ups or more tasks when it's open, there are a few latency issues. Other than that, it's a good tool.

Performance-wise, it's pretty good. On average, it does the job right. It's good enough for our requirements.

It's scalable. They have put a lot of new features into Postman. They have developed it in terms of UX/UI designing as well as features like runner, input level, and raw text level. So, it's scalable, but the downside is that they don't have any UI level of testing, and it cannot be integrated with any other supporting tool. It's not scalable in that way. 

I don't know the exact count, but we probably have 100 to 150 people using it. We use it very frequently. We use it on a daily basis.

So far, I haven't faced any challenges with it. I haven't been in touch with their support.

I also work with ReadyAPI. ReadyAPI is a more advanced tool than Postman because a lot of heavy data can be driven and a lot of test cases can be automated and triggered on a daily basis. That's how I worked with ReadyAPI. Postman is more of a manual effort tool, whereas ReadyAPI is more of an automation tool. It did have the option of scripting in Java or JavaScript, but I just worked with Google Script with ReadyAPI. So, I haven't worked on any other programming language with ReadyAPI, and I'm not very sure whether it supports any other languages such as Python or JavaScript. Other than that, it works very well for regression cycles. Getting the email-triggering functionality was also very good. If you want to have a lot of automation and run it on a regular basis, it's one of the recommended tools.

It's straightforward for me. I've been using Postman for a while. You can just directly download Postman from the web and use the version on your desktop. It takes minutes to download the EXE file and install that. It takes around 10 to 15 minutes.

Its updates are not very frequent. It's once every six months or one year. There are not many failures in Postman.

We are using its free version.

You can just give it a try. You can start with the free version and later upgrade to the paid ones. You would be able to do most of the things through the free version of Postman.

You can just learn the basic commands of Postman, various types of authentications, and the basics of API. You can learn how to send the environment variables, how to set the headers, etc. If you know all these things, it's very easy to use the Postman tool on a daily basis.

It's a very good product. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We are primarily using the solution for API testing. We do some automation and validation.

The solution offers automation execution. You can do automation very quickly. We can access the variables. The environment setup is over there, and we can utilize it.

We can execute validations. 

We can get reports very fast. The generation allows us to share those with end users and stakeholders. 

We can access the solution quickly via a SSO.

It can scale well.

It is stable and does not lag.

The initial setup is easy.

Reporting can be better. If you have bigger APIs, it takes time. The process should be faster and more automated. We'd like more visualizations. 

I've been using the solution for three or four years. 

I'd rate the stability eight or nine out of ten. There are no lag issues. It's easy to use and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. 

There are multiples for API testing. The scaling is fine. I'd rate the ability to extend eight out of ten. 

The solution works well at the enterprise level. 2,000 to 5,000 people are in that company. It's quite compatible with a range of company sizes. 

I've never used technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. 

We do have another tool. We are using Jmeter, among others. However, I do not like its look and feel. Postman allows for saving collections and has a nice look and feel. 

The initial setup is simple. It's not overly complex. We have a desktop version and downloaded it to laptops.

I am an end-user.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I've been happy with its capabilities so far.