Robocorp Reviews

I have different use cases including loan processing, image automation and web automation.

I have worked with UiPath and Automation Anywhere previously. Robocorp offers an improved development style and support as well as flexibility of its tools. You can easily develop custom libraries in Robocorp.

We use the latest version of the process studio and it takes up a lot of CPU storage. In our case, this has been up to 14 GB of storage. 

I have been using this solution for six years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I use Slack very actively to get support for this solution. 

The initial setup is very easy and I installed the on-prem version myself. Deployment took less than 30 minutes. First I installed the process studio, then the assistant, followed by the RCC. We then pushed the code to GitLab and to the production environment.

We completed the implementation in-house and only one person was needed. It is not a difficult solution to maintain. 

When working with Automation Anywhere and UiPath, it's very difficult to write custom libraries while using Robocorp, I can easily write libraries and import them. 

I would recommend this solution to other users due to its scalability and number of features.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

My primary use case has been developing processes in Robocorp. It's an open-source library. It's fantastic for use as a comparison to another tool. It has very fast execution and it's platform-independent. We can develop a robot for Mac, Linux, and Windows also.

The features of the solution are really good. We are starting to transfer the process from UiPath to Robocorp. 

An additional feature I'm looking for in Robocorp is SAP automation.

I have six months experience using the solution.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We currently have 10 people working with it.

There is a Slack channel that we use to reach technical support if we have any issue. We just put our issue on that Slack channel.

Before Robocorp, we were working on UiPath technology.

The initial setup is easy. We are in the initial phase because we started using Robocorp six months ago.

The solution is a very affordable price, and we don't need to pay high level amounts.

I wrote an article with advice for those considering this solution. It has very relevant and amazing information that I recommend reading.

I would rate Robocorp a nine out of 10 because the process execution and all features are very good. Time complexity is reduced. The execution speed is much higher. Another positive is that it's open source.

We use the software to automate the reports generation and update data in the external systems.

It's a cost-effective solution. I can use it as a library by importing Python scripts, allowing me to access its many features while working with coding.

The standard libraries in Robocorp should be more advanced. I have encountered limitations in some of the libraries. It would be beneficial if these libraries were more open-source, allowing other developers to contribute and add new features.

I have been using Robocorp for one year.

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the software's scalability a seven out of ten.

The technical support team is good. They respond very quickly and give appropriate answers.

The initial setup is easy.

The software's pricing is cost-effective.

UiPath and Robocorp are similar, but Robocorp's price plan stands out as more favorable. One of its significant advantages is the ability to import Python scripts and use them as additional script libraries. Moreover, it doesn't require extensive administrative knowledge. On the other hand, setting up UiPath involves complex configurations that can be time-consuming. With Robocorp, I didn't have to spend much time on the setup.

The price model for the product is excellent. Here we can try the features before buying it. As for Robocorp, I see its potential for smaller companies. They should create more advertisements for larger companies interested in the product. Overall, I rate it an eight out of ten.