We are using it for spectrum analysis, most frequency domain stuff, and phase noise measurements.
Hardware Engineer at Cisco Systems, Inc.
The product is good and efficient in terms of the measurements, but it is pretty repetitive to use
Pros and Cons
- "It is a more efficient, easier way to do measurements."
- "The instrument has a wide bandwidth, you can sweep across a wide range of frequencies, the resolution is good, and the accuracy is pretty good."
- "It would be good if they would try to automate most things because it has more pressing buttons and repetitive work. If there were automation scripts that they could provide, that would improve things."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It is a more efficient, easier way to do measurements.
What is most valuable?
- The instrument has a wide bandwidth. You can sweep across a wide range of frequencies.
- The resolution is good.
- The accuracy is pretty good.
What needs improvement?
It would be good if they would try to automate most things because it has more pressing buttons and repetitive work. If there were automation scripts that they could provide, that would improve things.
It would be good if they could go up to higher gigahertz bandwidths. Right now, the analyzer that we have is able to go to 10 GHz, and there's a lot of stuff going on at higher frequencies. I'm not sure if they have this product available in the market.
Buyer's Guide
Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are probably not using the full bandwidth of the product.
If it is upgradable, definitely we want to upgrade. We want to go to the higher bandwidths and are limited by the bandwidth of the product. Also, we want to go onto the higher frequencies.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't been in contact with the technical support or vendor.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did a comparison with the Keysight product, and the resolution of Keysight was more efficient and better compared against Rohde & Schwarz.
What other advice do I have?
The product is good and efficient in terms of the measurements, but it is pretty repetitive to use.
The application base that the solution is targeting is a high-speed serial technology. We measure phase noise. The spectrum analyzer that we're using is an important criteria to characterize the things that we want.
There is definitely a learning curve. To get used to the system, it will probably be two or three days. It's not much time. It's pretty easy, but most of the time, you have to repeat everything.
The user interface is pretty good. The menu functions are available right on the screen. For the analyzer that we are using, it has most of the button things and there is no touch screen to it. You pretty much figure out what's going on and you just have to press the buttons.
We are not using it for IoT development.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Design Engineer at Xilinx, Inc.
This product makes my life easier, results better, and speeds up my work
Pros and Cons
- "I have been able to do quality measurements that I have been unable to achieve with the equipment from some other vendors."
- "Since I spend quite some time in the lab, this product makes my life easier, results better, and speeds up my work."
- "There was a learning curve. Their user interface and the way that their products work are not intuitive to somebody who switches from other vendors, like Keysight or LeCroy."
What is our primary use case?
We use it to measure power supply noise.
We are using a couple of types of oscilloscopes from the RTO®2000 product line. We use the spectrum analyzer and signal source analyzer.
How has it helped my organization?
I have been able to do quality measurements that I have been unable to achieve with the equipment from some other vendors. Since I spend quite some time in the lab, this product makes my life easier, results better, and speeds up my work.
What is most valuable?
For real-time oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz has a pretty robust solution.
- It's compact.
- It has low channel noise.
- I appreciate their customer support.
- It specifically targets voluntary applications, which is what I'm doing. E.g., I have to do a lot of wattage noise measurements for supply and distress.
So, it is a good match for the sort of things that I need to do.
What needs improvement?
There was a learning curve. Their use interface and the way that their products work are not intuitive to somebody who switches from other vendors, like Keysight or LeCroy. At first, I had to be walked through every step because every time I guessed where to find a function, I would guess wrong.
Once you learn the user interface, it's very nice. However, when you face it for the first time, it's tricky. You have to spend time with the product before you feel comfortable with it.
I would like to increase the range of our signal processing functions in our real-time oscilloscopes. Since they have been marketing their oscilloscope as universal or as a multi-purpose scope, it does very well for the supplying those measurements, but it is lacking in jitter measurements.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I might take advantage of the memory upgrade, because that is something that you can always use more of in a real-time scope.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have been very satisfied with their customer support. I know quite a few application engineers from Rohde & Schwarz and all of them are very helpful, knowledgeable, and easy to deal with.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
A good friend of mine suggested Rohde & Schwarz. Previously, I was using Keysight LeCroy, so I didn't really know about Rohde & Schwarz. I trust the person who suggested Rohde & Schwarz would be better than the competition. I tried it for myself (through a demo) and am now convinced that my friend's opinion of the product is true.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is very competitive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We tried Tektronix or Keysight LeCroy. I have nothing against LeCroy, as the company still uses it with some applications, specifically for voluntary measurements, our debugging tool, and multipurpose tool.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise someone to seriously consider using Rhode & Schwarz's equipment, especially if they have similar needs to mine.
Most of the time, I'm not measuring signals, I'm measuring noise. I'm measuring noise on the power supply. This is important because they are multiple components squeezing through a single chip, so the power supply is always stressed. They can interact and talk to each other, so you want to make sure that doesn't happen.
I use the full bandwidth of this solution.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Product Categories
OscilloscopesPopular Comparisons
RIGOL Oscilloscopes
Tektronix Oscilloscopes
Keysight Oscilloscopes
Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes
Anritsu Oscilloscopes
National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes
Yokogawa Oscilloscopes
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links










