No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Iam Lead at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Jul 14, 2026
Privileged sessions have been secured and audits are now simplified with transparent monitoring
Pros and Cons
  • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by contributing to a significant drop in compliance and audit overhead, aiding in the preparation of security audits that were previously chaotic, making the process much simpler now, and improving operational efficiency and admin satisfaction."
  • "One Identity Safeguard could be improved by providing a unified management experience, as historically it has been split into logical units, and it would be beneficial if they could provide out-of-the-box reports and visualization, addressing the high resource overhead for privileged analytics."

What is our primary use case?

Our main use case for One Identity Safeguard is privileged access management, where we need to secure control and monitor highly sensitive privileged accounts.

We use One Identity Safeguard for password storage and management for all privileged accounts, including admin accounts and service accounts. We also use it for Just-in-Time privileged access to provide the least privilege access possible for users.

What is most valuable?

One Identity Safeguard offers excellent features such as smart session auditing and forensics, transparent session proxy, password injection with no exposure, and real-time command and video blocking.

We rely most on smart session logging, smart session auditing, and forensics, which are valuable for our day-to-day tasks, along with password injection, which helps us securely pull passwords and automatically inject them into sessions, enhancing our security and aiding in auditing.

Regarding session proxy, One Identity Safeguard can sit on the network similar to a router, remaining completely transparent to both the user and the destination server while silently managing and injecting passwords and recording sessions in the background.

One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by contributing to a significant drop in compliance and audit overhead, aiding in the preparation of security audits that were previously chaotic, making the process much simpler now, and improving operational efficiency and admin satisfaction.

What needs improvement?

One Identity Safeguard could be improved by providing a unified management experience, as historically it has been split into logical units, and it would be beneficial if they could provide out-of-the-box reports and visualization, addressing the high resource overhead for privileged analytics.

Regarding One Identity Safeguard's AI capabilities, I believe they are still in the transformation phase, particularly with session monitoring, and once implemented fully, the advanced role mining and peer group analysis provided will help us improve further.

I cannot provide feedback on the accuracy and reliability of One Identity Safeguard's AI capabilities because we are not currently using the AI version; we may be deploying it next year.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using One Identity Safeguard for more than six years.

Buyer's Guide
Safeguard by One Identity
July 2026
Learn what your peers think about Safeguard by One Identity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, One Identity Safeguard is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard's scalability works effectively in our large organization, as it successfully handles everything we need.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for One Identity Safeguard is very good, providing timely responses based on the SLA, with high-priority tickets receiving responses within an hour. I would rate the customer support around eight.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before switching to One Identity Safeguard, we were using Thycotic Server, which was not as user-friendly, leading us to switch to One Identity Safeguard.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment of One Identity Safeguard was very quick, taking only one or two days.

The deployment affected our privileged users smoothly, as we transitioned from another solution where users adapted quickly due to One Identity Safeguard being user-friendly.

What about the implementation team?

We provided training for users that took approximately one week, plus one month of training for administrators, which was very helpful for getting everyone on board.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing One Identity Safeguard, we evaluated CyberArk, but it was more costly, which influenced our decision to consider One Identity Safeguard due to its lower cost.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others considering One Identity Safeguard is to define the architecture early, as it will be helpful, and to consider using One Identity Manager alongside it, as they can integrate effectively. I would rate this solution an eight overall.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jul 14, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Harshal Pachpande - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Operation Consultant at SecurView
Real User
Top 5
Jul 24, 2026
Centralized vaulting has secured privileged access and simplifies automated credential rotation
Pros and Cons
  • "Regarding the usability and functionality, the UI is quite intuitive and simple to handle for new users."

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been working with Safeguard by One Identity platform for the last one year, which is the PAM solution. We are using it as a Privileged Access Management solution as a point of security, as the first point of security towards managing PAM and PIM. We use it for securely managing privileged credentials, controlling administration access, and monitoring privileged sessions. We also monitor the vaults for compliance of the logs, which have been forwarded to our SIEM platform for further security controls and monitoring.

    We use it for our privileged sessions, which has been acting as a centralized password vaulting and automated credential rotation platform. The automated credential rotation feature is the best feature I have used, and I have never seen it in different products as of now.

    The onboarding was seamless. We have onboarded approximately 500 to 1000 users to the PIM. Certain users have certain accesses that need to be limited over specific time frames and as per their administrative requirements. This has been managed through that platform, and we have not observed any kind of issues.

    Secure Remote Access feature is for our hybrid and remote employees, safeguarding our environment from external threat actors and preventing attackers from trying to access our network by using this Remote Access Privileged Access feature.

    The integration was quite easy. We have FortiGate and FortiClient VPN in place, and it has been a seamless integration with this platform, enabling us to get access to the Remote Access feature over OneLogin. We are now managing and getting access to our critical systems by using the jump host available with this feature.

    This integration has improved our enhanced security. It has been acting as a centralized vault which reduces our risk of credential theft, misuse of credentials, and prevents compromised hosts and privileged accesses to our critical hosts through this integration.

    I would rate this at eight.

    What is most valuable?

    The features I find most valuable are the password vaulting and the auto-rotation features like password security complexities and the OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. It is suggested to rotate the password into certain time frames which are recommended by the security team, and this has been performed by using this application. We have been monitoring session monitoring via the SIEM tool. These logs have been forwarded there. MFA integration is also available, which has been helped by One Identity. We have managed OneLogin and One Identity implementations into our organization, and these real-time privilege alerts and vault alerts are being monitored. These are quite valuable things for us.

    The features I liked the most about Safeguard by One Identity are the password vaulting and the automatic password rotation feature. MFA integration with the OneLogin platform was seamless as the organization is the same for them. Detailed audit logs are also available while clearing our audits. While troubleshooting, we need those audit logs, which have been forwarded over the SIEM, with reports sent to the admin team to get those reviewed if there are any certain changes made by the team which are not known to them.

    Privileged users and systems are getting protected by using these solutions, and all privileged users access this portal with their credentials quite easily. It has been eliminating their overhead to manage this manually or access manually. Admin overhead gets reduced due to it, and the overall efforts are reduced.

    There were no negatives observed. All observations were positives like the self-service access granted to users. Users can request privileged access to the portal, reducing dependencies on administration for every request. Built-in approval workflows are also available, so all these efforts have been reduced from manual ones.

    What needs improvement?

    I would like to highlight a couple of points, which are UI modernization. In the new world of AI, we are thinking about how AI can be helpful for detection capabilities in PAM solutions and easier reporting flexibility. There should be a chatbot feature in Safeguard by One Identity so we can easily find out the SOPs and documentations. By using chatbots, we can directly ask queries to them, and they can respond with the solution or steps.

    The chatbot is the only suggestion I have as of now.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I have not observed any stability issues.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    As of now, we have implemented it for more than 250 users, and there have been no issues observed. It has been scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    The setup was quite simple and easy for us, with help from the support team, which has been quite helpful for us in implementing this feature.

    The vendor support was with us during the implementation phase. They helped us with the initial implementation and all of the documentations.

    For end users, we have rolled out SOPs on how to manage and access the tools which are in the environment and critical servers. The SOPs have been built for that. For management, training sessions have been introduced by this vendor like OneLogin.

    The team was there to support us in terms of integrations.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    This is our first PAM solution.

    How was the initial setup?

    The setup was quite simple and easy for us, and getting help from the support team, which has been quite helpful for us in implementing this feature.

    Regarding the setup, it was quite easy and intuitive for us to get to know how we can onboard it. All the SOPs and the documentations are available on their portal, so it was easy.

    What about the implementation team?

    The vendor support was with us during the implementation phase. They helped us with the initial implementation and all of the documentations.

    This has been integrated with our SIEM platform, which is the central monitoring platform for the SOC environment for cybersecurity. The team has built certain use cases related to the threat environment for abnormality detection, unusual logins, and false logins. Such use cases have been built into the SIEM platform. This is the external integration.

    The integration into the SIEM platform was supported by the syslog method, which has forwarded these logs. It was supported so that all of these details have been transferred to the SIEM easily, and all the fields and logs have been mapped as per the supported mechanism.

    What was our ROI?

    It took approximately three months to go into production.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I was not part of the admin team evaluating alternate solutions, so I am unable to answer this question. I am the user of this product as of the date.

    What other advice do I have?

    Regarding the usability and functionality, the UI is quite intuitive and simple to handle for new users. Whenever new users are getting access to it, with the help of the documentations which are cleaner in format and easy to access, all of the things are in place with the help of the initial dashboards. We get to know what all of the functionalities are there.

    While considering Safeguard by One Identity, customers can do the POCs if they want to, but however, in terms of feature-wise, it is a good product to have. It has all of the features required for a PAM solution. I rate this solution at eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
    Last updated: Jul 24, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Safeguard by One Identity
    July 2026
    Learn what your peers think about Safeguard by One Identity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
    906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Shrinkhala Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
    Senior Manager at Agriculture Skill Council of India
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    May 24, 2026
    Privileged access has become more secure and threat behavior analysis improves client trust
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard is a game changer for us, especially for rapid business expansion and building trust with our clients."
    • "The only thing that we are looking for is to reduce the false alarming in the system to better analyze genuine concerns."

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the past three years. One Identity Safeguard is one of our champion PAM tools that our organization uses. We started using One Identity Safeguard for our very premium accounts and clientele accounts where there were a lot of cyber threats or cybersecurity issues.

    With our privileged accounts, the main issue we face is doing any sort of integration through API, as that becomes very susceptible to threat attacks. We are using PAM tools during our API integration to ensure security.

    What is most valuable?

    There is one thing that we are currently focusing on, which is detecting behaviors or threat behaviors to improve our analysis of threat detection.

    As I mentioned earlier, this past trend analysis of all these threat attacks, flagging up the red issues, is something very good and happens in a proactive manner. One Identity Safeguard has definitely strengthened our operational security because what they do is combine your password with a secure solution and analyze any deviations such as unusual password activity.

    One Identity Safeguard is a game changer for us, especially for rapid business expansion and building trust with our clients.

    What needs improvement?

    The only thing that we are looking for is to reduce the false alarming in the system to better analyze genuine concerns.

    I need more improvement on the product trials and the signup features. Easing the initial deployment would benefit new users. We have requested that real-time privileged threat analytics be made very customizable to the specific business and IT environments.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the past three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I will give a stability rating of more than 90 percent for One Identity Safeguard, as I have never seen it crash or slow down during updates.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We have seen enormous productivity enhancement, measured through client feedback, with our ratings never dropping below 4.2.

    How are customer service and support?

    We are always in touch with customer care, which is available 24/7, and issues are resolved through a ticketing solution very efficiently.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We were using a PAM solution from Automation Anywhere but switched due to issues with their licensing and lack of support.

    How was the initial setup?

    For us, it took three to four months because we had multiple layers of negotiation regarding pricing and licensing.

    What about the implementation team?

    For those who manage it, I think about one to two days of training is required, and existing users can use it within a few hours.

    What was our ROI?

    It was pretty seamless for them; this solution does not feel like a burden to them and they did not have to compromise their existing routines.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I would say the pricing was a bit on the higher side, but we had a good rapport that led to a favorable pricing model.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We have not been able to evaluate other options due to time constraints given by one of our clients.

    What other advice do I have?

    One Identity Safeguard is a one-stop solution for all your privileged account management needs, and I recommend experiencing it before making a decision. My recommendation is to choose One Identity Safeguard for a long, secure, sustainable future in managing privileged accounts. I gave this review an overall rating of 9 out of 10.

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: May 24, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Working at 3i Infotech
    Real User
    Top 10
    May 6, 2026
    Centralized privileged access has improved security, audits, and daily administration
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has improved our organization's security posture by providing centralized privileged access management, secure password vaulting, and session monitoring."
    • "One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are some areas for improvement."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is that it serves as a secure, strong PAM solution, and we are using it for PAM authentication.

    In daily work, we use One Identity Safeguard for privilege access management, including secure PAM authentication, password vaulting, access request approval, session monitoring, and automatic password rotation for privileged accounts and service servers.

    Apart from PAM authentication, we also use One Identity Safeguard for secure privileged session management, auditing, compliance, tracking, and centralized control for critical administrative accounts. It helps to improve security, accountability, and operational efficiency in daily infrastructure management.

    How has it helped my organization?

    One Identity Safeguard has improved our organization's security posture by providing centralized privileged access management, secure password vaulting, and session monitoring. It has helped to reduce manual password handling, improve compliance and audit tracking, and increase accountability for privileged access activities. Overall, it enhances operational security, streamlines access management, and reduces risks related to privileged accounts.

    We have seen improvements in multiple areas. It helped reduce risks related to privileged account misuse by enforcing secure password management and session monitoring. We also saved operational time through automated password rotation and centralized access control. From a compliance perspective, auditing and session recording made it easier during security reviews and audit processes, improving overall accountability and traceability.

    What is most valuable?

    One Identity Safeguard offers several strong features for PAM. The best ones are password vaulting, automatic password rotation, privileged session monitoring and recording, role-based access control, and approval workflows. I also appreciate the centralized log management, auditing and compliance reporting, and integration with Active Directory and enterprise environments. Features such as session playback, real-time monitoring, and REST API support are very useful for daily administration and security operations.

    The feature that has had the biggest impact on my daily operations is the password vaulting and automatic password rotation. It has significantly improved security by eliminating manual password sharing and reducing the risk of unauthorized access. It also saves operational time because administrators can securely request access through One Identity Safeguard without knowing the actual password. Session monitoring and auditing also help a great deal during troubleshooting and compliance reviews.

    One additional advantage is that it provides centralized control and complete audit visibility for privileged access activities.

    What needs improvement?

    One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are some areas for improvement. The initial deployment and integration process can be complex in large enterprise environments. The user interface and reporting can be improved to make administration and troubleshooting easier. More simplified integration with cloud platforms and third-party tools would also help.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the last three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is a stable and reliable PAM solution in our experience. We have seen good performance with minimal downtime, especially for password vaulting, session monitoring, and privileged access workflows. It handles enterprise environments well when properly configured and maintained.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is highly scalable and works well for enterprise environments. It supports scaling through clustering, distributed architecture, and high availability options, which helps handle growing numbers of privileged accounts, sessions, and users efficiently. In our experience, it has managed increasing workloads and integration without major performance issues.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support has generally been good in our experience. The support team is knowledgeable and helpful, especially for One Identity Safeguard's standard deployment, configuration, and troubleshooting issues. Response times are usually reasonable, although complex enterprise-level issues can sometimes take longer to resolve and require escalation.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Earlier, we were using a more manual approach along with basic privileged account management processes. We moved to One Identity Safeguard to improve centralized privileged access control, password vaulting, session monitoring, compliance, and overall security management in a more scalable and enterprise-ready way.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial deployment of One Identity Safeguard took a few weeks, including setup, integration with Active Directory, policy configuration, onboarding asset accounting, testing, and user access validation. The timeline mainly depended on the environment size and security requirements.

    What about the implementation team?

    One Identity Safeguard has been integrated with Active Directory, cloud platforms such as AWS and Azure, and various Windows and Linux servers for privileged access management. It also supports integration with enterprise applications, SIEM, log monitoring tools, and automation workflows to improve security and centralize access control.

    The integrations were manageable overall, especially with Active Directory and standard Windows and Linux environments. Cloud integration with AWS and Azure required additional planning and configuration, but the documentation and available connectors helped. Some advanced integration and custom workflows were more complex and required careful testing and coordination with security and infrastructure teams.

    A moderate level of training was required initially, mainly for administrators handling deployment, policy management, integration, and troubleshooting. For end-users, only basic guidance was needed for the access request and password retrieval workflows. Overall, the team adapted quickly after hands-on usage.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen a positive return on investment. One Identity Safeguard helped reduce the manual effort for password management and privileged access handling, which saves operational time for administrators. It also improved compliance and audit readiness, reducing time spent during security reviews. While it did not directly reduce headcount, it improved efficiency and centralized control and reduced security risks related to privileged accounts.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade PAM solution, so the cost is on the higher side.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    During the evaluation phase, we also looked at other PAM solutions such as CyberArk, BeyondTrust, and Delinea. We compared them on security features, integration, deployment complexity, session monitoring, password vaulting, scalability, and overall operational requirements before selecting One Identity Safeguard.

    What other advice do I have?

    The deployment was relatively smooth with minimal disruption for privileged users. Initially, users needed some adaptation to the access request and approval workflow. After onboarding and training, the process became streamlined and improved overall security.

    The integration improved operational efficiency and security by centralizing privileged access management, reducing manual password handling, and improving visibility through auditing and session monitoring. It also helps streamline access workflows across multiple platforms and environments.

    The advice would be to properly plan the PAM implementation before deployment, especially around privileged account discovery, access policies, integration, and user onboarding. Start with the critical systems first and then gradually expand across the environment. Also, involve security, infrastructure, and compliance teams early in the process. I have given this review an overall rating of ten.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: May 6, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Data Manager at Gitarattan International Business School
    Real User
    Top 5
    Jan 4, 2026
    Privileged access has become more controlled and auditable but the interface still needs simplification
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable."
    • "One Identity Safeguard could be improved by simplifying the user interface and initial configuration process, especially for first-time users."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is for privileged access management to control, monitor, and secure access to critical systems, servers, and applications used by administrators and IT teams.

    A quick specific example of how I use it for privileged access management in my environment is that when an administrator needs access to a critical server, they request access through One Identity Safeguard instead of using shared credentials. The system grants time-bound, approved access, rotates the password automatically after the session, and records the entire activity.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features One Identity Safeguard offers include Privileged Password Vaulting as the first one. The strongest features are Session Recording and Password Vaulting with rotation and Just-in-Time Access, which together give strong control and visibility and audit readiness.

    The Session Recording feature specifically helps my team and makes things easier for audits or investigations by giving a clear, time-stamped playback of privileged activities. It removes guesswork, speeds up audits, and ensures full accountability for admin actions.

    One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable.

    What needs improvement?

    One Identity Safeguard could be improved by simplifying the user interface and initial configuration process, especially for first-time users. More customizable reporting and clear in-app guidance would also help teams onboard faster and get deeper insights without additional effort.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for about one year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is very stable and can handle the workload easily; I have not seen any downtime.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard scales well as the environment grows. It handles increasing numbers of privileged accounts, sessions, and cloud targets without performance issues, making it suitable for expanding and hybrid infrastructure.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support has been responsive and knowledgeable, being effective at resolving technical issues.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Negative

    How was the initial setup?

    The integration with my cloud environment and infrastructure systems was moderately easy. Core cloud and infrastructure integrations were straightforward with proper documentation, while fine-tuning policies and access workflows required some initial effort. Once configured, the integrations have been stable and reliable.

    Administrators required moderate training to understand configuration, policies, and workflows, while end users needed minimal training since access requests and approvals are straightforward. Overall, onboarding was manageable with some initial guidance.

    What was our ROI?

    I have seen a return on investment through reduced audit effort and fewer security incidents related to privileged access, along with significant time savings for IT and security teams by automating access control and password management.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is on the higher side, but aligns with the security and compliance value it provides. Setup costs were mainly related to initial configuration and training, and licensing was straightforward.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I evaluated other options such as CyberArk and BeyondTrust before choosing One Identity Safeguard.

    What other advice do I have?

    User feedback has been generally positive around the solution's security and session recording and access control capabilities. However, some users have mentioned that the interface and initial learning curve could be more intuitive, especially for new or non-specialist users.

    My advice for others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is to clearly define your privileged access use cases and policies before implementation. It gives stronger security and audit capabilities, but investing time in proper planning, setup, and training will help you get the most value from the solution. I would rate this review a 7.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Jan 4, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Vishal Koovaparambil - PeerSpot reviewer
    Server Security Analyst And Solution at Digitaltrack
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Jun 5, 2026
    Centralized privileged access has improved security, compliance, and session oversight
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization in many ways by providing privileged access security and improving compliance."
    • "I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is as our centralized privileged access management, which is the PAM system, to safely store administrative passwords and also restrict temporary access and record high-risk sessions.

    Whenever our third-party vendor or any internal team engineer needs temporary administrative access to fix any kind of database or One Identity Safeguard issues, a timed credential that automatically expires is issued. The entire troubleshooting session is recorded for security.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features One Identity Safeguard offers include secure credential vaulting, live session recording and playback, and just-in-time access workflows that prevent engineers from having permanent admin rights.

    I find myself relying most on the live session recording feature. Being able to look up a specific command used during an administrative session and jump directly to that video timestamp makes finding security or operational mistakes very quickly, which is valuable for us.

    One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization in many ways by providing privileged access security and improving compliance. The overall access management, the better visibility we are getting into user accounts, and the better compliance controls are helping us in many ways.

    What needs improvement?

    I think the initial setup of One Identity Safeguard could be more simplified, and the dashboard customization could also be improved. Apart from this, the feature sets and the efficiency of the solution are very outstanding.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for more than three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is excellent.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support is very helpful in nature, and they provide good support to us in troubleshooting complex issues.

    I rate the customer support nine out of ten.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We have not switched from a different solution; we have been using One Identity Safeguard since the start.

    How was the initial setup?

    The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took three to seven weeks.

    What about the implementation team?

    The deployment of the solution did not affect my privileged users disruptively. It was straightforward because we have not faced any kind of challenge, and it had minimal impact. We just required a brief adjustment period for our team, but overall it was not disruptive. The biggest breakthrough was that it saved our time, and the deployment was very smooth, with the vendor team helping us significantly.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen a great return on investment with One Identity Safeguard due to its automation and AI capabilities.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    For the end-user training, we provided just a few hours of training, and they started using the solution without needing much training. For the solution management, we provided three to four weeks of training properly so they could manage it easily. Now we are able to handle it smoothly.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We have not evaluated other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would advise anyone looking for or considering One Identity Safeguard to carefully map out your asset hierarchy and account discovery rule before doing the main rollout. Spend time grouping your servers and target databases logically on paper first, and after that, you can go for the deployment.

    We have integrated One Identity Safeguard directly into our DevOps. Thanks to its API-first design, we hook it up into tools such as HashiCorp Vault, allowing our automated build system to securely pull hardcoded secrets and API keys dynamically during deployment.

    The integration with our DevOps tools was very smooth and easy.

    The feedback I have had from users regarding the solution's usability and functionality has been very positive.

    I would rate this review nine out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
    Last updated: Jun 5, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Ankush Kondewar - PeerSpot reviewer
    Senior Technical Support Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Apr 2, 2026
    Secure access has protected critical systems and now tracks all privileged activities
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by increasing visibility into privileged user activities, allowing us to track and audit all actions easily, which helps in compliance and security."

      What is our primary use case?

      One Identity Safeguard has been used by our organization for more than three years. The primary use case for One Identity Safeguard is to secure admin access to the servers and the network devices, which helps us to ensure only authorized users can access our critical systems and devices, and it also monitors all the privileged sessions.

      What is most valuable?

      One Identity Safeguard offers secure password vaulting, which ensures passwords are not shared or exposed, significantly improving security, and session monitoring and recording, allowing us to track all the admin activities easily.

      These features help our team day-to-day by eliminating password sharing among the admins and ensuring secure access to critical systems, which reduces security risks, while tracking and controlling privileged access prevents misuse of admin accounts and improves overall system security.

      One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by increasing visibility into privileged user activities, allowing us to track and audit all actions easily, which helps in compliance and security.

      What needs improvement?

      One Identity Safeguard provides great features with a smooth process and a very good amount of stability, so there is no need to improve as of now, but it might be required in the future.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been working in my current field for more than eight years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard is stable.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard's scalability matches our organization's growth over time with no issues.

      How are customer service and support?

      Customer support has a very helpful nature and is very responsive to our technical team when they require technical support, providing 24/7 assistance based on the given timeline.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      We have not evaluated any other options, as we had confirmed from day one that we were going to procure One Identity Safeguard.

      How was the initial setup?

      The deployment of the solution has taken less than one month, and it was a great experience. Regarding deployment, we have not faced any disruptive issues; it was very smooth for our privileged users, and after a short initial adjustment, they were able to access the system through One Identity Safeguard without issues, thanks to training and clear communication that minimized disruptions.

      What about the implementation team?

      The training requirement was very minimal, taking less than one week for training the employees, and once they had a good amount of knowledge about One Identity Safeguard, they were ready to go.

      What was our ROI?

      We have seen a good amount of return on investment, saving our employees time and money while providing security; it has helped us reduce manual efforts by around 30 to 40 percent.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      The experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward, and the sales team was very helpful during the procurement and implementation of the solution, making it a great experience.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      One Identity Safeguard has been the only solution used since day one.

      What other advice do I have?

      For any organization, whether mid-size or large, looking into using One Identity Safeguard, it will be a really good solution for managing accessibility to critical devices with great security features and automation. Planning deployment carefully and understanding access requirements is essential, so start with the most critical systems first and then go for the less critical ones. This review has been rated 9 out of 10.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises

      If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

      Other
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
      Last updated: Apr 2, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      Adiseshu Konathala - PeerSpot reviewer
      Cyber Security Idam Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
      Real User
      Top 20
      Jul 20, 2026
      Privileged access has become streamlined while cloud and legacy support still need improvement
      Pros and Cons
      • "Safeguard by One Identity offers simple web GUI, easy onboarding and management, and less complex architecture as its best features."
      • "I chose a rating of seven because I believe the product still has improvements that need to be made in terms of supportability for new applications, such as SaaS solutions, and it does not have any native method of managing cloud-based applications, which I believe is an area to improve."

      What is our primary use case?

      My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is privileged identity access management, session monitoring, and password management.

      In my day-to-day work, we onboard the most powerful accounts and privileged accounts across the applications, platforms, and network elements into the PAM system, which is Safeguard by One Identity, and it has the inbuilt capability that supports session management, password management, and analytics.

      What is most valuable?

      Safeguard by One Identity offers simple web GUI, easy onboarding and management, and less complex architecture as its best features.

      The web GUI and easy onboarding help my team because even less trained people can easily navigate it, and trained individuals can start using the tool easily without requiring any development or additional skills; it is easy to navigate and work on.

      Safeguard by One Identity has positively impacted my organization, as in the past, we were using TPAM, the older product from the same vendor of the Fab solution, but this is a new version, a new generation tool which supports most of the new version products and new protocols, and it works well.

      What needs improvement?

      Safeguard by One Identity has been built most of the time to support the most recent products and versions in the environment, but sometimes in real-time scenarios, companies might be running with legacy systems or applications; during that time, you might need to build a custom solution that is not flexible enough, and I think additional efforts are needed to build solutions to support legacy systems.

      I chose a rating of seven because I believe the product still has improvements that need to be made in terms of supportability for new applications, such as SaaS solutions, and it does not have any native method of managing cloud-based applications, which I believe is an area to improve.

      Regarding Safeguard by One Identity's AI capabilities, I do not believe it has really good governance and security; I think it probably needs to be upgraded to incorporate all AI agents or AI-specific security-related features which have not been covered in the current version.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been working in my current field for more than fifteen years.

      I have been using Safeguard by One Identity for more than five years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      In terms of Safeguard by One Identity's reliability, I believe it is fine, and we do not see any major problems with it.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      Since switching to this newer version, it improved compliance, the onboarding time reduced significantly, and it supports API calls and automation processes, so overall onboarding time has been significantly reduced.

      What other advice do I have?

      I would advise others looking into using Safeguard by One Identity to consider it if they are looking for a budget-friendly option, easy installation, and quick setup; however, if companies require many custom solutions and support for legacy environments, it might not be a good fit, and they may need to explore other options. If any environment is trying to work with newer tools or AI-specific protections, this tool is probably not evolved to that level, so I believe you need to assess your requirements first. I would rate this product a 7.5 out of 10.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      Last updated: Jul 20, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      reviewer2814237 - PeerSpot reviewer
      Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
      Real User
      Top 5
      Apr 17, 2026
      Privileged access has become controlled and monitoring now supports security and compliance
      Pros and Cons
      • "One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged."
      • "I think One Identity Safeguard could be improved by making the UI more user-friendly and simplifying some configurations, as it can feel a bit complex at times."

      What is our primary use case?

      I use One Identity Safeguard mainly for managing and securing privileged access like controlling admin accounts and monitoring sensitive sessions.

      For example, I use One Identity Safeguard to grant temporary admin access to users and track their sessions to make sure everything is secure.

      One Identity Safeguard also helps with password vaulting and automatic rotation.

      This means we don't have to share or manually manage sensitive credentials.

      We are using One Identity Safeguard in a hybrid setup, partly on-premises for sensitive access control and partly integrated with cloud services.

      We have integrated One Identity Safeguard with our cloud environment on Microsoft Azure and also with some internal DevOps workflows so privileged access can be controlled during the deployments and automation tasks.

      It was moderately easy overall to integrate One Identity Safeguard with our DevOps workflows and Microsoft Azure environment.

      Microsoft Azure integration was pretty smooth, but the DevOps workflow setup took a bit more effort to configure and test properly.

      What is most valuable?

      I think the best features One Identity Safeguard offers are strong password vaulting with auto-rotation, session monitoring and recording, and real-time alerts that help catch suspicious activity quickly.

      The real-time alerts from One Identity Safeguard are pretty reliable.

      Alerts come in quickly, and they have helped us respond faster to suspicious activity before it becomes a bigger issue.

      The session recording and audit logs from One Identity Safeguard really stand out.

      They make tracking and reviewing activity easy.

      But it would be even better if the UI was a bit more user-friendly.

      One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged.

      We have seen fewer security risks since access is controlled and monitored by One Identity Safeguard, and it definitely helped with compliance because all actions are logged and easy to audit.

      What needs improvement?

      I think One Identity Safeguard could be improved by making the UI more user-friendly and simplifying some configurations, as it can feel a bit complex at times.

      Reporting with One Identity Safeguard could be more detailed and easier to customize, and better integration with other tools would make the overall experience smoother.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using One Identity Safeguard for around one and a half years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard is generally stable and reliable in day-to-day use.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard is generally considered highly scalable and enterprise-ready.

      How are customer service and support?

      Customer support for One Identity Safeguard is generally good and knowledgeable, especially when it comes to technical issues and enterprise deployments.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      Earlier we were using a mix of manual access management and some basic PAM tools, but we switched to One Identity Safeguard for better automation, strong security controls, and easier auditing.

      How was the initial setup?

      Admins needed a bit of training for One Identity Safeguard, maybe a few days to get comfortable with policies and setup.

      But for end-users, it was pretty minimal since most of it runs in the background.

      It was mostly seamless for privileged users after deploying One Identity Safeguard.

      They just had to follow the new access request process, and after a short adjustment period, it didn't really disturb their daily work.

      What about the implementation team?

      We didn't purchase One Identity Safeguard through the Microsoft Azure Marketplace.

      We went through a direct vendor licensing process.

      What was our ROI?

      We have seen ROI with One Identity Safeguard mainly in reduced manual efforts and faster access handling.

      Roughly around 40 percent less time spent on managing privileged accounts, and also fewer security incidents that need manual intervention, which saved both time and operational costs.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      Pricing for One Identity Safeguard was on the higher side but justified by the security features.

      Setup cost was manageable and licensing is typically subscription-based per appliance or capacity, which makes it easier to scale but can add up in larger environments.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      We did evaluate a few options before finalizing One Identity Safeguard. The main ones we looked at were CyberArk, BeyondTrust, and several others.

      CyberArk was very strong but felt a bit complex and costly, and BeyondTrust was solid for remote access and monitoring.

      In the end, we chose One Identity Safeguard because it fit better with our hybrid setup and integration needs.

      What other advice do I have?

      One Identity Safeguard is a solid and reliable PAM solution in my experience.

      My advice would be to start with a clear access model before you deploy One Identity Safeguard. I would rate this review an 8 out of 10.

      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      Last updated: Apr 17, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      reviewer2803014 - PeerSpot reviewer
      Assistant IT Manager at Google
      MSP
      Top 10
      Mar 30, 2026
      Secure access has reduced password risks and now needs better support and fairer pricing
      Pros and Cons
      • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted us because the fear of theft of passwords or IDs has been reduced to almost zero, significantly enhancing our security."
      • "The customer support for One Identity Safeguard was not very good and definitely needs to be improved."

      What is our primary use case?

      My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to safeguard my password as well as my login IDs when I'm working from home, as it provides better safety for my passwords and for my login IDs.

      When we log in, we get two-factor authentication, which I use for safeguarding my passwords or login IDs while working from home, and that makes it safer compared to other software.

      One Identity Safeguard helps in keeping my login IDs and passwords safe, and that is very important to me.

      What is most valuable?

      The best feature that One Identity Safeguard provides is its flexibility, as well as the fact that it integrates well with other software like Salesforce, which I really appreciate.

      The integration part of One Identity Safeguard has been quite beneficial for my workflow, especially with tools like Salesforce.

      One Identity Safeguard is flexible and provides out-of-the-box integrations that have been very helpful for me, and the installation process was quite easy and smooth, which I would also rate as a feature.

      One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted us because the fear of theft of passwords or IDs has been reduced to almost zero, significantly enhancing our security.

      The reduction in password or ID theft risk with One Identity Safeguard has led to measurable changes as security incidents have been reduced, positively impacting us and increasing our efficiency.

      What needs improvement?

      In terms of improvement for One Identity Safeguard, I would like to say that the customer support needs to be improved and the pricing needs to be a bit more reasonable, as these are the two factors that require attention.

      Regarding customer support for One Identity Safeguard specifically, there has been lag and they are not very responsive, which needs to be improved immediately.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the past eight months.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard is stable.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      One Identity Safeguard's scalability is quite good, as it is scalable according to the needs of the enterprise.

      How are customer service and support?

      The customer support for One Identity Safeguard was not very good and definitely needs to be improved.

      How was the initial setup?

      The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took around three months.

      The deployment of One Identity Safeguard affected our privileged users seamlessly, without disruption.

      What about the implementation team?

      We use the on-demand version of One Identity Safeguard because it provides us flexibility, which was the main reason for choosing that version.

      What was our ROI?

      I can say we have seen a return on investment with One Identity Safeguard as we have saved a lot of time and manpower, although I cannot give a specific number for that.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      My experience with pricing for One Identity Safeguard indicated that the pricing was a bit high, while the setup cost was manageable and the licensing was acceptable; overall, the cost aspect was on the higher side.

      What other advice do I have?

      The feedback I have received from users regarding One Identity Safeguard's usability and functionality has been positive, as the usability aspect has been quite good and it is easy to learn and user-friendly.

      The training required to start using One Identity Safeguard was not very extensive, but a bit of training was needed, and it was a smooth process.

      If you are looking into using One Identity Safeguard, I would advise that if you are looking for user-friendly software that integrates well with other software, and if you do not mind spending a bit of extra money for that, then One Identity Safeguard is the go-to solution for you. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.

      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      Last updated: Mar 30, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free Safeguard by One Identity Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
      Updated: July 2026
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free Safeguard by One Identity Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.