Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SAS Data Integration Server Logo

Top 10 SAS Data Integration Server Alternatives

Vendor: SAS
3.6 out of 5
Leave a review

Top SAS Data Integration Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAS Data Integration Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), SSIS, and Azure Data Factory. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC is favored for its lower costs and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server attracts those prioritizing extensive analytics and data processing capabilities. Informatica IDMC offers faster deployment and ROI, while SAS is valued for its comprehensive functionality.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
Informatica IDMC offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup compared to SAS Data Integration Server, which can present higher initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup compared to SAS Data Integration Server, which can present higher initial setup expenses.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SSIS excels in seamless Microsoft integration and efficient ETL, appealing to those prioritizing cost and ease of deployment. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server's advanced analytics and scalability attract enterprises needing extensive data solutions, justifying its higher investment for complex projects.
Download SAS Data Integration Server vs. SSIS Report
SSIS has a lower setup cost compared to SAS Data Integration Server, making it a budget-friendly option, while SAS offers comprehensive features that justify its higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS has a lower setup cost compared to SAS Data Integration Server, making it a budget-friendly option, while SAS offers comprehensive features that justify its higher initial expense.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers powerful ETL capabilities and complex data workflow handling. In comparison, Azure Data Factory excels in cloud-native architecture and real-time processing. SAS is preferred for its support and reliability, while Azure appeals with scalability and flexible pricing.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server involves higher setup costs compared to Azure Data Factory, which offers a cost-effective initial setup. Azure Data Factory's lower setup expenses make it a more budget-friendly option for organizations starting data integration projects.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server involves higher setup costs compared to Azure Data Factory, which offers a cost-effective initial setup. Azure Data Factory's lower setup expenses make it a more budget-friendly option for organizations starting data integration projects.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter offers lower setup costs and quick ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server's advanced analytics capabilities justify its higher price for those prioritizing comprehensive data analysis, making it suitable for long-term strategic goals in data-driven environments.
Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
Informatica PowerCenter typically involves higher setup costs compared to SAS Data Integration Server, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, though the features and performance may differ to justify the cost variance.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter typically involves higher setup costs compared to SAS Data Integration Server, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, though the features and performance may differ to justify the cost variance.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers robust integration and budget-friendly setup, suitable for organizations prioritizing data volume processing. In comparison, Palantir Foundry provides enhanced analytics and collaboration, appealing to businesses seeking superior data insights and willing to invest in higher long-term returns.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server has a lower setup cost compared to Palantir Foundry. Palantir Foundry includes more extensive features, which might contribute to its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server has a lower setup cost compared to Palantir Foundry. Palantir Foundry includes more extensive features, which might contribute to its higher setup cost.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator offers a cost-effective, efficient ELT architecture with wide data source support, appealing to those prioritizing price and ease of integration. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server supports advanced analytics, suitable for businesses needing comprehensive data analysis despite higher initial costs.
Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) requires a significant initial investment, while SAS Data Integration Server offers a more moderate setup cost. This distinction highlights the budget considerations users should account for when evaluating these data integration solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) requires a significant initial investment, while SAS Data Integration Server offers a more moderate setup cost. This distinction highlights the budget considerations users should account for when evaluating these data integration solutions.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers competitive pricing and seamless deployment with robust data management, attracting those prioritizing cost-efficiency and straightforward setup. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage appeals to those needing advanced features and scalability, justifying its premium cost for complex data demands.
Download IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server has a high initial setup cost, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage offers a more accessible setup price.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server has a high initial setup cost, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage offers a more accessible setup price.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAP Data Services excels in data integration and cleansing, appealing with high ROI due to efficient management. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server offers advanced analytics and data transformation, attracting tech buyers with flexible deployment and strong ROI through analytics capabilities.
Download SAP Data Services vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAP Data Services has a higher setup cost than SAS Data Integration Server. SAS Data Integration Server provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, contrasting with the higher expense associated with implementing SAP Data Services.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Data Services has a higher setup cost than SAS Data Integration Server. SAS Data Integration Server provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, contrasting with the higher expense associated with implementing SAP Data Services.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
Denodo excels in real-time data integration and virtualization, appealing to businesses prioritizing dynamic data access and easy deployment. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server offers extensive data transformation and management capabilities, ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive data solutions and are comfortable with detailed setup processes.
Download Denodo vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
I don't know the actual cost, but it's tens of thousands of dollars per month.
The licensing should be improved, as the cost per connector is quite expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
I don't know the actual cost, but it's tens of thousands of dollars per month.
The licensing should be improved, as the cost per connector is quite expensive.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server is ideal for complex environments with its strong integration and security features. In comparison, Alteryx Designer's ease of use and rapid deployment make it suitable for teams seeking flexibility and quick data processing with a competitive ROI.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server has a higher setup cost, whereas Alteryx Designer offers a more budget-friendly option. These differences highlight the distinct pricing models of both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server has a higher setup cost, whereas Alteryx Designer offers a more budget-friendly option. These differences highlight the distinct pricing models of both solutions.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System
4.4 out of 5
Ab Initio Co>Operating System excels in scalability and handling complex data tasks, making it ideal for those needing robust processing capabilities. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server, with its comprehensive analytical tools, is suited for buyers focused on in-depth data analysis and cost-effective solutions.
Download Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
Ab Initio Co>Operating System typically involves a higher setup cost, focusing on enterprise-scale projects, while SAS Data Integration Server offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to organizations with constrained financial plans.
View comparison
Pricing
Ab Initio Co>Operating System typically involves a higher setup cost, focusing on enterprise-scale projects, while SAS Data Integration Server offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to organizations with constrained financial plans.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers superior scalability and advanced analytics, ideal for complex workflows. In comparison, FME's extensive format support and user-friendly interface provide flexibility. SAS excels in data management; meanwhile, FME is preferred for ease of use and adaptability.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
dbt
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
dbt
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers a comprehensive suite ideal for enterprises needing extensive features and direct support. In comparison, dbt focuses on cost-effective, flexible data transformation with strong community support, making it attractive for businesses prioritizing simplicity and efficiency in a scalable solution.
Download SAS Data Integration Server vs. dbt Report
SAS Data Integration Server has a higher setup cost, while dbt offers a more affordable initial setup. SAS's pricing may reflect advanced features, whereas dbt's pricing is competitive for its target market.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server has a higher setup cost, while dbt offers a more affordable initial setup. SAS's pricing may reflect advanced features, whereas dbt's pricing is competitive for its target market.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
WhereScape RED appeals with its affordability and automation, streamlining deployment and reducing manual coding efforts. In comparison, SAS Data Integration Server offers extensive tools for complex integrations, delivering substantial ROI over time despite higher upfront costs, making it ideal for feature-focused buyers.
Download SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED Report
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
View comparison
Pricing
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server is ideal for robust ETL capabilities and extensive data modeling, supporting complex transformations. In comparison, Qlik Compose offers automation and real-time data warehousing, delivering fast insights. SAS demands infrastructure but excels in complex environments; Qlik features easy cloud deployment.
Download Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six.
The price of the solution is expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six.
The price of the solution is expensive.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Unifi
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Unifi
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server is suitable for enterprises needing robust data quality management and integration capabilities. In comparison, Unifi is favored for its self-service features and modern collaboration tools, appealing to users looking for ease of use and quick deployment.
Download SAS Data Integration Server vs. Unifi Report
There is no license. The solution is free.
View comparison
Pricing
There is no license. The solution is free.
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
SAS Data Integration Server Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers comprehensive data management and is cost-effective for traditional infrastructures. In comparison, Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration, with advanced features, supports seamless application connectivity, appealing to organizations needing robust API management and willing to invest in scalable, cloud-based integration solutions.
Download Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server offers a streamlined setup with moderate costs, while Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration demands higher initial investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server offers a streamlined setup with moderate costs, while Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration demands higher initial investment for setup.

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Business Process Management (BPM)