ServiceNow IT Operations Management Reviews

The primary use case is mainly for our daily tracking of tickets, creating a dashboard to check the SLA or if any ticket is open or closed if any got breached. 

The solution has improved from version to version. Earlier there was no option for the dashboard, so it used to check manually and do incident tracking to figure out the details of the ticket, like the pending or the open task. But as per the current trend, when the dashboard got introduced, it was very quick. It's kind of like, I will say, a one-touch or a one-stop market for getting all the details of the ticketing information.

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation, which is recently integrated. The reason being in the dashboard, it is very easy to see the graph of the pending task. Or you might say if any ticket or anything got SLA breached or even to whom what task is assigned to, for how long. Everything can be tracked from the dashboard.

I would like more manual issues to have automated report-facing options.

I have been using the solution for a few years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable from time to time.

The initial setup is very straightforward. A person just needs to join a team to access the network and that's all.

The deployment was completed in-house.

There is definitely a return on investment with this solution.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is used wherever there is an operations activity in our organization. It is hard to say exactly how many people are using the solution but it is a lot.

We have a support team that consists of six to eight people used for deployment and maintenance.

We definitely have plans to increase the usage of the solution, because, considering the current market trend, the ServiceNow IT Operations Management usage will increase in long run.

I recommend this solution. The reason is it's cost-effective, number one. Number two, many of the processes got recently automated in it, like checking the major incidents. When triggered, it will be notified according to the configuration set. Any people can create a dashboard to get a quick view of the SLS.

I use the solution in my company for general incident management and service request management.

The solution's most valuable features are the tool's seamless integration with the configuration management database and the possibility of communicating with end users. For case management, there were very good solutions that allowed you to integrate with tools outside the platform.

The licensing model of the product is a bit rigid, and it can be a bit difficult to downscale if your needs change while also being expensive. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product. If you are buying an expensive tool, it is because it is the best tool in many ways, but you don't always need the best product if your demand or your requirements aren't very advanced. One should be very realistic about the requirements and be sure that you actually need a tool that is very expensive.

The tool's scalability can be improved. If your needs require downscaling, the tool won't have the same flexibility.

I have been using ServiceNow IT Operations Management for six months. I have been an end user of the tool. In my previous employment, I was working as a reseller of the tool.

It is a very stable solution.

Downscaling can be a problem, but upscaling is not a problem.

The technical support for the solution is very good. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The product's installation phase can be described as a medium-range process.

During the product's installation phase, the conversion of the request cases from an older tool to ServiceNow was rather challenging and required a lot of manual work.

Five people can install the product.

The product is easy to maintain.

The solution can be deployed in half a year.

With the tool, it is very easy to make a good business case even though it is quite a bit expensive since it really speeds up workflows and we can do a lot more with the product.

The solution is costly compared to the products offered by its competitors.

I haven't been using the tool continuously because I am a consultant. In some earlier projects, I was using the tool. I have never been an intensive user of the tool but have been a project manager for the implementation of ServiceNow for a customer at some point that took me six months.

The asset management capabilities of the tool are good.

The search functions actually give you suggestions from the uses and cases and the integrations with other sources of information that synthesize a very good summary for the end users and for case management.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

ITOM communicates information about incidents and maintains them. It handles tickets change, manages service networks, and reduces IT service downtime for the organization.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is an easily configurable SaaS product and there is no other capability that can compare to the functionality and organization. 

With ServiceNow, we can do almost everything for your organization, be it ticketing, maintenance, infrastructure maintenance, software, hardware, renewals, portfolio management, etc. It is easy to configure and scalable. Moreover, the business can do the configuration without the technical team.

The pricing of some modules is higher because they are sold in packages. If we need something specific, we cannot take it individually. Instead, we have to take it along with other functions or capabilities that we may not need. Additionally, certain specific packages are significantly more costly compared to the competition in the Service Desk domain. Therefore, the pricing model is an area of improvement for me. 

I have been using the solution for three years. We are a premier partner of ServiceNow.

The stability of ServiceNow is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

It is a scalable product.  We have 15 customers, using this solution.

Customer service and support were good. 

The initial setup is straightforward and easily intuitive. Moreover, ServiceNow can be deployed both on the cloud and on-prem. 

It is a normal ACLC. It's kind of similar to SaaS products' implementation, which is a step-by-step procedure. So when we pay, ServiceNow will provide a subscription-based model.

ServiceNow has a subscription-based model, and our customers use the yearly-based license.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would definitely recommend using this solution. 

I use the tool to create tickets and solve incidents. It also helps us to check and review dashboards and present them to the management. 

I am impressed with the tool's ability to track information in an easy way. 

The product needs to add a workflow insight tool. 

The solution is stable. 

The tool is scalable and my company has 3000 users for the product. 

The product's setup is easy. 

I would rate the product a ten out of ten. 

We are using ServiceNow ITOM Health. We correlate alarms from different platforms and then use it for incident management.

It is flexible. You can tune it, more or less, as you want.

My managers would say that the price is too high. We wanted to also have the visibility version of it, but it's too expensive for us. Going for visibility would have doubled up the price.

I have been using this solution for one and a half years.

It seems stable.

It seems scalable. I'm configuring it and sending the events or the incidents to about 30 people.

I have had one case or so, and their support was fine.

It was easy to set up. The deployment was done in small steps. It took a few months to have it tuned and set up because a lot of different inputs had to be configured.

We did it ourselves.

It is expensive. It is around 10 Euros per server per month.

It is a platform. So, you can extend it to a lot of areas. You should design it well from the start because it can do a lot. It would be good to have an experienced consultant come in and show what it can do to the management so that they can see the value of it. There are values in it, but sometimes, it's difficult for management to see them because they, more or less, think about the costs.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.

Our clients use ServiceNow IT Operations Management to manage their IT infrastructure, that is, to track all their servers and storage.

The solution is deployed on the cloud provided by ServiceNow.

I have found Discovery, CMDB, and service mapping to be valuable features.

There are some limitations with Discovery; some areas are not available in the installation. I would like the solution to be able to discover more devices. That will remove the need to have multiple tools.

I've been working with this solution for seven years.

I would rate the stability of the solution at nine out of ten.

It is a highly scalable solution, and I would rate the scalability at nine out of ten. Approximately 300 operations team members heavily use the solution. We have a mix of clients, but most of them are medium- to enterprise-level organizations.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management's technical support is good, and I'd rate it at seven out of ten. Sometimes, we have to follow up with them.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup at six. It is neither too easy nor too difficult. ServiceNow IT Operations Management is not a straightforward solution, and the deployment can take one to two years.

We gather the scope from the customers, create a high level design, and then implement it.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is a costly solution. I'd rate the price at ten, on a scale from one to ten with one being the lowest and ten being the highest price. Some clients do have a problem with the price, but most find that the solution is worth the cost.

I would recommend ServiceNow IT Operations Management and rate it at nine out of ten. It is a market leader and is very implementation-friendly. Developers have a clear understanding of how the solution works, and it is mature enough to handle different client needs.

My company primarily uses the solution for managing our application catalog, incident management, and as a configuration management database. We also use it for lifecycle management over our applications.

In terms of features, the main advantage of the application services is the centralization of various types of information. For instance, if you manage a customer-facing business, having a system for managing incidents would be extremely beneficial. Additionally, the service level agreements associated with incidents is another important feature. The built-in dashboards provide helpful out-of-the-box reports and support while monitoring key metrics. Overall, these features have made the solution highly advantageous for our needs.

Regarding ServiceNow, there is room for improvement in terms of customization, particularly in the area of self-customization. Organizing organizational information and building custom dashboards and reports is not as easy or intuitive as we would like. We either need to rely on our technical services team to handle these tasks or seek vendor assistance or professional services to extend the solution's capabilities. Ideally, we would like to build and maintain these customizations in-house, but this is currently not as feasible as we hope.

Regarding the features I want to see in the solution's future releases, I will prioritize integrations. Specifically, I would like easier integrations into some Microsoft Technology Stack, including Power BI and other dashboards. This would enable us to consolidate information across different technologies and view it from a holistic ITSM perspective that incorporates other platforms, KPIs, and metrics we measure outside of ServiceNow.

I have been using ServiceNow IT Operations Management for six months. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I am using.

It is a stable solution. I have not experienced any system outages during my time using the solution. However, we have not fully utilized all of its capabilities, including features such as the mobile application. Moving forward, we plan to explore and leverage the entire suite of enterprise applications, including mobile apps. So, we are currently looking into using quick steps to achieve this in the solution.

Approximately 800 people in our organization use the solution. However, around 30 to 40 people actively monitor and use the solution daily, primarily from our IT services department.

I have not personally contacted the technical support team for the solution. In our organization, specific teams appointed by management are responsible for contacting the technical support team when needed.

I wasn't involved in the initial setup process of the solution.

The solution is worth the money due to the visibility and technical capabilities it provides our organization. However, we will likely have more opportunities to utilize the platform and its functions better. Therefore, there are certainly opportunities for improvement.

I suggest those planning to use the solution that if their organization has the budget and intends to utilize the tool, I recommend it. In our procurement process, my organization looked at industry reports to determine the leading technologies in the space. As a result, ServiceNow was identified as one of the leaders and considered one of the candidates. Afterward, we underwent a full RFP process and product selection process to compare it with other products in the market.

The product is quite mature, especially in ITSM, and ServiceNow does an excellent job in its space. The solution has been fairly stable when deployed on the cloud. However, ServiceNow is not attempting to expand into other spaces or enhance its capabilities with low code, no code applications, etc. This is where I see some room for improvement or further maturity to be gained.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is used primarily for operations management. 

We had a lot of events and some of the things that have been done manually. Now, when an email is sent, it'll create a task, and your teams can handle it. Having Event Management, we create events and alerts, so everything is streamlined.

The suite is pretty strong. Everything is consolidated into one, which is helpful. Before that, if a switch went down, we'd get 600 tickets. Now, we get only one. Pretty much everyone is happy with how it has streamlined everything.

It helps streamline management and processes. 

It's stable.

Support can be helpful. 

The Discovery needs to become more functional.

Service mapping is pretty limited.

It has a complex initial setup.

I've been using the solution for two years. 

With Event Management and orchestration, it's stable and reliable. The immigration hub, we use it a lot. However, as far as discovery and service mapping goes, it kind of falls short.

We haven't tried to scale the solution at this point. 

We have up to ten to 12 people using the solution right now. 

At this point, we have no plans to increase usage. 

Support is okay. However, it would depend on the person we got. Sometimes we would get someone who would just say, "Oh, it's not our problem," and then close the task. Sometimes we would get someone who actually realized these were the limitations, and they would work with personal development to get us a fix. Support is hit or a miss.

Neutral

We had homegrown software that pulled in all the details. On top of that, we had some other tools for Event Management.

The initial setup was pretty complex. It was about a nine-month process to implement it.

We need four to six people to deploy the solution and about two people to maintain the solution once it is set up. 

We had a couple of contractors come and help, however, for the most part, we have our own discovery admin, and I was leading the project, so it was a mix of in-house and external resources.

We might have seen an ROI. It might allow for break-even costs. It didn't provide as much value as we thought it would.

The licensing is paid every three years. I'm not sure of the exact pricing. 

The pricing was negotiated with the senior director. Procurement takes care of the cost, and the senior directors are involved. The managers and individual contributors know what they're signing up for and what features we're getting, however, not actually the cost of the software. 

We did not evaluate other options. 

We are end-users. 

We have our own data centers, and the solution exists in them. We use Operations Management pretty heavily.

If they're going for a fresh CMDB, then ITOM is a great product. If they have a fully grown, mature CMDB, then they may want to think twice about going to ITOM.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.