What is our primary use case?
The solution is used primarily for operations management.
How has it helped my organization?
We had a lot of events and some of the things that have been done manually. Now, when an email is sent, it'll create a task, and your teams can handle it. Having Event Management, we create events and alerts, so everything is streamlined.
What is most valuable?
The suite is pretty strong. Everything is consolidated into one, which is helpful. Before that, if a switch went down, we'd get 600 tickets. Now, we get only one. Pretty much everyone is happy with how it has streamlined everything.
It helps streamline management and processes.
It's stable.
Support can be helpful.
What needs improvement?
The Discovery needs to become more functional.
Service mapping is pretty limited.
It has a complex initial setup.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
With Event Management and orchestration, it's stable and reliable. The immigration hub, we use it a lot. However, as far as discovery and service mapping goes, it kind of falls short.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We haven't tried to scale the solution at this point.
We have up to ten to 12 people using the solution right now.
At this point, we have no plans to increase usage.
How are customer service and support?
Support is okay. However, it would depend on the person we got. Sometimes we would get someone who would just say, "Oh, it's not our problem," and then close the task. Sometimes we would get someone who actually realized these were the limitations, and they would work with personal development to get us a fix. Support is hit or a miss.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had homegrown software that pulled in all the details. On top of that, we had some other tools for Event Management.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was pretty complex. It was about a nine-month process to implement it.
We need four to six people to deploy the solution and about two people to maintain the solution once it is set up.
What about the implementation team?
We had a couple of contractors come and help, however, for the most part, we have our own discovery admin, and I was leading the project, so it was a mix of in-house and external resources.
What was our ROI?
We might have seen an ROI. It might allow for break-even costs. It didn't provide as much value as we thought it would.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is paid every three years. I'm not sure of the exact pricing.
The pricing was negotiated with the senior director. Procurement takes care of the cost, and the senior directors are involved. The managers and individual contributors know what they're signing up for and what features we're getting, however, not actually the cost of the software.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other options.
What other advice do I have?
We are end-users.
We have our own data centers, and the solution exists in them. We use Operations Management pretty heavily.
If they're going for a fresh CMDB, then ITOM is a great product. If they have a fully grown, mature CMDB, then they may want to think twice about going to ITOM.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.