ServiceNow IT Operations Management Reviews

The solution is used primarily for operations management. 

We had a lot of events and some of the things that have been done manually. Now, when an email is sent, it'll create a task, and your teams can handle it. Having Event Management, we create events and alerts, so everything is streamlined.

The suite is pretty strong. Everything is consolidated into one, which is helpful. Before that, if a switch went down, we'd get 600 tickets. Now, we get only one. Pretty much everyone is happy with how it has streamlined everything.

It helps streamline management and processes. 

It's stable.

Support can be helpful. 

The Discovery needs to become more functional.

Service mapping is pretty limited.

It has a complex initial setup.

I've been using the solution for two years. 

With Event Management and orchestration, it's stable and reliable. The immigration hub, we use it a lot. However, as far as discovery and service mapping goes, it kind of falls short.

We haven't tried to scale the solution at this point. 

We have up to ten to 12 people using the solution right now. 

At this point, we have no plans to increase usage. 

Support is okay. However, it would depend on the person we got. Sometimes we would get someone who would just say, "Oh, it's not our problem," and then close the task. Sometimes we would get someone who actually realized these were the limitations, and they would work with personal development to get us a fix. Support is hit or a miss.

We had homegrown software that pulled in all the details. On top of that, we had some other tools for Event Management.

The initial setup was pretty complex. It was about a nine-month process to implement it.

We need four to six people to deploy the solution and about two people to maintain the solution once it is set up. 

We had a couple of contractors come and help, however, for the most part, we have our own discovery admin, and I was leading the project, so it was a mix of in-house and external resources.

We might have seen an ROI. It might allow for break-even costs. It didn't provide as much value as we thought it would.

The licensing is paid every three years. I'm not sure of the exact pricing. 

The pricing was negotiated with the senior director. Procurement takes care of the cost, and the senior directors are involved. The managers and individual contributors know what they're signing up for and what features we're getting, however, not actually the cost of the software. 

We did not evaluate other options. 

We are end-users. 

We have our own data centers, and the solution exists in them. We use Operations Management pretty heavily.

If they're going for a fresh CMDB, then ITOM is a great product. If they have a fully grown, mature CMDB, then they may want to think twice about going to ITOM.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We use this solution for issue tracking because we have a lot of external customers. So if any of our customers have an issue with our product, they create a ticket, and our system integrates that ticket and allows us to track it end to end when it is open. Then our CEO or engineer can go to the site and fix the issue or change each piece of data. So we use this solution for all the life cycles.

IT support management is the most valuable feature and a very good product. It is easy to use and simple to learn. It has very good features.

The security policies could be increased.

We have been using this solution for about six years and are using the latest version.

The stability is great, and we rarely face any issues with the product. We have thousands of users using this solution.

It is a scalable solution.

Sometimes we require technical support from ServiceNow, and they respond quickly. I rate the technical support a four out of five.

We currently use Remedy, but I do not have details about it because another team uses it.

The initial setup was very simple, and we installed it quickly. We used the escapes to install the deployment and its safety. The deployment can be done in-house, and no technical guys are needed.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten. I strongly recommend ServiceNow IT Operations Management for issues tracking.

ServiceNow was one of the chosen ITSM tools in my previous organizations. So, we were leveraging CMDB and ITSM. We had the incident change, service management, and PA modules. It was primarily used for incident management and tracking the services' up-times and user requests. 

We were using ServiceNow ITOM at times for project management. It was customized to do the tracking. We had created something similar to a Kanban board to see how the processes and services were working.

When we started, it was on-prem, but then slowly, we migrated to the cloud.

It has been very useful for tracking. It has evolved a lot over time, and there is a single pane of glass where you can track and see everything.

At times, it got cumbersome from the project management perspective. It could have been because of the way we were using it. I found Microsoft Project to be more extensive and robust than ITOM.

I have been using this solution since 2012. I last used it about three months ago.

Overall, it's a stable solution.

It is highly scalable. One good thing is that ServiceNow has different plans. We can start with the basic plan and then slowly move to the higher plans.

I don't have much experience with their support. For ServiceNow, we had our own internal team. They used to first do the troubleshooting, and after that, if required, they used to further involve ServiceNow's support team.

Its initial setup is pretty straightforward and simple.

I haven't done an in-depth analysis, but I was looking at possibly alternating with Microsoft Project. ServiceNow is still evolving, whereas Microsoft has been a major player. When you compare, you look at three different quadrants. The first one is the price and operating cost. The second one is stability, and then there is scalability in terms of scaling up and down. One primary advantage that Microsoft has is that most of the organizations have already been using Microsoft 365 and other services. They get a bundled-up package with Microsoft Project. Everything is bundled up in a single package.

I would recommend this solution. ServiceNow is good from the incident management and service management perspective.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We are using ServiceNow ITOM Health. We correlate alarms from different platforms and then use it for incident management.

It is flexible. You can tune it, more or less, as you want.

My managers would say that the price is too high. We wanted to also have the visibility version of it, but it's too expensive for us. Going for visibility would have doubled up the price.

I have been using this solution for one and a half years.

It seems stable.

It seems scalable. I'm configuring it and sending the events or the incidents to about 30 people.

I have had one case or so, and their support was fine.

It was easy to set up. The deployment was done in small steps. It took a few months to have it tuned and set up because a lot of different inputs had to be configured.

We did it ourselves.

It is expensive. It is around 10 Euros per server per month.

It is a platform. So, you can extend it to a lot of areas. You should design it well from the start because it can do a lot. It would be good to have an experienced consultant come in and show what it can do to the management so that they can see the value of it. There are values in it, but sometimes, it's difficult for management to see them because they, more or less, think about the costs.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.

The most important features of ServiceNow IT Operations Management are the discovery service mapping and orchestration. 

The most complaints we have received from our clients are the solution's discovery aspect. I've heard a few concerns from the customers where we have to integrate with a third-party tool to make a full-fledged discovery along with ServiceNow. ServiceNow alone does not do the total capacity of the discovery. The discovery portion of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is not in-depth as what the customers are looking for. The information that it gathers from the assets is a little more limited than what other tools provide.

In an upcoming release, it would be a benefit to include the discovery of mobile assets.

I have been working with ServiceNow IT Operations Management for approximately four years.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is stable.

The scalability of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is excellent and it is one of the main selling points.

The support from ServiceNow IT Operations Management is good. However, they could be more helpful sometimes.

I would rate the support from ServiceNow IT Operations Management a four out of five.

The initial setup of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is not complex, it is fairly simple.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management pays for itself because of how flexible it is. It's a very strong tool.

The price of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is expensive.

I compared Tanium with ServiceNow IT Operations Management and I found that ServiceNow IT Operations Management is more flexible, suitable for development, and time to market is faster. Additionally, ServiceNow IT Operations Management has overall more features.

I rate ServiceNow IT Operations Management a seven out of ten.

We use the product for discovery and visibility management. 

I like the tool's discovery feature. 

The solution's licensing model is a bit complicated. It should be simple and easy for people to understand. 

I have been using the product for five years. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten. 

The product's setup is simple. 

I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten since there are vendors who are cheaper. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. The solution is for most customers but enterprise customers will face some restrictions with it. 

I use the tool to create tickets and solve incidents. It also helps us to check and review dashboards and present them to the management. 

I am impressed with the tool's ability to track information in an easy way. 

The product needs to add a workflow insight tool. 

The solution is stable. 

The tool is scalable and my company has 3000 users for the product. 

The product's setup is easy. 

I would rate the product a ten out of ten. 

We use ServiceNow for incident management. When an incident occurs, it is assigned to the respective team, who works on resolving the issue based on its severity level. We also define severity levels such as critical, medium, or minor.

Initially, some of our customers faced issues with the solution as they were not very familiar with it. We helped them identify and rectify the issues, such as incidents being assigned to the wrong teams due to group-related issues. Once we corrected these issues, our customers were satisfied with the solution's performance.

There is room for improvement in the stability of ServiceNow.

Overall, the performance and everything is good for the product. However, sometimes customers face issues related to misconfigurations, particularly related to respective groups. Other than that, the performance of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is good.

I have been using ServiceNow IT Operations Management for five to six years.

The stability is fine. I would rate it a seven out of ten.

The scalability of ServiceNow is good. I would rate scalability an eight out of ten. My company is a startup organization, so I have few customers. Two or three customers are using the solution.

The initial setup is straightforward, and it took around a week to deploy the solution. Initially, we need two or three members for deployment. Once we hand over the solution to the customer, it depends on how they manage it.

We need a manager, developer, and QA personnel to deploy the solution.

Licensing is chargeable. For example, earlier, it was monthly.

ServiceNow is a very good product, but it's widely used in the industry. Overall, I'll give it an eight out of ten.

I would advise customers that this is a very useful setup. We get a lot of real incidents, apart from false incidents. Also, ServiceNow has its pro application setup related to AI ops. So, as per the customer, if we need to figure out any issue, we can initially use the standard ServiceNow application. After that, if we separate ServiceNow using AI ops, we can get many features. It is machine learning and AI-based. After that, we can get a lot of features.

In normal ServiceNow, we have to search for routers and other things, but we can get these things automatically from the system in AI operations. So, there is a set of things we can advise the customer in such a way.

My company implements the solution both on-premises and in the cloud for clients. 

The solution is used to discover assets, their dependencies , service mapping and implement all required ITSM modules including CMDB and Asset Management on a single platform.

The solution allows you to subscribe to the all required ITSM modules , asset discovery and service mapping on a single platform, its guided setup provides easy implementation process and I found these features most valuable.

The out-of-the-box reporting feature has room for the improvement, it can be make more user friendly as other tools. 

Troubleshooting can be confusing if you are not well versed in scripting.

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable and new versions are released twice per year. 

I found the solution scalable, it is now highly recognized in the industry and there are many compatible products available. 

For example, CyberArk and SCCM provides out-of-the-box integration with the solution. 

For one client, we wanted to clean the CMDB excluding few records so we contacted technical support. Rather than assist us with the task, they provided written steps for completing the task without losing data. We would have preferred a higher level of assistance. 

For some errors I face, I have not found proper resolution in the available documents or through the community. 

Neutral

Few of our clients previously used BMC Remedy and BMC Discovery but moved to ServiceNow for it's one plateform solution feature.

The initial setup is easy once you get used to it. 

Initially, I found the solution's setup to be a bit more complicated than BMC Remedy and BMC Discovery. 

As I learned more of the solution's features, I became confident with installation and deployment. ServiceNow is a cloud based solution and you need to install a MidServer application to interact it with clients environment and data centers in cloud and on-premise. You can install more than one MidServers for an environment to cover all the assets and DMZ's as per the requirement. It's guided setup for step by step installation instructions gives an easy approach to implement it.

I implement the solution for clients. 

The solution offers yearly licenses and a subscription model for add-on features. 

I recommend any solution only after proper assessment of clients environment and requirements and if you are looking for implementing asset discovery, service mapping, CMDB and most of ITSM module on a single place then ServiceNow is good to choose for. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

The auto remediation feature has been most valuable. They have also introduced an AOP feature of ServiceNow that we are keen to explore. They have also come up with a lot of anomaly detection and self healing through orchestration.

Even though they call it low code there are a lot of customizations needed, especially from an ITOM standpoint. We have the opportunity to pick elementary data but there is a lot of scope when it comes to training bots and the ML capability. I think this solution still needs to mature, especially from an ITOM perspective. It is still very difficult to train the bots to to detect anomalies.

The ML capability also needs improvement. 

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. I would rate it seven out of ten for stability. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The availability of the contact center for high priority tickets is really good. If you are an ITOM user and you depend on a particular vendor to get a response, especially when it comes to new product features, there is a lag. 

Positive

For us, the initial setup was straightforward but this does depend on your organization. If you don't have a proper CMDB set up, whether it is internal or outside ServiceNow, the ITOM implementation may not be very easy. 

This solution offers good value but comes at a very high premium. Pricing could be reduced by 10 to 20%.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.