Slack Reviews

We use the solution for internal communication within the company. We also use Slack for one-to-one messages and audio and video meetings.

The most valuable features of Slack are basic chatting, file sharing, and screen sharing. I've also used the solution for automation.

Slack's screen sharing might also add the remote control feature, which is not there. You cannot control somebody else's screen if they're sharing it. You can only view it. That is one feature that could help.

I have been using Slack for eight to nine years.

The solution's stability is good enough. Sometimes, it hangs a little, but you can force reload it to make it work.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten.

Around 800 users use the solution in our organization on a daily basis. I've used the solution with 20 to 30 people, and it has worked fine.

The solution's initial setup is easy.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup an eight to nine out of ten.

The solution improves productivity and makes it very easy to coordinate with your teammates. Slack makes it easy to work in groups and easily search for information.

Slack has improved the way our organization functions. It spares you the trouble of emailing back and forth. You can just hop on a channel and interact with all the interested parties rather than waiting for emails to come and then responding to them. The solution really improves the organization's productivity.

I was running a monitoring setup. Whenever there was a high-priority alert, I linked it through Slack's webhooks feature so that I would receive a message on a certain Slack channel that something was down. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use the solution to manage communication within our organization.

The solution could be more stable compared to Microsoft Teams. Also, we encounter errors with Slackbot while granting authority. It needs to be more straightforward in providing documents.

I rate the solution's stability a six and a half. It could be better.

We have 200-300 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

I rate the solution's initial setup process a nine out of ten.

I rate the solution's pricing as five out of ten. It is less expensive than Microsoft Teams.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Our clients use Slack because it is highly customizable, allowing us to create applications and plugins to easily connect with various applications and receive updates.

Slack offers the ability to make customizable applications and plugins. It facilitates the connection of various applications to receive and send updates. It's for popular applications like the calendar and others and it is also adaptable for cloud applications, making customization straightforward.

In Slack, there are areas for accessibility improvements. For example, Canvas has options for reading documents in particular channels, however, these could be more accessible. There are some accessibility glitches where status is not accurate, unlike Microsoft Teams, which provide accurate status updates.

I've been using Slack from July or September to November, which accounts for one and a half years now.

The stability is rated six to seven out of ten. It can benefit from updates, as it's sometimes not easy to restart.

The scalability is rated as high, with a score of eight out of ten.

Customer service and support can be rated as an eight out of ten, with good support and the ability to report issues.

Positive

The initial setup is rated nine out of ten, indicating it is easy.

We are like an implementer that acts as a partner. 

I would recommend Slack to other people, and I would rate the overall solution as an eight out of ten.

I work alongside other departments, and we use Slack mainly as a source of communication.

Slack is a very collaborative tool that makes it easier for me to communicate with the onboarding and billing teams.

Slack tends to crash once a month. We have to keep an eye on the dashboard status because there is always an issue with attachments or sending images once a month. The application crashes out of the blue. There are issues in general with the application, especially the desktop application.

I have been using Slack for about a year.

Slack’s stability works fine for us.

Slack is a scalable solution. About 500 to 600 people are using Slack in our organization.

I contacted Slack's customer support because I once faced an issue sending invitations. It was an issue on their end that was easily fixed because they were super helpful.

Positive

Slack's initial setup is super easy.

Slack is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

Since it's very easy to collaborate with the tool, I would recommend Slack to other users.

Even though Slack is a very useful tool with many incredible features, the fact that it tends to crash once a month makes it a little bit difficult to work with.

Overall, I rate Slack a seven out of ten.

My organization uses it for collaboration and updates. We use it for meetings. Slack can be integrated with Confluence, Google Meet, and Zoom. We use it for important events. We constantly check Slack for updates from our bosses, CTO, and CEO.

The solution provides spell-check features while messaging. People cannot join groups without the admin’s permission. Slack’s security is really, really good. Even if something happens to our mobile phones, we can still retrieve our messages in Slack. I like that we can integrate the solution with various tools. The product gives the best user experience. The interface is wonderful.

The product could improve its notifications. The notifications on the phone are delayed. The notifications on the laptop come on time, though. There’s a latency issue in the application.

I have been using the solution for four years. I am using the latest version of the solution.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. I had an issue when I was using Slack on a Linux distribution. Not all Slack integrations are reliable. The version of Slack on Windows is far more stable than Linux. I did not contact the support team for it, though. I just deleted the application and reinstalled it.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is very easy. The product is deployed on the cloud. The deployment takes a couple of minutes. It has very low latency.

I advise everybody to use the solution. It is one of the best tools that a company can use. It is specifically designed for collaboration within the workplace. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

The reason we are considering other products is because of integration. It doesn't integrate with CRM or ERP. We worked with Microsoft Exchange and we worked with CyberArk. We have what we need, so we don't require Slack anymore. But I think it's a good product.

The reason is we are moving towards a new CRM, so we have a suitable solution to integrate with the new CRM. We have more specific needs now. Slack lacks in certain integration. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

Slack is a very stable product. However, with the free version, we only have limited message history access in the free version. But overall, it's a good product and a good solution.

There are around ten end-users in my company using this solution. There is only one administrator for the solution.

The initial setup was very easy.

Slack is a good product in its free version, but currently, we are integrating it with VM-sharing solutions like Dolibarr. We are also exploring other products similar to Slack. So, in about a month, we will be moving towards these new products and won't be using Slack anymore. 

However, until now, for the past two years, it has been a good product.

In the new CRM RFP, we plan to use Nextcloud. We also use SysTrack, but it's free. That's how our organization works. We have our own server, etcetera.

So, the only problem is we could not integrate it with our new solutions.

I would definitely recommend Slack for small companies. For medium and large companies, I'm not sure. Maybe there are integrations available in the premium version of Slack. Otherwise, it is a very good product. 

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten . 

We are using Slack for web conferencing. It is primarily for external communication with one of our suppliers.

The most valuable feature is the screen sharing, which works well.

This solution is freely available to almost everyone.

The tracking, integration tool, and voice calls are all good.

The user interface is intuitive for me.

There should be better integration between Slack and Office 365.

It should be easier to work collaboratively on files.

I would like the text in chat to be more customizable.

I have been using Slack for a couple of months.

We have not experienced any problems with stability. We use it maybe once a week to contact one of our suppliers.

As a user, I have not had problems with scalability. I am part of a small group that makes use of slack but that doesn't mean that it isn't widely used in the company.

I have not been in contact with technical support.

We are using multiple web conferencing tools including Mircosoft Teams, Skype, and Slack.

I would say that the user interface in Slack is more intuitive than in Teams. One advantage to teams is that it is fully integrated into Office 365. I would say that collaborative working on files is better in teams. In our situation, the focus of Teams is internal, rather than with external partners.

Overall, this is a good product and I can recommend it. It's easy to use and so far, it has been reliable.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I use the product to chat and huddle with company members.

It doesn't offer much in terms of improving the organization. It's just used for chatting, being in touch with others, and setting up meetings.

The huddle feature is valuable to me. We can easily make a video call.

The product should provide integration with other solutions like Gmail or Outlook.

I have been using the solution for more than two years.

The solution’s stability is good. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the solution’s scalability a ten out of ten. All 150 people in my organization use the product.

I use Microsoft Teams and Google Chat as well. I'm more comfortable with Google Chat because the interface of my Gmail and Google Chat is on the same page. I do not need to open two different software.

The initial setup was very easy. It took five to ten minutes.

The product is not difficult to use. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.