Originally purchased as a replacement for CA7/11, now used for full-blown enterprise automation. We utilize agents on Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries machines.
Works at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Originally purchased as a replacement for CA7/11, now used for full-blown enterprise automation
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Made the job of automating tasks easier, especially tasks that cross application boundaries. Since we have applications that cross multiple platforms, this simplified where tasks get automated from several locations down to a single controller.
What is most valuable?
Workflows in general. It's great to automate across multiple servers through multiple applications. It is also useful to be able to use the universal templates to create our own automation types. We have found this useful for several different applications, as well as our own internal FTP task type.
What needs improvement?
The FTP tasks. Ever since UAC changed to using cURL for FTP, we have had a lot of issues. 90% or more of our FTP tasks have been moved away from the UAC task type to our own FTP task using WS-FTP pro (which has more flexibility, that UAC does not offer such as PGP encryption)
Buyer's Guide
Stonebranch
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Stonebranch. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In some of the earlier releases (5 and prior). Nothing in newer releases.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support was superb! I can't say nearly enough great things about Lisa and the whole gang!
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
CA7/CA11 - switched due to cost.
How was the initial setup?
I was not there for the initial set up of the single environment. That being said, I implemented a tiered environment and it was very easy to set up.
What about the implementation team?
StoneBranch assisted setup.
What was our ROI?
Unknown to me.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of this product, compared to competitors is great. There is a general ease of set up for agents on all systems (except the mainframe which can be a little trickier).
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not there at the time of the switch.
What other advice do I have?
UAC is a wonderful product, and as an end user, I would fully suggest looking into this product.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Works at a financial services firm
Helped us automate manual tasks.
What is our primary use case?
FileTransfers and batch automation in Java environments. Implement daily checks on database tables with SQL tasks.
How has it helped my organization?
UAC helped us to automate manual tasks and reduce the time for people to do manual tasks.
What is most valuable?
Create Java between tasks and show this in a graphical overview. Integrate easily different application with UNIX tasks.
What needs improvement?
Have a better graphical workflow overview, more information on icons, the UI uses. We would like to have information in dependencies in virtual recourses.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's good.
How are customer service and technical support?
Awesome and fast.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Our own implementation.
How was the initial setup?
Easy, upgrade was a bit complex.
What about the implementation team?
In-house.
What was our ROI?
Cheap and reliable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Stonebranch Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Product Categories
Workload AutomationPopular Comparisons
Control-M
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
AutoSys Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
Automic Automation
Redwood RunMyJobs
Tidal by Redwood
ActiveBatch by Redwood
VisualCron
Rocket Zena
OpCon
ESP Workload Automation Intelligence
HCL Workload Automation
AppWorx Workload Automation
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Stonebranch Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How do I license the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
- How would you compare Stonebranch Universal Automation Center vs Control-M?
- Which is Best: Scheduler Control M, CA or Tidal?
- When evaluating Workload Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What should businesses start to automate first when starting off with an enterprise scheduling tool?
- What is the best workload automation tool in the market?
- How does Control-M rank in the Workload Automation market compared with other products?
- Should project automation software be integrated with cloud-based tools?
- Why is Workload Automation important for companies?