Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sucuri Logo

Top 10 Sucuri Alternatives

Vendor: Sucuri Security
4.2 out of 5
739 followers
Start review

Top Sucuri Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sucuri based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Sucuri Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sucuri Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Sucuri Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare offers cost-effective scalability and robust performance tools, making it ideal for optimizing content delivery and managing DDoS attacks. In comparison, Sucuri's focus on security features, such as malware detection, appeals to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive protection and expert deployment support.
Download Cloudflare vs. Sucuri Report
Cloudflare offers a setup cost advantage with simpler implementation, whereas Sucuri's setup requires a higher initial investment, highlighting the upfront cost difference in choosing between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare offers a setup cost advantage with simpler implementation, whereas Sucuri's setup requires a higher initial investment, highlighting the upfront cost difference in choosing between the two.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Sucuri is favored for its cost-effective website protection and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cortex Cloud offers advanced features like comprehensive security orchestration, making it appealing for tech buyers seeking integrated solutions despite a more complex deployment and higher upfront costs.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri's setup cost is lower and straightforward, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial price.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri's setup cost is lower and straightforward, while Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial price.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.6 out of 5
Sucuri stands out for its affordable cost, ease of deployment, and strong customer service, appealing to smaller businesses focused on web security. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's extensive features justify its complexity and higher price, catering to enterprises needing advanced traffic management and integration.
Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a competitive setup cost, making it ideal for budget-conscious users, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced features. This distinction is crucial for organizations prioritizing cost efficiency or feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a competitive setup cost, making it ideal for budget-conscious users, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced features. This distinction is crucial for organizations prioritizing cost efficiency or feature set.
Sucuri Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Sucuri offers robust security features and straightforward deployment, attracting smaller businesses with competitive pricing. In comparison, Azure Front Door excels in scalability and integration, appealing to larger enterprises with complex needs, offering advanced features and justifying higher costs for long-term benefits.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a transparent setup cost, while Azure Front Door may include variable fees based on customization and usage. This highlights the difference in pricing models between Sucuri's fixed rates and Azure's scalable options.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a transparent setup cost, while Azure Front Door may include variable fees based on customization and usage. This highlights the difference in pricing models between Sucuri's fixed rates and Azure's scalable options.
Sucuri Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Sucuri excels in affordability and ease of use with malware detection and DDoS protection, making it ideal for budget-conscious teams. In comparison, AWS WAF offers seamless AWS integration and real-time analysis, appealing to enterprises needing robust scalability and advanced features.
Download AWS WAF vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers straightforward setup at a lower cost, while AWS WAF involves higher setup expenses related to its extensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers straightforward setup at a lower cost, while AWS WAF involves higher setup expenses related to its extensive configuration options.
Sucuri Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri offers budget-friendly security with easy deployment and strong support suited for small to medium businesses. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF appeals to enterprises needing sophisticated security features like enhanced encryption and flexibility, making it a strategic investment for organizations prioritizing high-level protection and ROI.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a more cost-effective setup alternative than F5 Advanced WAF, which demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant price difference between these web protection solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a more cost-effective setup alternative than F5 Advanced WAF, which demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant price difference between these web protection solutions.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Sucuri attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, effective support, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers advanced security features and CDN integration, appealing to those with higher budgets and technical proficiency seeking comprehensive web protection solutions.
Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more flexible but complex pricing model. Sucuri's simplicity contrasts with Cloudflare's varied options, highlighting a clear distinction in their approach to pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers a more flexible but complex pricing model. Sucuri's simplicity contrasts with Cloudflare's varied options, highlighting a clear distinction in their approach to pricing.
Sucuri Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Imperva DDoS excels in real-time threat intelligence and integration for complex IT architectures, making it ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Sucuri offers comprehensive website firewall and effective multi-layered protection, appealing to businesses prioritizing all-around security with user-friendly deployment.
Download Imperva DDoS vs. Sucuri Report
Imperva DDoS has a higher setup cost than Sucuri, highlighting a significant price difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva DDoS has a higher setup cost than Sucuri, highlighting a significant price difference in initial investment.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
Sucuri is valued for affordability, malware scanning, and support suited for small businesses. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector emphasizes advanced threat detection, scalability, and a global CDN, appealing to larger enterprises needing sophisticated security despite higher costs.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers an affordable setup cost with straightforward implementation, whereas Akamai App and API Protector involves a higher initial investment, which could reflect its advanced features and robust protection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers an affordable setup cost with straightforward implementation, whereas Akamai App and API Protector involves a higher initial investment, which could reflect its advanced features and robust protection capabilities.
Sucuri Logo
Fastly
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Fastly
4.3 out of 5
Sucuri focuses on website security solutions like malware scanning and firewalls, making it a cost-effective option for seamless integration and strong support. In comparison, Fastly offers advanced edge cloud services for real-time content delivery, prioritizing superior performance and extensive customization options.
Download Fastly vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a zero setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice initially, while Fastly requires a setup fee, which may impact upfront expenses. The significant cost difference is a critical factor for users considering initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a zero setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice initially, while Fastly requires a setup fee, which may impact upfront expenses. The significant cost difference is a critical factor for users considering initial investment.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Atomic ModSecurity Rules
1 out of 5
Atomic ModSecurity Rules provides essential security for web applications, ensuring robust protection and flexibility. Its real-time updates and extensive customization options are valuable features. However, users note that documentation could be improved and initial setup can require significant expertise.
View comparison
Sucuri Logo
Comodo cWatch
4.8 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Comodo cWatch
4.8 out of 5
Sucuri excels in malware protection, offering powerful scanning and DDoS defenses. In comparison, Comodo cWatch focuses on enhanced threat detection and advanced monitoring. Sucuri's easier deployment appeals to less technical users, while Comodo cWatch's detailed setup benefits tailored security needs.
Download Comodo cWatch vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a straightforward setup cost, while Comodo cWatch presents a more variable pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in cost approach between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a straightforward setup cost, while Comodo cWatch presents a more variable pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in cost approach between the two security solutions.
Sucuri Logo
SiteLock
3.3 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
SiteLock
3.3 out of 5
Sucuri offers robust malware scanning and DDoS protection, making it ideal for specific security concerns. In comparison, SiteLock provides a comprehensive security suite with automated vulnerability management, appealing to enterprise users needing detailed security architecture and strategic deployment guidance.
Download SiteLock vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost, while SiteLock offers a varied pricing structure, highlighting differences in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost, while SiteLock offers a varied pricing structure, highlighting differences in their pricing strategies.
Sucuri Logo
Sucuri Logo
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service
3.6 out of 5
Sucuri is known for its simplicity, affordability, and focus on performance, making it ideal for smaller enterprises. In comparison, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service offers advanced features and robust protection, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive security and enhanced threat management.
Download Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri has a low setup cost, making it an economically appealing choice, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service involves higher initial expenses, which can impact budget allocation for some businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri has a low setup cost, making it an economically appealing choice, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service involves higher initial expenses, which can impact budget allocation for some businesses.
Sucuri Logo
Imunify360
1 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
Imunify360
1 out of 5
Imunify360 enhances security management and provides valuable features like automated patching and malware protection, effectively safeguarding web servers. Some users praise its comprehensive firewall, though there is room for improvement in reducing resource usage. It is crucial for maintaining robust server environments.
View comparison
Sucuri Logo
CDN77
5.0 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
CDN77
5.0 out of 5
Sucuri appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive website security with features like firewall and malware scanning. In comparison, CDN77 attracts users needing fast global content delivery, leveraging over 30 data centers to optimize performance. Each solution caters to different user preferences in digital security and speed.
Download CDN77 vs. Sucuri Report
Sucuri offers a setup cost advantage, while CDN77's initial fees are higher, highlighting a notable difference in pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Sucuri offers a setup cost advantage, while CDN77's initial fees are higher, highlighting a notable difference in pricing structure.
Sucuri Logo
BitNinja
1 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
BitNinja
1 out of 5

THE ULTIMATE SHIELD FOR WEB APPLICATION SECURITY. Experience the advanced filtering, easy management, regular updates and low false positive rate.

View comparison
Sucuri Logo
StackPath WAF
4.5 out of 5
Sucuri Logo
StackPath WAF
4.5 out of 5

StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.

The product is affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
The product is affordable.

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
Domain Name System (DNS) Security