F5 Advanced WAF vs Sucuri comparison

F5 and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. F5 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Sucuri Security is ranked #37. F5 holds a 7.8% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

F5 Advanced WAF

Read 72 F5 Advanced WAF reviews

7,021 Views
6,600 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

1,045 Views
648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 Advanced WAF

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Sucuri and F5 Advanced WAF are both strong competitors in web security. While Sucuri offers affordability and strong support, F5 Advanced WAF takes an edge with its advanced security features, which justify its higher price for many buyers.

Features: Sucuri offers comprehensive website protection, effective malware detection, and simplifies performance optimization. Its cloud-based system allows easy integration with minimal maintenance needed. F5 Advanced WAF provides threat intelligence, robust application security measures, and advanced mitigation techniques, catering to enterprises needing deep, specialized protection.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could enhance real-time threat detection and add features for advanced bot protection. Its customization options also need expansion for varied security requirements. Additional API security features would make its offering more comprehensive. F5 Advanced WAF might improve its deployment process to cater better to users less experienced with complex integrations. Enhancements in user interface intuitiveness and expanded out-of-the-box analytics options would aid users more effectively in understanding complex security events.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sucuri leverages its cloud-based solution for seamless deployment, coupled with excellent customer service. This streamlining allows for easy problem solving and integration. In contrast, F5 Advanced WAF requires more expertise due to its advanced functionalities but compensates with robust support to facilitate configuration and management tasks efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri positions itself as a cost-effective solution, providing a good return on investment for small to medium-sized companies not heavily investing in extensive security infrastructure. F5 Advanced WAF, despite its higher initial costs, offers significant benefits and value for larger enterprises investing in top-tier security solutions, providing a substantial return when safeguarding complex infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

37th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (26th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 7.8%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
F5 Advanced WAF	7.8%
Sucuri	1.1%
Other	91.1%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

Application security has protected critical banking services while policy learning minimizes false blocks

F5 Advanced WAF performs well overall, but I have noticed some points that could enhance the solution. Initially, policy tuning could be simpler, as while the learning engine is powerful, initial tuning still requires experienced engineers, which can be challenging for new teams due to the complexity of options and parameters. A more guided and simple tuning workflow would help reduce the learning curve. Additionally, tighter native integration with SIEM or SOAR tools would simplify correlation and investigations for security teams, although log exports are available. Overall, these are not blockers, merely enhancement opportunities, and once tuned, F5 Advanced WAF is very stable and reliable; improving usability, reporting, and onboarding would make it even more effective for larger environments.

Read full review

Jagobandhu Some

Hardware Engineer at Ministry of Defense

A cost-effective choice for website security and informative support with issues related to CDN quality

One area where they could improve is in providing real-time support options because now you need to open a support ticket and wait for their response. It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance. I have found their Content Delivery Network service to be lacking in quality, and it could certainly be enhanced to provide better performance. I would also like to see improvements in the deployment process, as it currently takes more time than desirable. Another significant concern is that their service when your website is down, turns it into a static site. This means that if customers try to visit your site during downtime, they will see old content from the static site, which is not ideal. The CDN and tracking services are areas that need improvement, as well as addressing their bandwidth limitations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb."

"F5 Advanced WAF has positively impacted my organization by stopping most web application attacks on our web servers."

"The solution is stable."

"It protects and mitigates damage in the network."

"The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features."

"I definitely recommend this solution because of the time you save on analysis."

"Overall, F5 Advanced WAF is a strong, dependable enterprise solution that works best when seen as a long-term security platform rather than a quick add-on; once properly designed, sized, and tuned, it runs quietly in the background and effectively does its job without constant attention."

"Despite a few issues, F5 Advanced WAF is performing well for me."

More F5 Advanced WAF pros

"The initial setup was very easy."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

Cons

"They could provide better pricing."

"F5 Advanced WAF sells perpetual licenses as perpetual assets during sales without informing me that support ends after a few years."

"The contextual-based component needs a lot of help to catch up with the next-gen products."

"For me, an area for improvement in F5 Advanced WAF is the reporting as it isn't so clear. The vendor needs to work on the reporting capability of the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of F5 Advanced WAF is threat intelligence to protect your web application, particularly having that capability out-of-the-box, and not needing to pay extra for it, similar to what's offered in FortiWeb, for example, any request that originates from a malicious IP will be blocked automatically by FortiWeb. F5 Advanced WAF should have the intelligence for blocking malicious IPs, or automatically blocking threats included in the license, instead of making it an add-on feature that users have to pay for apart from the standard licensing fees."

"F5 Advanced WAF could improve resource usage, it is CPU intensive. Additionally, adding automated remediation would be a benefit. For example, an easy button alerts us of the events that are occurring, and what we want to do at the time. An automated approach where somebody could be alerted very quickly. Instead of going and reconfiguring everything, an automated approach is what I'm looking at."

"My experience with the technical support from F5 is that on the technical side, we sometimes face issues with reachability and availability."

"Initially, policy tuning could be simpler, as while the learning engine is powerful, initial tuning still requires experienced engineers, which can be challenging for new teams due to the complexity of options and parameters."

"The tool needs to improve its pricing."

More F5 Advanced WAF cons

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A yearly license for F5 Advanced WAF is expensive."

"I am not sure about pricing but licenses are available on Google."

"F5 Advanced WAF's pricing is high."

"The cost is slightly above average."

"I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten"

"The way we deployed it, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"There are different licenses available to use F5 Advanced WAF, such as BT, ASM, and LPM."

"There are various plans available for Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF as a Service, including a trial version."

More F5 Advanced WAF pricing and cost advice

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?

It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

Regarding the price, I think the cost is a bit higher compared to others. Earlier we were using Radware, and compared to Radware, it is very high. However, it is providing more features than Radwar...

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

In terms of additional features I would like to see from them in the future, I think the GTM is a bit complicated to configure, which I observed. Otherwise, LTM and WAF are straightforward. I faced...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 28% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Radware Alteon vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 5% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 30% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 18% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 10% of the time

Comodo cWatch vs Sucuri

Compared 9% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Sucuri

Compared 8% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF

January 2026

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

January 2026

Download Sucuri product report

Overview

F5 Advanced WAF is a web application security solution for financial and government sectors, e-commerce, and public-facing websites. It offers protection against various attacks, including botnets, web scraping, and foreign entities. The solution can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud and is often used with other security tools. Its most valuable features include DDoS and DNS attack protection, SSL uploading, anomaly detection, and the ability to input custom rules.

F5 Advanced WAF has helped organizations to expose more services to the public while providing an extra layer of protection, preventing revenue loss, and securing connectivity.

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri

December 2025

Free Report: F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.