Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Sweet Security?

Featured Sweet Security reviews

Sweet Security mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Sweet Security in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) category stands at 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sweet Security1.3%
Wiz17.4%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks12.4%
Other68.9%
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

PeerResearch reports based on Sweet Security reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)Mar 25, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonSweet Security vs WizMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonSweet Security vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto NetworksMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonSweet Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecurityMar 25, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.3N/A97%138 interviewsAdd to research
Wiz4.417.4%97%38 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Wellness & Fitness Company
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Non Profit
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
University
2%
Media Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Retailer
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Sports Company
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Government
1%

Compare Sweet Security with alternative products

Learn more about Sweet Security

Related questions

 
Sweet Security Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Infrastructure & Dev Ops Lead at Babylon Labs4.0I use Sweet Security for real-time infrastructure security and vulnerability management; it found useful vulnerabilities and offers strong Layer 7 inspection plus low-overhead eBPF sensors. Pricing and support are strong, but the UI is confusing, integrations are missing, and scalability seems limited.
Director of Security Operations at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees5.0We've used Sweet Security for two years in AWS for runtime protection, and it’s scalable, stable, and highly effective. Its code-to-cloud visibility, threat detection, and support are excellent, though integration and IaC capabilities could improve.
Cloud and compute team leader at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We've used Sweet Security for a year to manage cloud vulnerabilities on AWS, valuing its real-time monitoring, SOC integration, and responsive support, though alert timing could improve; overall, it's effective for our small IT team.
Works at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.5Sweet Security provides real-time visibility and efficient alerts, saving us significant investigation time. Its UI, insights, scalability, and support are excellent, though some customization could improve. Overall, it's reliable, effective, and greatly enhances our security operations.