No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
it_user221835 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of IT with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Apr 12, 2015
POV discovered a number of previously undetected threats enabling system administrators to take action and make the system even more secure.
Pros and Cons
  • "The POC quickly revealed areas for improvement and potential threats that the traditional defenses had utterly missed."

    At the core of the bank’s ability to meet our mandate is a substantial IT infrastructure that not only needs to run optimally, but must be protected. We have long embraced best practices when it came to cybersecurity, but recognized that advanced threats evolve over time and need to be well handled. 

    We selected FireEye for a POV conducted over a period of three months. The POV soon discovered a number of previously undetected threats enabling system administrators to take action and make the system even more secure. As a result of the findings, we implemented FireEye to strengthen our IT infrastructure. The POV was up and running in less than a day and used actual traffic analysis to investigate what was occurring in our IT environment. 

    This solution consists of FireEye Network Threat Prevention platform and FireEye Email Threat Prevention platform in operation alongside FireEye Central Management to coordinate intelligence gathering from the Web and email appliances in addition to the intelligence gathered by the FireEye Threat Intelligence. The POC quickly revealed areas for improvement and potential threats that the traditional defenses had utterly missed. 

    The FireEye team remained in close contact with our key personnel throughout the process. FireEye proved very supportive both of the technical and business aspects of the POV and ultimately our implementation of their technology both in terms of cost and underscoring the difference between traditional defenses and the next-generation defense system. We are continually strengthening our IT infrastructure together with reinforcing policy and process on IT Security to achieve the highest productivity and lowest risks.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user221829 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Expert Penetration Tester at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Vendor
    Apr 12, 2015
    Compatibility with legacy components alleviates the need for additional investments in hardware, software, and training.
    Pros and Cons
    • "After all of our testing was conducted we felt confident that this was the right approach to safeguard the bank from advanced malware, zero-day and targeted attacks."

      Our infrastructure contains an extensive amount of hardware, applications, networks, and online banking systems; each with their own characteristics and potential vulnerabilities. With an environment of this complexity it is imperative to deploy best-in-class security measures. However, with the escalating sophistication of multi-domain attacks it became very evident that traditional security technologies were becoming increasingly inadequate and easily bypassed.

      We spoke with a number of security product providers and industry experts, and we began seeing a pattern of recommendations emerging from many sources for the FireEye suite of solutions. We contacted the company and collaborated to identify exactly what we needed to deploy to supplement our existing defenses.

      We implemented the FireEye Network Threat Prevention Platform to guard against zero-day Web exploits and multi-protocol callbacks. The most critical success factor for us was the threat detection performance of the solution: After all of our testing was conducted we felt confident that this was the right approach to safeguard the bank from advanced malware, zero-day and targeted attacks. We especially liked the protection against blended attacks that had already evaded multiple layers of legacy security controls. 

      Another key benefit was the FireEye platform’s ease of integration with our existing security information event management system. Compatibility with legacy components, such as the SIEM system, alleviates the need for additional investments in hardware, software, and training.

      In addition to penetration testing, part of my role involves the analysis of malware that specifically targets Internet banking customers. The appliance’s use of the FireEye Multi-Vector Execution engine and the ability to archive suspected malware for later scrutiny have both been major pluses for this aspect of my job. We are continually investigating new security solutions; the FireEye technology has always been extremely compelling to us, and it has been very validating to see the company back this up with its continuously evolving expertise and innovation. The ever-expanding threatscape makes it a constant challenge to keep our environment protected, but FireEye continues to deliver.

      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Trellix Network Detection and Response
      July 2026
      Learn what your peers think about Trellix Network Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
      908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
      Security Engineer at Mavisco Resources Sdn Bhd
      Reseller
      Top 5Leaderboard
      Sep 22, 2023
      An easy-to-deploy solution that is scalable, stable, and easy to configure
      Pros and Cons
      • "The product is very easy to configure."
      • "It is not a very secure product."

      What is our primary use case?

      We use the product because our customers want to fix a web gateway and NDR so that they can watch the incoming traffic.

      What is most valuable?

      The product is very easy to configure. Most of it is automated. We don’t have to configure it manually. It does not have any issues so far.

      What needs improvement?

      It is not a very secure product. It doesn’t provide 100% protection. The security must be improved. The tool must provide more integrations with different platforms.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using the solution for about a year.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      I have no issue with the solution’s stability.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      I have no issue with the tool’s scalability.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment took 30 minutes.

      What about the implementation team?

      To deploy the product, we just need to know the customer network and put it as a gateway or bridge. We just need an IP.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      The tool is a bit pricey.

      What other advice do I have?

      I was involved in the proof of concept. If someone requires the tool for their environment, they can use it. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free Trellix Network Detection and Response Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
      Updated: July 2026
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free Trellix Network Detection and Response Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.