UiPath Test Cloud Reviews

We use the product for RPA and application testing. 

UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications. 

UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement. 

I have been working with the solution for two to three years. 

UiPath is stable. 

The tool's scalability is not an issue due to its low-code features. 

UiPath's support is good. They have a quick turnaround time. 

We used Selenium and UFT before. We chose UiPath to consolidate everything on a single platform and move away from older technology. We have also been using it for RPA. 

We were confused with Orchestrator's installation. The solution needs to have better documentation or information around it. 

The tool's deployment was done in-house. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. We are still young in our testing journey with UiPath. We may see more ROI when we add more test cases. 

UiPath is very expensive. 

We evaluated the market leaders. 

We are moving away from legacy technology. We consolidate everything into a single platform. I also like the tool's low-code benefits. 

UiPath has improved our collaboration and communication with developers. It has improved the turnaround time for test scripts and test sets. 

The solution has helped us reduce maintenance by leveraging libraries. 

The product has freed up our staff's time. The turnaround time for script development is faster now. 

We use UiPath to test various technologies like web and Java applications. 

There are fewer breaks in tester scripts and faster development time. The tool has reduced total testing costs. 

I rate the product a six out of ten. 

We use the solution to automate tests. We have different teams implementing different applications. My responsibility is to use it on end-to-end tests.

There are a lot of benefits of automation. We probably have reduced the number of incidents in production, but that's very difficult to estimate. We are finding bugs and defects much faster. We have very fast feedback when we do automated tests. We also have much better documentation of our applications. We may have documentation written down somewhere, but it is hard to maintain. When we have automated tests running, our application is actively working.

The most important thing in the solution is the robotic part. It’s fundamental. It should be able to go across, and that is what robust robotics does. It is the core functionality of UiPath. There's a lot of things we can do. We can integrate it into our CI/CD pipeline. We also can schedule runs in Orchestrator.

We monitor the runs on Orchestrator. Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand. We almost need to have certification to use it.

I have been using the solution for three and a half years.

The product is stable.

Primarily, around 30 developers use the product in our organization. It is scalable.

I am satisfied with the technical support. There are various channels we can use. My developers are using those. I haven't heard them complain about it.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward because we had already deployed the robotics part. We had several instances of tests, but we already ran robotics, so we had infrastructure in place. The deployment was quick. We ordered the service and downloaded the software. That was the easy part. Usually, we would see a lot of issues, but we have an expert to solve those issues when we need to install things. The solution is deployed centrally. Anybody who wants access to it can have it.

We have patches and upgrades, as always. It’s not a challenge, but we need to do that sometimes. It is usually done during the night. The tool does require maintenance. Whenever the changes are done in the applications, we need to change our test cases.

When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced. The price was almost the same as the big competitors. I have heard that the price has increased. However, it was fairly priced when we bought it.

We implemented the solution because we didn't have a common test automation tool. We needed a common test automation tool that could go across a lot of applications. We can have various tools that may be used for UI, DB, or API, but we needed something that could go across a lot of applications.

We use various UIs, Citrix, SAP, API calls, and database queries. The ability of Test Suite to automate tests from a wide range of technologies is very high. We haven't found anything we cannot do. We didn't do automation in the range we do now.

We haven't integrated much. The tool can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines. There are some plugins available, at least for Jenkins, but we have tried to integrate with others without issues. We have also integrated with some pipelines in Jira. We haven't found issues when we tried to integrate with other tools. However, we haven't done that much.

We find defects faster now. It's a very important part of automated tests. The faster we can find defects and bugs, the less cost or time it takes to resolve them. If a bug is introduced in any environment and we find it out after two weeks, it is quite difficult to find out what we did two weeks ago. If we get the response immediately after we have deployed something into an environment, we can understand it quickly. That's a very important part of automated tests.

We are now running thousands of test cases every day. If we want to do that manually, we'll never get the money from management to do that range of testing. However, it's almost free when we get it automated. We cannot compare the two. We're not saving costs directly on testing. We are saving costs on faster feedback and faster delivery of new features.

A big part of UiPath is robotics. If it is not available, we can develop it ourselves. We used RPA for many years. There are some differences. We need to have Test Suite to test things. It was not a big change for the organization and the resources needed. We cannot calculate ROI. We see benefits when we have fast feedback and probably fewer incidents in production.

We didn't see time to value immediately. We saw time to value with Test Suite within half a year or one year. There are discussions about UiPath. They say that anybody can use UiPath. My recommendation would be to use well-educated developers. They must have some education or certification on UiPath. However, they are expensive.

Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

We use Test Suite for many types of testing, including origination, smoke, and web application testing. We are slowly migrating all of our test cases, but so far, we have primarily used it for our smoke and regression test cases. We mostly automate Windows .NET technologies. UiPath also works with web application frameworks like React, Angler, and Java. 

UiPath Test Suite helps us automate our testing. Other tools like Selenium require you to learn the language, or you need a specialist to write the scripts. With UiPath, we can automate manual testing using team members who are not that technical. It's easy to learn and requires no coding skills. So we were easily able to achieve our objectives.

Web applications are always easy to automate. The challenge is implementing or automating a Windows application, but we can do that successfully. UiPath Test Suite has freed staff to work on other projects. It's hard to quantify, but the initial time savings was high because it runs 24/7. One manual tester works 40 hours weekly, and we had four testers, so that's 160 hours. We can now complete the same work with around four hours of manual work. 

It's easy to integrate UiPath with other tools like Azure DevOps for running those bars and generating the test history. It also comes with out-of-the-box Jira integration. Hundreds of tools are available, and it integrates with most of the popular ones. Some tools, like Micro Focus Octane, don't have native integration, but UiPath has connectors for those.

UiPath has also reduced the time spent on maintenance. Otherwise, when we make changes, we need to test all the steps manually. We're progressing toward becoming fully automated, but it has cut maintenance time in half so far. 

Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package. 

Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work. 

I have used UiPath Test Suite for more than five years.

I rate UiPath support a 10 out of 10. They've been fantastic and are always there to help customers. 

Positive

We saw benefits from using UiPath Test Suite almost immediately. We did a proof of concept for about two weeks and put it into production

UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen. 

I rate UiPath Test Suite a nine out of ten. We started with Test Suite, but now that we have UiPath in place, we can also automate our processes. That's UiPath's advantage. It isn't simply a testing solution. We have the option to scale up our test cases or automate other processes. It's one of the benefits of using an RPA tool for testing. 

UiPath has a few minor areas that need improvement like mobile testing, but they are constantly adding features like AI-driven functionality. I'm optimistic about the platform's potential. 

UiPath Test Suite serves two main purposes. First, it enables unit testing of automation solutions, allowing you to test the functionalities of your developed processes, which helps in faster deployment. Second, it supports regression testing of applications. If there are changes in the applications, UiPath Test Suite can be used to verify these changes and ensure that everything functions as expected.

It enhances the speed of deploying changes and maintaining live process automation. It accelerates the testing cycle, allowing for faster and more efficient testing. Additionally, it facilitates regression testing by reducing the dependency on human testers. Test bots can operate around the clock, including weekends, which helps to streamline production release cycles.

The Test Manager is a user interface tool that simplifies the use of the Test Suite. It allows users to test cases, view results, and access reports, providing an intuitive way to manage and analyze testing activities.

They have helped us automate desktop applications and browser-based applications using Test Suite.

It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent.

The integration is easy, and we have used it to test various applications. We have tested various applications using the Test Suite, which works seamlessly and has helped us reduce maintenance.

It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite.

I have been using UiPath Test Suite for three years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

400 users are using this solution. If we scale the Test Suite, it becomes expensive.

I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.

Support is always quick to respond and help us through our problems. They give us end-to-end support whenever we are stuck in a problem.

Positive

The initial setup is simple and takes a couple of days. For deployment, we were a team of four people.

Maintenance is required if the UI screens change. The test code changes depending on how frequently the application changes. If the application we are testing modifies, we need to change the code.

They have released autopilot for test developers, drastically reducing development time.

I highly recommend UiPath Test Suite to other users. It is already being used extensively by various organizations to test their applications and reduce the deployment cycle of automation solutions.

It is easy to use, develop, and deploy, and it enhances the remarkable benefits of the UiPath Test suite. It reduces the deployment cycle, helps maintain various solutions, and reduces the regression testing cycle of any application.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I work with the solution in order to automate tasks in our company. It works alongside our Jira product. We can coordinate with Python to automate tasks and use AI.

It's useful for automating tasks. We can automate alongside our UI. Manual testing takes too much time. For the business, it makes things much easier. 

The integration with solutions such as Jenkins. The ability of Test Suite to automate tests from a wide range of technologies is very good. We can automate anything. 

It's helped us free up staff time for other projects. The more we automate, the more time we can spend on fixing bugs.

Test Suite is great for integrating with other lifecycle tools and applications in our environment. We can integrate tests in our continuous pipeline - with Jenkins, for example. We can plug right into our pipelines and GitLab.

We've been able to reduce maintenance by integrating with maintenance solutions.

We have been able to save the time needed for testing.

The computation is very good. 

We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks. 

We'd like to see it work closer with AI. It would help enhance UiPath.

I've used the solution for two months. 

I do not have experience working with support. 

I have used other solutions, including Rubrik, in the past. UiPath allowed us to use it for testing and automating tasks. If a team member isn't good with programming, they can still use UiPath.

The initial setup was not complex. It was simple to deploy. We did a continuous integration strategy. We were able to deploy it quickly and easily.

There is some maintenance required after deployment. 

I've been able to find a way to work with UiPath without having to pay fees. 

It's a great tool, and AI can continue to enhance it. 

For those worried that their automation testing is too complex, I'd advise them that it would not be with UiPath. You should just understand the testing process in Jira and the RPA process. The tool will ensure simplicity. As long as you know the fundamentals of the test, UiPath can automate. It's not hard. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We use the solution for supply chain management use cases. We can do test automation on the UiPath process automation tool. We used it for logistics orders and distribution projects. We have different applications there. We automated 12 applications.

We've used the solution for SAP applications as well as Anaplan and Salesforce.

It helps with invoice processing and form filling. You can make a lot of manifest cases. A lot of customers were spending a lot of time clearing cases.UiPath can come in and automate a lot of the manual tasks. 

The document understanding is good.

It's helped free up staff time for other projects. For example, in billing scenarios on SAP. I implemented an automation. I designed it in just eight hours. In another vendor, it took 32 hours to design something. It was faster using UiPath. Our demo was very successful. We could lower the time for billing to four minutes, and eight seconds. The best part is that it can maintain data in one place which makes it faster than other tools.

We have been able to reduce maintenance. It was not so easy to maintain, and lately, it's gotten much easier with the object repository feature. Customers can maintain code very easily at this point. You don't need to touch the actual base code with UiPath. You can, for example, three different objects with one code. The base code remains the same even as the objects change. 

It's helped reduce the cost of testing. We don't need to, for example, maintain a separate database for UiPath solutions. You can maintain your raw test data and have everything, once again, in one place. You don't have to buy separate licenses. We don't need SQL and we don't have to go with Jira every time. We can make everything under one umbrella. With other automation tools, you often have to buy more than one license to have end-to-end capabilities. 

The product releases sometimes have issues. In the past, I have provided points, such as exporting to the external file and getting reporting in an Excel file. That cannot be done yet. 

I don't recommend UiPath for third-party tools. I don't see the value in that. There are, for example, still a lot of issues when integrating with Jira. There were just too many scenarios to integrate.

I've used the solution for about seven years.

The solution is absolutely stable. It's very stable and easy compared to other automation tools. It's very successful compared to other options. 

The solution can scale. There are a lot of other things to update. It can be quite difficult with Excel, SharePoint, and SQL. It can be difficult to connect with these compared to other automation tools. 

They provide very good support. They support the technology very well. 

Positive

I've also used Microsoft Power Platform. UiPath was much more stable. I've also worked with Automation Anywhere.

We have witnessed an ROI. Everything is in the cloud. It saves on power, execution, and maintenance. 

You don't need many developers to design your automation, and everything happens very fast. The development time is lower. You can get up and running quickly. It's easy to migrate your automation code if you need to. It's easy to do testing across different web apps as well. You only have a license cost, which may be high, yet the ROI is quickly visible.

For those that worry their testing is too complex for UiPath, I'd advise them that UiPath can actually do pretty much anything. It offers end-to-end capabilities where users have everything in one place. They can maintain data and code. The reporting is there. For complex testing, having everything in one place is very, very important. Having direct integration and reducing coding is key to simplifying everything. UiPath helps reduce time in creating testing and frameworks. It makes everything very easy. Data and summary reports are all right there. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I've worked on a variety of automation solutions and uiPath has been the best in my experience. While there still needs improvements in terms of streamlining external connectors, it works quite well.

We use UiPath Test Suite to perform testing for a client's product. It helps automate internal technologies, which I am not supposed to disclose.

The solution has automated processes, thereby eliminating the need for manual testing, which has led to cost savings. Although the exact percentage saved is unclear, it has indeed saved time.

UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform. Additionally, it offers all necessary functionalities.

More precise logging would be appreciated. Additionally, addressing some bugs could improve functionality, and pricing could be more competitive.

We have been using UiPath Test Suite for approximately 15 months.

UiPath Test Suite is not always stable. There are some downtimes, so I would rate its stability at seven point five out of ten.

The solution is very scalable and addresses our business needs.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The solution was immediately effective upon deployment.

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

If there is a budget constraint, I would not recommend UiPath Test Suite, but if not, then I would definitely recommend it.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.