OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and UiPath Test Cloud both compete in the test automation category. UiPath appears to have an upper hand due to its focus on ease of use and integration capabilities, which can lead to cost savings and efficiency improvements.
Features: OpenText excels in handling complex algorithms, essential for industries like meta-mathematics and quantum mathematics. Its integration with ALM and Jenkins is seamless, benefiting users transitioning from UFT. UiPath Test Cloud focuses on user-friendliness, with robust integration features that help reduce testing and maintenance costs.
Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to enhance integration with open-source frameworks, improve browser support, and address stability and performance issues. UiPath could improve in areas like manual test case management, cloud storage for test scripts, and handling large data sets, alongside enhancing automation features for workflows.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText primarily supports on-premises deployment, with mixed user satisfaction ratings regarding support response times. UiPath offers more deployment options, including cloud environments, but also receives mixed feedback on support, with users desiring more control over product direction.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is expensive but delivers significant ROI by reducing manual testing efforts. UiPath, although also high-priced, offers flexibility and a wide range of features, providing solid value for money, albeit potentially restrictive for smaller companies.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.
UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
