SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the automation testing category. SmartBear TestComplete appears to have the upper hand, with superior features like dynamic find methods and efficient data-driven testing, making it highly valued by its users.
Features: SmartBear TestComplete offers robust test automation with dynamic object recognition, FindChild and FindAll methods, and extensive scripting capabilities across various languages. Its Object Browser and integration with third-party DLLs add flexibility for complex projects. On the other hand, OpenText Functional Testing provides seamless integration with developer tools and AI-driven features, enhancing Jira integration and support for multiple programming languages.
Room for Improvement: SmartBear TestComplete could improve mobile testing support and streamline its licensing process for virtual machine compatibility. It also needs refinement in dynamic object capturing and handling modal dialogs. OpenText Functional Testing requires better stability, improved integration with ALM, and a more competitive pricing model.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexibility in deployment, available on-premises or in the cloud. Users commend SmartBear TestComplete for responsive customer service with active forums and user communities. Conversely, OpenText has faced criticism for slower support responses and unresolved issues.
Pricing and ROI: SmartBear TestComplete is perceived as reasonably priced, especially given its advanced features and flexible licensing options. Users experience strong ROI through time savings in test execution. OpenText's solution is considered expensive, with high licensing fees, potentially hindering ROI for smaller companies.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SmartBear TestComplete | 6.0% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Other | 91.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.
SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.
What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
