VNX [EOL] Reviews

• Scalability
• High performance
• Easy administration

We need, in real time, to be able copy in more than two data centers, and EMC gave us a better solution with great performance.

We get good performance from all our applications like Oracle DB, SAP, Sybase DB, Exchange, and SharePoint which are running on the backend of my storage device.

We've used it for one year, alongside RPA, VMAX, and VPLEX, all by EMC.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

Customer Service:

9/10 - we get immediate support from EMC.

Technical Support:

9/10 - we get immediate support from EMC.

There was no previous solution in place.

It's a complex setup as we have three different data centers, which are far from each other.

The implementation was done by a team from EMC who were 9/10.

EMC products are costly when compared to other vendors such HP, Hitachi, Dell, and NetApp.

No other options were evaluated.

If you have a banking and finance domain, then go for EMC products as they offer better performance and scalability.

They have more different/flexible models in the midrange storage area In comparison with other vendors . They have also built in VMware specific features . Lastly, it has reasonable performance/cost.

In a virtualized infrastructure based on VMware Hypervisor, the VNX series SANs provide some useful vendor specific features for us.

• Storage processor architect for real active/active HA
• ASIC based functions are needed

I've used it for about four years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

In comparison to other products, VNX scales out well.

Customer Service:

It's satisfactory. This company really care for their customers.

Technical Support:

So far, we have had a response to all our queries from tech support.

No previous solution was in place.

The deployment procedures are very simple, and based on a step-by-step installation guide.

We implemented our device ourselves .

We have preloaded/license free vendor specific feature for VMware infrastructure with EMC VNX Series SAN Systems. It would be a good choice for midrange businesses due to the performance/features and cost. The licensing terms and conditions are a flowing Pay-As-You-Grow method and it's a good option for long term planning.

We only compared different VNX models.

Pay attention to the initialization procedure. Also, the reinitialization procedures are very complex after the initial VNX product .

• Fast VP
• Fast cache
• Snap clone
• Snap shot
• RecoverPoint
• SAN copy
• Mirror copy
• Access Logix

I have worked on CLARiiON and all series of VNX.

I implemented and performed the migration myself.

EMC pricing is too expensive, like the Apple brand iPhone in the cellphone market.

• Raid pools
• Snapshots

• With raid pools, you aren't limited with RAID size.
• Snapshots will ease your testing on the applications.

• Caching
• Auto-tiering

I've been using block OE 5.32 and file level 7 and the VNX 2 series, block OE 5.33 and file level 8 for six years.

Not really.

If it's configured properly after sizing, then no.

No, it's easy to upgrade and expand.

Customer Service:

It's great.

Technical Support:

It's great.

HP EVA and once NetApp, but they both had slow performance and a lack of features so we switched.

The first time was easy, as it was a simple design.

We did it in-house.

It's around 250% over 12 months due to the amount of data that we have.

Start with the basic licensing and add upon need. In our market, we need keep the cost of 1TB at less than $1000.

NetApp is better with CIFS and file shares.

The cost of the product, because it's considered an entry level product for what it does, but it had everything we needed for a great price.

All our storage is now in two places, a primary site and a DR site. Network shares, VM storage, etc. all come from the same physical infrastructure at both locations. Instead of getting more servers for storage, we were able to over-provision this and have had plenty of storage for the past two years. We recently just added another DAE to both locations pretty easily which extends the storage even more.

It only supports 10Gb copper, and cannot do 10Gb fiber. The system health screen could be more useful and show more important information. No support for flash drives.

I've used it for two years.

Stability has been rock solid, as we have been running both units for over two years with no major problems. There are redundant power supplies for everything. We have lost a DAE because of a double power failure and the unit still was fully functional, once the DAE came back online it meshed back into the array seamlessly.

Customer Service:

EMC customer service has always been spot on. Any issues we have are dealt with right away.

Technical Support:

EMC has great online support and tech support over the phone. Their knowledge base is pretty easy to use and updates are easy to find.

Deployment was quite straight forward, we did not need any assistance from EMC. Any small questions we had could easily be found online or via YouTube.

It was very straightforward as long as you have a basic knowledge of networks and network storage. The instructions provide a great starting point and you can continue online for more and better information.

It was done in-house, with just a single deployment person with a second person helping with ISCSI and other configuration options.

We have not done any calculations, but the costs we have saved in power consumption, data center space, and cooling cannot be ignored. We went from three full racks of servers, to a half rack (not all EMC, the rest is a Cisco UCS deployment). The savings alone on the three factors above over the past two years have probably paid for this investment already.

Pricing is very good, especially for educational institutions. Licensing is pretty straight forward really, it's just a support contract that is needed to keep everything up to date but there are no extra license fees or anything once you get the unit.

We evalulated HP, Dell, and NetApp storage products in the same class

Use Google and YouTube when implementing, there are lots of tips and advice out there, along with best practices. There's lots of stuff not on EMC's site but other helpful sites as well. There is a pretty large community now for this product line.

A new ST VP is significant change introduced with VNX which makes data access considerably fast. Performance is noticeably great as compared to other Celera and Clarion models. SSD are used for caching due to which data reading /writing is quite fast. Database operations are quite fast over this storage with cache and FC channeled connection. It has extremely large and flexible storage size as per the need.

Due to very complex structure and sophisticated architecture, it needs experts for trivial troubleshooting also. It’s bulky and expensive.

We moved from CX with FC/SATA to VNX with SSD, SAS, NL-SAS. Using SSD as Fast Cache (and for VDI boot images) we have seen huge performance gains in certain operations. Our exchange admin reported that db defrag operations that ran for hours per db were now able to complete for all dbs in under 2 hours. We like the Fast Cache and see over 50% of the IOs from the VNX being provided by those two disks.