I am using Atlassian ALM as the only product. I am not working with solutions from OpenText or IBM. I do not use those plugins. I am working with the cloud deployment model. I have an overall experience in this field of more than 25 years as a Program Test Manager and an Independent Program Test Manager. I work in numerous companies and was at Reckitt six years ago. I am satisfied with future updates and features for the product. My overall review rating for this product is eight.
I would put even nine out of ten for Atlassian ALM. Most of the things that people are annoyed about is that others have not even gone into that. They publish their development roadmap, and then people debate what shall be developed next and so on. There is much discussion, but the other vendors do not even publish their roadmaps, so you cannot have any discussion. I give this review an overall rating of six out of ten.
My first recommendation would be to think about what you want to use the data modeling for? Do you want to have organization per project, per customer, per product, per business? This is my recommendation, think about how to make the modeling work with what you want to do. The scheduling feature is too complex. They should make the project management part of the course plan activity easier. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Product Delivery Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 10
Feb 12, 2020
Atlassian is a market leader in this segment and I would definitely recommend this solution. I would just like to see more of the features available at a more reasonable cost, which would keep more people from going to the community version. This is a good solution, but the main thing we want to see is better traceability between epics, features and stories. As it is now, there are only two levels. The link is between an epic and a story or an epic and a feature. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
How to use Atlassian to manage application lifecycle: Atlassian builds software to pull together all the elements of application lifecycle management. Product management, developers, Q/A, dev ops, and business stake holders all have their own ways of interacting with application lifecycle management and Atlassian splits up the process into a few buckets.
1) Collaborate to plan and envision work
Atlassian's Confluence is a collaboration platform for building and driving consensus. Call stake...
I am using Atlassian ALM as the only product. I am not working with solutions from OpenText or IBM. I do not use those plugins. I am working with the cloud deployment model. I have an overall experience in this field of more than 25 years as a Program Test Manager and an Independent Program Test Manager. I work in numerous companies and was at Reckitt six years ago. I am satisfied with future updates and features for the product. My overall review rating for this product is eight.
I would put even nine out of ten for Atlassian ALM. Most of the things that people are annoyed about is that others have not even gone into that. They publish their development roadmap, and then people debate what shall be developed next and so on. There is much discussion, but the other vendors do not even publish their roadmaps, so you cannot have any discussion. I give this review an overall rating of six out of ten.
I would definitely recommend using this solution. Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.
My first recommendation would be to think about what you want to use the data modeling for? Do you want to have organization per project, per customer, per product, per business? This is my recommendation, think about how to make the modeling work with what you want to do. The scheduling feature is too complex. They should make the project management part of the course plan activity easier. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Atlassian is a market leader in this segment and I would definitely recommend this solution. I would just like to see more of the features available at a more reasonable cost, which would keep more people from going to the community version. This is a good solution, but the main thing we want to see is better traceability between epics, features and stories. As it is now, there are only two levels. The link is between an epic and a story or an epic and a feature. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.