What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

The features that are valuable about OneLogin are the ones I mentioned. I have noticed specific outcomes since using OneLogin, such as reduced incidents of password hacking and threats from various hackers.User identity synchronization across directories is a good feature that I use, and it helps me identify which user has been given access to what. The user experience of OneLogin is very good, as it provides a seamless experience, although sometimes there are lags. Overall, it is a seamless experience. HR-driven identity management plays a very important role, as whenever HR assigns a new employee a user ID, I use OneLogin for that, making it very useful and safer for us. I have saved time with this software. OneLogin is good, value-for-money software that needs improvement on some glitches, but overall, it is a value-for-money solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin an eight because of the benefits that OneLogin provides.

My impression of OneLogin providing a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating is positive because I never had any issues or glitches. Even when we were learning how to use the software, it was straightforward and extremely simple. Programming it for clients was the same. OneLogin was one of the SSOs that I would recommend because it was the easiest to use.Deployment would take, on average, hours depending upon how many we were deploying to. However, it was typically hours at most, depending upon other software because we would just put it in our software stack, and when deploying the software out to the computers to set up, it would just be part of that package. We had a team of two hundred specialists working with OneLogin. Our clients varied in size, with many of them having employees between two hundred fifty to five hundred, and then some on the smaller side with a team of fifty. OneLogin does require some maintenance, including updates, upkeeping, and patching to ensure there are no glitches since people are constantly trying to find ways to get in or duplicate access. We did constantly monitor, patch, and update as part of our routine for our clients so they would not have to worry about it. It is easy to maintain OneLogin. We never had any issues where patches or other updates did not take or caused more issues for the client. We have not fully used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, as I think some clients were not comfortable using that feature. We are testing it and pushing for them to do it, but we have not gotten them to do it as of yet. They still prefer to rely on the tried and true method. We do not have HR-driven identity management with OneLogin. The HR team is separate, so I am not quite sure what software they use for that purpose. My advice for others looking to implement OneLogin is that I would definitely recommend it, especially if they are looking for a simplified way of integrating and creating a single sign-on. I give this solution an overall rating of ten out of ten.

I would rate OneLogin a seven out of ten because the single sign-on was good, and the Multi-factor Authentication was effective. I just wish the user interface could be more refined and more useful. I advise others looking into using OneLogin to consider it as a good product and pursue it. My overall rating for OneLogin is seven out of ten.

General impressions in the company that we are integrating OneLogin with are really positive. Before, they were using another program for MFA, and they were really dissatisfied with it, so the user experience was overall positive. OneLogin saved a lot of time because it is faster. OneLogin's customer support receives a rating of seven out of ten. My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to use it. OneLogin scales really well in smaller and bigger environments, offering different options depending on what you want to do, such as using it as an access management tool or as an authentication method. I rate OneLogin an overall score of eight.

My advice for others considering OneLogin is that it depends on the device type and number in the company. For seventy percent Mac systems, I would prefer Jamf, and for a fifty-fifty mix of Mac and Windows systems, Microsoft Entra or Okta would be better. Regarding additional thoughts on OneLogin, I would reiterate the need for improvements in support and the introduction of RBAC features in the product. I have provided a review rating of seven for OneLogin.

OneLogin is nice and easy to use. I would rate OneLogin an eight out of ten because nothing is a ten for me; everything can be improved, and this is quite acceptable. More integration with other solutions, especially Entra ID, would contribute to a higher rating. Based on my experience, the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is acceptable. Regarding OneLogin providing a smooth experience for end users when they are signing in and accessing applications, end users are not really logging in through One Identity, but One Identity provides them all the necessary groups to log into their applications, so they do not notice anything. The experience is smooth. My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to get skilled people who can work with OneLogin and who can script. My overall rating for OneLogin is eight out of ten.

For buyers looking into using OneLogin, I assure them that it is advantageous software as it improves security, enhances system security, and maintains the workflow of information. I rate this product a 9 out of 10.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that if you need better security, user interface, and a faster user experience, it is the way to go, although the support system lacks at times. They can improve their support and reduce the price. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I rate OneLogin a ten out of ten. OneLogin does not require maintenance. With a good IT team, OneLogin works smoothly and it is self-explanatory.

To those evaluating this solution, I would advise making sure that what they need out of the box is there. For example, our ERP's connector was not there, so we lost a lot of time trying to get that done. We had to go back and forth with them. OneLogin has a feature called mapping. If mappings go wrong, the application can destroy a lot of things. For example, if you have a mapping that allows you to delete users automatically, and you make any change to that, it can go and delete. It can delete users in the live environment, such as Gmail. Because it is automated, it automatically starts removing users. It happened to us because there was no test environment. We did get one, but such things caused a lot of issues. Overall, I would rate OneLogin a seven out of ten.

I'd rate OneLogin by One Identity an eight out of ten. It wasn't on my radar before I joined this organization, but I championed its implementation, and even looking back five years later, I stand by that decision. It's a major time-saver and convenience enhancer for everyone here. The workflow is intuitive and accessible and rarely requires support intervention for basic tasks, which makes us all much more efficient. OneLogin is deployed in one location. We are a K12 school with everything from young kids to high school students. It is one building with multiple divisions with 650 users. We have two people in IT with full access to OneLogin and two people with limited access to reset passwords. Maintenance is minimal. Our main responsibility is to ensure application tokens like those for Office remain authenticated. Otherwise, provisioning will halt. This is solely on us; OneLogin isn't responsible for token management. Last year's dashboard update was primarily aesthetic. While the new interface is attractive, it offers minimal functionality. It simply displays the main provisioning screen, which fulfills their basic requirement. Essentially, OneLogin's end is covered, leaving the onus of maintaining app connections squarely on us. While I recommend OneLogin, it's essential to proceed with caution. Make sure it aligns with your specific needs. Due to its extensive feature set and constant updates, OneLogin can be overwhelming, especially for users who lack a clear vision of their desired outcomes. Simpler, more limited products might be better suited for such scenarios, as they avoid information overload while offering focused functionality.

The adoption rate of the solution in our organization is good. There are no big challenges. I restrict access to just one interface. We only use one application. There’s no interaction between the product and other applications in the environment. In one year, the product has helped to free up almost a month’s time for our IT team. The solution works okay. There was no problem with the user experience when working remotely. The solution has helped our organization to save money. We use one account for managing the systems. We improve law enforcement using the application. The legal department requires some information from this application, and we provide it to them. I maintain the servers. I work in DevOps. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

My advice for anybody who is considering OneLogin is to ensure that it's the right product they're looking for. They should be utilizing single sign-on as a majority, and not looking to share passwords externally or with third parties. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We do not use OneLogin desktop feature to extend SSO and Mac OS or Windows machines. I am considering it, however, I know there are also other offerings. We utilize Kandji for Mac MDM and I'm considering trialing that. As far as Windows goes, we have Intune set up and they do SSO. There's no need for a OneLogin client on their desktop. We had that set up before the OneLogin offering, so we just kept to it as is. We have not used Smart Hooks to create custom workflows and integrations. We use various clouds for our deployment, including Microsoft and Google. I'd rate the solution overall an eight out of ten. The biggest factor for me from giving it the highest score right now is the support. The ease of use as far as deploying the users or connecting fast applications is straightforward. Sometimes you do require the help of documentation, however, when you do, the documentation is there and it is thorough. It's a lot more straightforward than something like Active Directory, however, it's not really an apples-to-apples comparison.

I was a customer and an end-user. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It's a nice SSO. Just know that if you want a more proper security suite for access, it's going to cost you more money. The basic package is just very basic two-factor authentication.

I'm not sure of the version we are using, however, I do believe it is the latest release. I use it on my personal computer for my personal use. I have a web subscription. I was recently looking for other Identity providers available that have on-premises potential. OneLogin has on-premises solutions but their enterprise options are a bit on the expensive side so we are looking for alternatives. Currently, I'm much more focused on Okta, as the solution hasn't really met our requirements. The main feature that we are looking for is the device management in which we don't need to have a plugin for anything. We want to manage everything in one place. We even want to have the PCs go password-less. Based on the fact that we want to make all of our PCs password-less, we are looking for something that can help us manage the PCs as well. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I would recommend having the professional services from OneLogin, if not fully, at least partially. OneLogin is a pretty good product. I would rate OneLogin as eight because there is still room for improvement.