For those considering implementation, if your needs align with traditional MFA or Symantec's Advanced Authentication, it's a highly recommended choice due to its stability and scalability. However, if you seek a more modern MFA solution with extensive user flexibility, such as passwordless options or pattern-based authentication, Symantec may not be the ideal fit. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.
I rate Symantec Advanced Authentication a seven out of ten. We have at least two to three customers using this solution, both of which are reasonably big-sized customers. Some customers have it for about 5,000 to 10,000 servers. To those considering implementing this solution, I would advise them to look at what their requirements are. If they want to integrate their active directory, if they want to have an integration with their exchange or application to enable multi-factor authentication, then they need to look into design because architecture is important. Sometimes you can do an architectural level integration at the firewall end, at the load balancer area, and do it in one shot for all applications, rather than going at silos and installing one application, and doing multi-factor authentication for each application. It depends on architecture, so when you are selecting a product, you have to make sure that you do the right architecture.
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Advanced Authentication. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
Symantec Advanced Authentication provides robust security solutions aimed at safeguarding digital identities through multifactor authentication, ensuring secure access control for businesses. With increasing cyber threats, businesses need reliable authentication systems. Symantec Advanced Authentication delivers enhanced security protocols, blending risk-based authentication with seamless user experiences. It supports a range of authentication methods and integrates effortlessly into...
For those considering implementation, if your needs align with traditional MFA or Symantec's Advanced Authentication, it's a highly recommended choice due to its stability and scalability. However, if you seek a more modern MFA solution with extensive user flexibility, such as passwordless options or pattern-based authentication, Symantec may not be the ideal fit. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.
I rate Symantec Advanced Authentication a seven out of ten. We have at least two to three customers using this solution, both of which are reasonably big-sized customers. Some customers have it for about 5,000 to 10,000 servers. To those considering implementing this solution, I would advise them to look at what their requirements are. If they want to integrate their active directory, if they want to have an integration with their exchange or application to enable multi-factor authentication, then they need to look into design because architecture is important. Sometimes you can do an architectural level integration at the firewall end, at the load balancer area, and do it in one shot for all applications, rather than going at silos and installing one application, and doing multi-factor authentication for each application. It depends on architecture, so when you are selecting a product, you have to make sure that you do the right architecture.