When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial pricing is good, later the cost becomes too high to use AWS services. All hyperscalers have that problem, and specifically for AWS, they are good in the market, but they need to think about how to reduce customer costs in the long run.
Senior Project Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jan 9, 2025
In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within our landing zone. It forms a part of our landing zone.
Pricing varies based on the architecture and services utilized. AWS provides tools like a pricing calculator to manage costs. Serverless architecture can reduce costs, while services like Amazon ECS, if running 24/7, can incur more expenses.
The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Jul 28, 2023
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.
Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.
When it comes to pricing for Amazon ECR, that is the only area AWS has to look into. Services like IoT services or SageMaker are very high, and many times customers complain that while the initial pricing is good, later the cost becomes too high to use AWS services. All hyperscalers have that problem, and specifically for AWS, they are good in the market, but they need to think about how to reduce customer costs in the long run.
I haven't observed the costs associated with Amazon ECR services in detail.
In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within our landing zone. It forms a part of our landing zone.
Pricing varies based on the architecture and services utilized. AWS provides tools like a pricing calculator to manage costs. Serverless architecture can reduce costs, while services like Amazon ECS, if running 24/7, can incur more expenses.
I haven't explored setup costs a lot. So far, it's not very expensive to host images on ECR.
The price of Amazon ECR is cheap.
The pricing of ECR is average compared to its competitors.
The product is expensive.
The solution's pricing depends upon the region. The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US.
The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
Amazon ECR does not have a high cost.
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
The solution's price is reasonable compared to Google and Azure.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.