There are many tools in the market that cover different aspects, such as the GitOps methodology of deployment. I have not used CodeDeploy with EKS, although I have used it with ECS. I am not sure if CodeDeploy can be used with EKS, and I see this as a deficiency for end users. Easier implementation would be beneficial.
Digital Technology Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 10
2025-02-12T09:18:00Z
Feb 12, 2025
CodeDeploy is straightforward and doesn't have any noticeable cons. I have not given thought to any particular areas for improvement because the tool works well for me.
The cost could be improved. If it were more cost-effective, it would be great. CI/CD deployment is not an open and free tool. If I use the AWS cloud, it's very costly.
People face difficulties creating pipelines in AWS CodeDeploy. AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild.
Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers.
Release Automation streamlines the deployment process of applications, offering efficiency and reducing manual errors. It facilitates faster release cycles and ensures consistency across environments.Automating the release process enhances operational productivity by orchestrating and standardizing it. It integrates with existing tools to provide a cohesive workflow from development to deployment. Its flexibility adapts to different requirements, ensuring each release is smooth and...
There are many tools in the market that cover different aspects, such as the GitOps methodology of deployment. I have not used CodeDeploy with EKS, although I have used it with ECS. I am not sure if CodeDeploy can be used with EKS, and I see this as a deficiency for end users. Easier implementation would be beneficial.
CodeDeploy is straightforward and doesn't have any noticeable cons. I have not given thought to any particular areas for improvement because the tool works well for me.
The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users.
There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment.
The cost could be improved. If it were more cost-effective, it would be great. CI/CD deployment is not an open and free tool. If I use the AWS cloud, it's very costly.
People face difficulties creating pipelines in AWS CodeDeploy. AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild.
I faced some stability issues. However, I could sort out the issues I faced.
Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers.