The disadvantages of Dell PowerSwitch N-Series is that only the booting time is a weak point. When we reboot that switch, it takes time. As compared to Cisco, it takes almost three to five minutes, or five to seven minutes, depending on the configuration and the security level we have implemented on that. But it takes a two minute difference as compared to Cisco switches.
We don't leverage the open networking standards of this Dell PowerSwitch N-Series capability. In the high availability direction, better clustering or stack functionality to connect all Dell switches together would be a desirable new feature. We would appreciate better cluster and AI-related capabilities. The main focus is on availability. The concerns are three main ones: AI capabilities, better clustering, and some stability issues experienced in the past.
Executive Business Development Manager, Cloud and Managed Services at Presidio Networked Solutions
MSP
Top 10
Apr 28, 2022
There is a lack of support because there is a lack of adoption. Because Cisco switches are so widely used, anyone in the world can support them. It was two Cisco engineers who released Arista's code. In terms of programming functionality, they essentially duplicated the Cisco iOS, so all Cisco commands work on the Arista commands. You can do an Arista if you can do a Cisco. Aruba isn't all that different. It's a little different, but they have all of HPE's money and stuff behind it and things like that. I would say the same thing about Extreme or some of the other switches where it's penny-wise, pound-foolish. You save some money if you are a small shop with only one or two guys, it's understandable. Fortinet is now in the switch business, and they have their FortiSwitch devices, which are controlled by the FortiGate firewalls to do all of the programs. There is a lot to choose from. But, in my opinion, a lot of it is dependent on the use case and the customer type. Meraki is a nice little Cisco product for the right kind of business, but I wouldn't use it in an enterprise setting.
Some features need improvements with stability. Customers do not prefer this to connect to multiple cities. We use it for a single site or single office solution. If we had to use it as a multisite or a multicity solution we prefer to go with Cisco.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers efficient and scalable networking solutions tailored for modern enterprises. Designed to enhance performance and streamline management, these switches support demanding business environments with seamless integration and advanced features.With advanced Layer 2 and Layer 3 functionality, Dell PowerSwitch N-Series meets the high-speed connectivity requirements of dynamic network systems. Its flexible security options and energy-efficient performance make it...
The disadvantages of Dell PowerSwitch N-Series is that only the booting time is a weak point. When we reboot that switch, it takes time. As compared to Cisco, it takes almost three to five minutes, or five to seven minutes, depending on the configuration and the security level we have implemented on that. But it takes a two minute difference as compared to Cisco switches.
We don't leverage the open networking standards of this Dell PowerSwitch N-Series capability. In the high availability direction, better clustering or stack functionality to connect all Dell switches together would be a desirable new feature. We would appreciate better cluster and AI-related capabilities. The main focus is on availability. The concerns are three main ones: AI capabilities, better clustering, and some stability issues experienced in the past.
There is a lack of support because there is a lack of adoption. Because Cisco switches are so widely used, anyone in the world can support them. It was two Cisco engineers who released Arista's code. In terms of programming functionality, they essentially duplicated the Cisco iOS, so all Cisco commands work on the Arista commands. You can do an Arista if you can do a Cisco. Aruba isn't all that different. It's a little different, but they have all of HPE's money and stuff behind it and things like that. I would say the same thing about Extreme or some of the other switches where it's penny-wise, pound-foolish. You save some money if you are a small shop with only one or two guys, it's understandable. Fortinet is now in the switch business, and they have their FortiSwitch devices, which are controlled by the FortiGate firewalls to do all of the programs. There is a lot to choose from. But, in my opinion, a lot of it is dependent on the use case and the customer type. Meraki is a nice little Cisco product for the right kind of business, but I wouldn't use it in an enterprise setting.
Some features need improvements with stability. Customers do not prefer this to connect to multiple cities. We use it for a single site or single office solution. If we had to use it as a multisite or a multicity solution we prefer to go with Cisco.