Regarding the outcomes, I noticed that v0 was fast, but the problem was with some SQL queries; they use MySQL queries, but I am using MySQL for my project and sometimes v0 provides a query from another database, such as PostgreSQL, so they should be consistent with MySQL. v0 can be improved because, although I mentioned package updates and consistency with MySQL, the last thing I want to comment on is that they do not provide the updated code; for example, in one project, I asked for changes, and they are not providing the updated code anymore like they did before, and currently, I see they use integrated VS Code, but I do not get the updated code there. Whenever v0 writes new code and edits a page or anything, they should have comments on that specific code so I can identify it easily.
v0 can be improved if the clarity part can be enhanced, as it can provide more clear responses based on the prompts; sometimes, there is some ambiguity with the prompts I provide.
One pain point is that if my project is at a very big level with a thousand files in a single project, and I want to develop some functionality that is interconnected with existing code, v0 does not know what my code is or how my codebase works. This interconnected flow requires me to jump to a different project. That is why I require Cursor, as they know the codebase, analyze every file, understand the flow, and can suggest improvements. Functionality-wise, Cursor is better than v0. I really want a link between Cursor plus v0. If it is possible, some kind of UI for UI or some IDE would be beneficial. Cursor provides an IDE to make changes and allows changing models. If there were something that would allow me to generate to Vercel, generate with Cursor, or work with Lovable, with all accounts linked with a single extension, it would be a really good solution.
I think v0 needs to figure out, because I'm a product manager, that one of the things they need to figure out is their main users. If they are no-code users who typically do not want to see the code, then it should bring more features to help get to the right features faster. For example, right-click to edit is one good opportunity that it has built. Similarly, it needs to make it easier to bring whatever the user's ideas are specifically to that. I cannot answer very specific features right now because another feature I can mention is for example GitHub and those kinds of tools, if the persona is no-code users, they may not even know GitHub, so they find all these things in GitHub and Superbase very intimidating. Whereas if you're looking for beginner developers or someone who has been developing, then it's fine. One of the big things that is missing in v0 is being able to take my existing code base and build on top of it. I think building something from scratch has become table stakes and AI agents are good at it, but looking at an existing code base and understanding it, improving it, that's where I think it would help to give a higher rating.
v0 streamlines front-end development with seamless integration with Next.js, GitHub, and Superbase. It enhances efficiency with right-click edits and Shadcn UI customization while supporting Tailwind CSS and Figma import for rapid UI prototyping and deployment.v0 empowers developers with tools to improve productivity through swift UI generation, automation, and stakeholder collaboration. Features such as live previews and production-ready code enable responsive design and efficient workflows....
Regarding the outcomes, I noticed that v0 was fast, but the problem was with some SQL queries; they use MySQL queries, but I am using MySQL for my project and sometimes v0 provides a query from another database, such as PostgreSQL, so they should be consistent with MySQL. v0 can be improved because, although I mentioned package updates and consistency with MySQL, the last thing I want to comment on is that they do not provide the updated code; for example, in one project, I asked for changes, and they are not providing the updated code anymore like they did before, and currently, I see they use integrated VS Code, but I do not get the updated code there. Whenever v0 writes new code and edits a page or anything, they should have comments on that specific code so I can identify it easily.
v0 can be improved if the clarity part can be enhanced, as it can provide more clear responses based on the prompts; sometimes, there is some ambiguity with the prompts I provide.
One pain point is that if my project is at a very big level with a thousand files in a single project, and I want to develop some functionality that is interconnected with existing code, v0 does not know what my code is or how my codebase works. This interconnected flow requires me to jump to a different project. That is why I require Cursor, as they know the codebase, analyze every file, understand the flow, and can suggest improvements. Functionality-wise, Cursor is better than v0. I really want a link between Cursor plus v0. If it is possible, some kind of UI for UI or some IDE would be beneficial. Cursor provides an IDE to make changes and allows changing models. If there were something that would allow me to generate to Vercel, generate with Cursor, or work with Lovable, with all accounts linked with a single extension, it would be a really good solution.
I think v0 needs to figure out, because I'm a product manager, that one of the things they need to figure out is their main users. If they are no-code users who typically do not want to see the code, then it should bring more features to help get to the right features faster. For example, right-click to edit is one good opportunity that it has built. Similarly, it needs to make it easier to bring whatever the user's ideas are specifically to that. I cannot answer very specific features right now because another feature I can mention is for example GitHub and those kinds of tools, if the persona is no-code users, they may not even know GitHub, so they find all these things in GitHub and Superbase very intimidating. Whereas if you're looking for beginner developers or someone who has been developing, then it's fine. One of the big things that is missing in v0 is being able to take my existing code base and build on top of it. I think building something from scratch has become table stakes and AI agents are good at it, but looking at an existing code base and understanding it, improving it, that's where I think it would help to give a higher rating.