Marketing Digital at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jul 16, 2026
I think Xygeni could be improved by having more information in the form of videos in Spanish and more use cases to share it with more prospects.I think improving only the documentation would be very beneficial, such as e-books also in Spanish that we can share as necessary improvements. I don't think there is any other area in which the platform could improve, but I think it's valuable to mention that it helps a lot to reduce alert fatigue from false positives, something our clients are increasingly looking for.
Xygeni can be more automated. The team is currently working on auto-remediation pipelines, which could be really helpful. There is probably room for improvement, but for me, it is one of the best tools available right now.
Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made. More customization options for dashboards and reports would help teams tailor the platform to their specific metrics and workflows. I also occasionally encounter DevOps tools that are not yet supported natively. Expanded coverage for niche or emerging tools would make onboarding even smoother. These points, however, are minor compared to the overall value the platform delivers, especially given the strength of its AI-driven detection, remediation, and supply chain protection capabilities. It would also be an improvement for licensing with regard to on-premise variants. Perhaps we could have an on-premise option for standard subscription.
Business Development Manager at a security firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 20, 2026
Xygeni could be improved if on-premise options were available starting from the starter packages, not only the enterprise models. For a perfect score, Xygeni would need to include a DAST model.
There should be more configuration options that make it easier to target the issues that are more important in your organization's context. There are different kinds of scanners, each of them targeted at detecting certain issues. As expected, scanners are agnostic and classify issues according to sensible defaults. But those default risk levels may or may not be a priority in your context. The ability to have more configurable options in this sense is desirable. The descriptions for the issues found can also be improved.
Xygeni All-In-One AppSec Platform ensures comprehensive security across the software supply chain, utilizing deep contextual intelligence to prioritize exploitable and business-critical vulnerabilities.With its AI-powered capabilities, Xygeni offers automatic detection and quarantine of malicious code at publication while providing context-aware auto-remediation. It integrates seamlessly across source code, dependencies, secrets, IaC, builds, containers, and CI/CD systems. Unified APPM...
I think Xygeni could be improved by having more information in the form of videos in Spanish and more use cases to share it with more prospects.I think improving only the documentation would be very beneficial, such as e-books also in Spanish that we can share as necessary improvements. I don't think there is any other area in which the platform could improve, but I think it's valuable to mention that it helps a lot to reduce alert fatigue from false positives, something our clients are increasingly looking for.
Xygeni can be more automated. The team is currently working on auto-remediation pipelines, which could be really helpful. There is probably room for improvement, but for me, it is one of the best tools available right now.
Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made. More customization options for dashboards and reports would help teams tailor the platform to their specific metrics and workflows. I also occasionally encounter DevOps tools that are not yet supported natively. Expanded coverage for niche or emerging tools would make onboarding even smoother. These points, however, are minor compared to the overall value the platform delivers, especially given the strength of its AI-driven detection, remediation, and supply chain protection capabilities. It would also be an improvement for licensing with regard to on-premise variants. Perhaps we could have an on-premise option for standard subscription.
Xygeni could be improved if on-premise options were available starting from the starter packages, not only the enterprise models. For a perfect score, Xygeni would need to include a DAST model.
There should be more configuration options that make it easier to target the issues that are more important in your organization's context. There are different kinds of scanners, each of them targeted at detecting certain issues. As expected, scanners are agnostic and classify issues according to sensible defaults. But those default risk levels may or may not be a priority in your context. The ability to have more configurable options in this sense is desirable. The descriptions for the issues found can also be improved.