It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.
SQL Server and SAP HANA are leading competitors in the database management system category. While SQL Server is noted for its broad usability and cost-effectiveness, SAP HANA holds the upper hand in high-performance scenarios due to its in-memory computing ability.Features: SQL Server's key features include user-friendliness, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and strong capabilities in business intelligence and data analytics. SAP HANA's standout features are its in-memory...
It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.