It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.
SQL Server and SAP HANA compete in the database management system category, with SQL Server having the upper hand in ease of use and cost-effectiveness, while SAP HANA shines in performance and advanced features.Features: SQL Server offers dynamic resource allocation, memory-optimized tables, and a range of tools for data analysis and reporting. It boasts flexibility and user-friendly interfaces that appeal to many users. SAP HANA leverages in-memory database technology for high-speed...
It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.