It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.
SQL Server and SAP HANA are competitors in the database management category. While SQL Server is known for its affordability and user-friendly interface, SAP HANA stands out with its rapid in-memory processing, particularly benefiting analytics and data-heavy operations. Features: SQL Server is favored for scalability, robust security, and ease of integration with various systems, including older SQL Server versions. It appeals to businesses due to its strong backward compatibility and...
It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.