Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CA Risk Authentication [EOL] Logo

CA Risk Authentication [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
3.5 out of 5

What is CA Risk Authentication [EOL]?

Featured CA Risk Authentication [EOL] reviews

 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 25, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

 
CA Risk Authentication [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Development Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0We use it for real-time risk analysis, blocking bad traffic and enabling frictionless authentication, which works well. However, it requires extensive scaling (5x load) and causes performance issues for legitimate users if not properly planned.
Executive Director, CTO Security - Identity Management Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I find it valuable for anomaly detection and regulatory compliance. However, static policies, false positives, and limited expert support are areas needing improvement. Its policies should learn dynamically to avoid challenging users unnecessarily.
Director OSS Application Development/Engineering - Enabling Platforms at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I value RiskMinder's behavioral analysis and automation, reducing malicious attacks by 75%. Integration took a year and can impact performance, but scalability is great. I recommend allowing ample implementation time and ensuring stakeholder alignment.