Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Reviews

Vendor: CyberArk
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Get the CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and more!
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is the #3 ranked solution in top Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions, #5 ranked solution in top Endpoint Compliance solutions, #5 ranked solution in top Anti-Malware Tools, #5 ranked solution in top Application Control solutions, and #5 ranked solution in top Ransomware Protection solutions. PeerSpot users give CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most commonly compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 66% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Featured CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

Read more reviews

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager mindshare

Product category:
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
As of August 2025, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category stands at 3.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager3.2%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager16.9%
Delinea Secret Server8.0%
Other71.9%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

PeerResearch reports based on CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPrivileged Access Management (PAM)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Delinea Secret ServerAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs One Identity SafeguardAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint4.1N/A94%198 interviewsAdd to research
SentinelOne Singularity Complete4.3N/A97%199 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is valued for its password management, DNS scanning, lifecycle management, and least privilege enforcement. Users appreciate its ability to control admin rights, manage application privileges, and enhance security against ransomware. It integrates well with existing systems, scales easily, and supports granular control over application elevation. The platform's performance and seamless integration are frequently highlighted by users, who find it effective in reducing IT support calls and improving security posture.
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has had a positive impact on my customers' security posture."
  • "There are many valuable aspects of the product, but the most common feature is working with the privileges. The controls of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager influence the visibility into endpoints for my customers. It allows them to granularly manage controls to prevent some malicious activities on the endpoint machine."
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helped us reduce the time for regulatory processes to approximately two to four months, completing the solution and training."

Room for Improvement

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager faces criticism for its complex administration, limited integration capabilities, and inconsistent user interface. Users desire improved performance, enhanced API functionalities, and more flexible policy configurations. They report difficulties with Linux support, technical support delays, and pricing concerns. There's a call for better identity governance, threat detection, and automation. Users suggest unifying CyberArk's infrastructure and expanding compatibility. They request features like XDR and customization options for policies.
  • "While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity Behavior Analytics, it would be great."
  • "While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity Behavior Analytics, it would be great."
  • "Despite newer versions and functionalities, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks sufficient knowledgeable support staff, resulting in longer wait times for assistance."

ROI

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager yields significant benefits, enhancing security and reducing vulnerability to breaches. Although quantifying ROI is challenging, the investment prevents financial losses from data breaches and decreases monitoring costs. It saves 20% to 30% of resources post-implementation and reduces manpower expenses. Entities find value through its efficiency and reliability. Confidence and reputation are safeguarded, indirectly influencing metrics like share prices. The return manifests through secured infrastructure, saving money, time, and resources.

Pricing

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is perceived as expensive, with pricing influenced by the number of privileged users, devices, and concurrent sessions. While some users note costs around $200,000 over several years, others mention a per-user expense of $17, with additional fees for professional services. Most users agree the solution delivers substantial value but is better suited for larger enterprises, particularly in finance and banking, rather than smaller businesses due to the significant investment required.
  • "I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing to pay this money."
  • "Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

Popular Use Cases

Companies primarily use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to manage enterprise passwords, monitor session connections, and control privileged accounts on endpoints. Moreover, it is employed for compliance with password policies, malware prevention, and securing admin access. It offers Just-In-Time Access, separates privileges, and blocks credential theft. Organizations use it to restrict admin rights, enforce security measures across various platforms, and manage access through shared accounts, maintaining robust security and control.

Service and Support

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager's technical support is generally reliable, with ratings from 7 to 9 out of 10. Response times can be slow and accessing support may require certification. Many users appreciate their proactive and knowledgeable assistance, though room for improvement exists in response speeds and expertise levels. Community-driven resources and courses are valuable. Some companies experience swift resolutions, while others find the process cumbersome due to escalated issues and varying engineer proficiency levels.

Deployment

Users found CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager's initial setup to range from straightforward to complex, depending on organizational size and configurations. Experienced users completed setups in hours or a day, while others required weeks due to component intricacies and server configurations. Flexibility was noted, with options for on-premises or cloud deployment. Some challenges arose with coordinating multiple teams and customizing settings. Support documentation aided in easing the process, but high-availability needs added complexity.

Scalability

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is generally seen as highly scalable, though experiences may vary. Many users appreciate its adaptability across different environments, from small businesses to large enterprises, with some noting challenges in managing extensive deployments. The cloud-based nature aids scalability, allowing easy addition of virtual resources and management flexibility. Utilities like distributed architecture and satellite vaulting enhance scalability. The overall assessment is positive with varied experiences depending on the scale and configuration complexity.

Stability

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is regarded as highly stable, with most strengths noted in reliability and performance. It operates effectively both online and offline, maintaining a minimal memory footprint. Users generally report no major issues with bugs or crashes, though occasional server restarts and some performance latency have been mentioned. Some find the administrative console could improve. Stability ratings average eight to nine out of ten.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business168
Midsize Enterprise95
Large Enterprise508
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
University
5%
Retailer
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Construction Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager was previously known as Viewfinity.

Related questions

  • 12
When evaluating Privileged Identity Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 20
How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? Could it have been prevented?
  • 64
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 27
What are the top 5 PAM solutions that can be implemented which cover both hybrid and cloud?
  • 85
What are the top 5 PAM solutions?
  • 58
How will AI and ML help or work with PIM/PAM?
  • 23
Is BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management really expensive compared to other tools or software?
  • 702
What is the difference between PAM and PAS?
  • 470
What is the difference between IDAM , PIM and PAM?
  • 209
Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A

Product Categories

Product Categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Endpoint Compliance
Anti-Malware Tools
Application Control
Ransomware Protection

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Fortinet FortiClient vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Delinea Secret Server vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
WALLIX Bastion vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
ManageEngine PAM360 vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
See all alternatives
 
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees4.5I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to control admin rights and whitelist applications, enhancing security and reducing monitoring costs. Despite some missing customization features, it offers significant ROI and advantages over previous solutions like Symantec and McAfee.
Cybersecurity Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.5I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for enhancing security in IT solutions for finance and manufacturing. It reduces IT support calls and virus infections, though it needs improved device identification and deployment scheduling. It offers good ROI and surpasses alternatives.
Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for multi-factor authentication as a Windows administrator. Its valuable features include blocking unknown applications and allowing whitelisting. Deployment issues and lack of recording capabilities need improvement. Competitors like BeyondTrust and Thycotic provide similar solutions.
Global Security Systems Consultant at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.5We use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to manage privileged access and rotate local accounts. Its scalability allows granular control over application elevation and enforces multi-factor authentication. While switching from Centrify, we found CyberArk's features superior, though simplifying administration would help.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in financial services to secure departments and protect against threats. I appreciate the easy-to-use interface and automatic updates but wish for improved privilege access management and better third-party integration in the SaaS version.
Commercial and Technical Professional Manager at Evolution Technologies Group4.5In my role at Banco Colombia, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager effectively enhances security and compliance, reducing detection time by 85% and regulatory process duration. While identity governance can improve, its integration and management benefits outweigh our previous solutions.
Security Delivery Analyst at Accenture4.0I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to manage elevation requests, track incidents, and onboard accounts. It effectively reduces malicious applications but could improve by whitelisting essential software like PowerShell. My first experience with security solutions was with CyberArk at Accenture.
Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees4.5I use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to manage user account privileges effectively, bridging the gap between admin and user control. It's user-friendly and integrates seamlessly, though expanding its scope to include EDR and analytics would enhance its capabilities.