Our company uses the solution as a financial system for core banking.
We use the Flash 7200 which is the solution's newest version and different from the V9.
IBM VersaStack offers a comprehensive architecture integrating computing, storage, and networking for seamless operational efficiency, ideal for handling demanding business environments. It optimizes IT infrastructure delivering scalability and performance.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM VersaStack | 6.2% |
| FlexPod XCS | 12.5% |
| HPE ConvergedSystem | 11.1% |
| Other | 70.2% |
IBM VersaStack, a collaboration with Cisco, provides an agile and flexible platform suited for converged infrastructure needs. Designed to streamline operations, VersaStack ensures swift deployment and integration, reducing complexity in data centers. Its robust framework supports workloads through high performance and adaptability, enhancing data management and protection with advanced Hyperconverged Infrastructure capabilities. Leveraging proven technologies, it supports businesses in optimizing resource allocation and improving operational efficiency to meet technological demands.
What are the most important features of IBM VersaStack?In finance, IBM VersaStack handles high-frequency trading by ensuring low latency and robust data processing. In healthcare, it supports electronic health records by offering secure, scalable storage solutions. Education sectors utilize it for managing vast data sets, providing reliable and efficient data operations.
Newhall Hospital, Medicat, JJ Haines, Sigmax
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure Head at a program development consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We use IBM VersaStack for core banking, appreciating its high IOPS and reliability. While deduplication and upgrade processes need improvement, it has delivered a solid ROI since 2016, and its speed surpassed competitors like HPE, Dell, and EMC. |
| Technical Head at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I found this solution excellent for virtualization, storage consolidation, and faster DR, achieving a two-year ROI. Its UCS compatibility and dedupe are valuable, but I wish raw data mapping for storage was a standard option. |
| Deputy General Manager, Data Center Solution Group, Marketing Dept. at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | I value this solution for its simple architecture, combining Cisco's FI technology with IBM's fast flash storage to converge old systems. My main concern is that awareness of this IBM solution could be better. |
Our company uses the solution as a financial system for core banking.
We use the Flash 7200 which is the solution's newest version and different from the V9.
One of the main benefits to our company is that we are very familiar with the solution. We started using it around 2013 so have many years of experience with it. We see ongoing use as having a good benefit to us.
The solution has high IOPS and the I/O is important because it gives us more transactions per second. We are not just trying to improve but we are trying to maintain the current growth of the load.
There are never any major downtimes or failures brought about by the storage.
The solution should improve deduplication to get a lot of savings.
To upgrade memory, you have to go through your license and that process is difficult.
The solution should include IBM Spectrum Virtualize.
I have been using the solution for six years.
The solution is very stable so I rate stability a ten out of ten.
Scalability used to be an issue so at that time it was rated an eight out of ten.
We have become OPEX-based and rent storage from them. Physical storage is about 200% of our requirements but we only pay for what we use. This resolved all of our scalability issues. When we reach a certain threshold like 100%, OPEX calls us and asks if we want to add more storage.
Our total capacity right now is 300 terabytes but we are only using around 200 terabytes. We bought the storage two years ago and our projections are on par. We don't need more capacity now but have plans to increase in another two years.
With our OPEX storage, scalability is rated a nine out of ten.
Technical support could improve. Their response time for site visits is slow.
We don't have major downtimes but sometimes we encounter a certain problems and need assistance with components. The response time is a bit slow when declaring that a component is already fixed or needs to be replaced. Getting replacement components is also slow.
For comparison, Cisco has a better response time.
Support is rated a seven out of ten.
Neutral
The setup is easy. We are familiar with it so there is nothing to learn anymore.
Setup is rated a nine out of ten.
We implemented the solution in-house and it took about three days.
IBM won't let any other hands on the config so that took one day. Their advanced services or SDG Lab handles deployment of storage, wiring, and software.
After that, the solution was handed over to us and we set up all the physical requirements within two days. We are adept and quite equipped at setting up machines.
Overall, it was a very straightforward install. We mounted and then IBM checked the wirings and installed the software. We set up the volumes for the storage itself and some of the configurations. That's it. It was not difficult for us.
Commonly, an install can be handled by one IBM technician and two of our in-house experts.
Our staff handles all ongoing maintenance which is very minimal even though we operate 24/7.
We have realized ROI because we started using the solution in 2016. It has pretty much paid for itself.
The ROI is rated an eight out of ten.
The solution is enterprise level so it is expensive. Our relationship with IBM makes pricing better for us. We have been end-user customers for a long time so have a good relationship with IBM.
The original licensing cost with maintenance was usually around 30% of the purchase price. Now, we just pay for what we use with OPEX storage.
Pricing is rated a two out of ten.
We evaluated and tested many options including HPE, Dell, EMC prior to it being bought by Dell, and IBM.
We ran our system, did a batch running, conducted some tests, and determined that IBM was the fastest. Speed was the key factor in our decision.
At that time, VersaStack wasn't yet named. The solution is the pairing up of Cisco Compute with IBM Storage. We were the first ones to do VersaStack in our country.
I recommend the solution. It is important to be aware of the software you need to install to maximize your benefit. For example, you should install the included monitoring software.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
The following needs improvement:
None.
No.
We were using rack mount servers, not a SAN network nor storage.
Zoning was a bit complicated for a new implementation, but it was easily adapted.
We utilized a SAN switch instead of directly connecting to the Cisco FI.
Our ROI was two years.
We evaluated HPE and Dell.
This solution converges old silo systems to the latest systems with a simple architecture.
IaaS environment.
Cisco's architecture and IBM's flash technology. Cisco provides FI technology which provides one simple architecture. IBM's flash technology is fast.
Awareness of this IBM solution could be better.