Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews

Vendor: Kaspersky
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides robust malware detection, endpoint security, integration with SIEM, control of USB devices, and behavior analysis, deployed on servers, mobile devices, and laptops.

Get the Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and more!
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is the #19 ranked solution in EDR tools. PeerSpot users give Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is most commonly compared to CrowdStrike Falcon: Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 50% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 10% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

Read more reviews

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category stands at 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response1.9%
CrowdStrike Falcon14.1%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10.3%
Other73.7%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

PeerResearch reports based on Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEndpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike FalconAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs SentinelOne Singularity CompleteAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.314.1%96%132 interviewsAdd to research
SentinelOne Singularity Complete4.35.7%97%199 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is valued for its lightweight, centralized management, high detection rate, and automated response. It offers features like geolocation, malware behavior analysis, and device protection. Users appreciate rapid policy application, customizable reports, and integration with domain controllers. It enhances security by providing full path visibility and prevents file spread. Its unified agent combines antivirus, threat response, and EDR functionalities, ensuring efficient operation without affecting computer performance.
  • "It is a secure solution with a lot of IT management features."
  • "The tool is easy to use."
  • "From my point of view, one of the best aspects of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its high detection rate, which surpasses many other solutions. Its valuable features include behavior detection, threat prevention, device control, adaptive anomaly control, and centralized protection detection."

Room for Improvement

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires better cloud compatibility, reduced resource demands, and a more user-friendly interface. It also needs improvement in network communication, support responsiveness, and patch management. Zero-day threat detection and comprehensive reporting features are lacking, and better integration with other tools would enhance usability. Users note inadequate local support compared to competitors like Trend Micro and CrowdStrike, highlighting the need for improved threat intelligence and investigation features.
  • "Kaspersky is not an XDR solution. With an XDR solution, we could gain some more time."
  • "The solution must provide better security."
  • "One of the main areas where the tool could improve is its integration capabilities. For example, I find it challenging to integrate it with other solutions. It would be helpful if the tool could make it more open to integration with other tools."

ROI

Users experienced significant cost savings and improved threat detection with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. They reported a reduction in time spent on threat analysis and response. Enhanced protection capabilities led to fewer security breaches. Users felt the investment was justified by the enhanced security and efficiency gained. Faster incident response times were highlighted, contributing to better business continuity.

Pricing

Enterprise users find Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response pricing competitive and generally within the average range. While some mention the solution as expensive, others find it cost-effective and attractive due to its advanced capabilities and customer support. Licensing involves yearly payments with occasional higher initial costs. Opinions on cost vary, with ratings ranging from five to nine out of ten. Despite some pricing concerns, users appreciate Kaspersky's effectiveness in malware detection and mitigation.
  • "The solution is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
  • "The tool's pricing was high during the last renewal."
  • "The product is cheap."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for environment scanning, virus and malware detection, SIEM integration, and tracking indicators of compromise. They focus on blocking, caching, automation, and managing endpoint behaviors. It aids in incident response, threat hunting, and safeguarding systems by controlling external device usage and providing enhanced security measures like encryption. Kaspersky's features, such as behavior and ML analysis, offer endpoint security and visibility across servers and workstations, especially in industries like finance.

Service and Support

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response customer service exhibits variable performance. Cloud support has been disappointing to some, while on-site assistance was excellent. They note long response times in standard service and quicker, effective help with premium support. Some find the technical support helpful and responsive, rating it highly, while others suggest room for improvement due to issues in ticket resolution. Local teams are praised for their proactive approach and effectiveness.

Deployment

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's setup is generally straightforward and user-friendly. Many report easy deployment, often requiring just one staff member and completing in hours to a few days. Some users experience issues on Windows 11 and with cloud versions. Challenges include domain controller access and potential CPU or storage issues. Smooth on-premises setups are common, though upgrades and network configurations may require additional attention.

Scalability

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is considered scalable by many, frequently scoring around eight or nine out of ten, except for a few critics who found it lacking. It supports diverse environments and extensive use, accommodating both large and small setups. Users plan to expand usage, indicating its capability for growth. However, some face limitations, especially in on-premises settings. Licensing permits additional sensors, enhancing its adaptability across varying needs.

Stability

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is praised for its stability, frequently rated between seven to ten out of ten. Many find it reliable and face minimal downtime, though some experience issues, particularly with certain components and connectivity. Users mention handling license updates easily with a reserve feature. It is used effectively in security departments for threat hunting and intelligence gathering, but some non-administrators may encounter stability challenges.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise53
Large Enterprise125
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Retailer
9%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
University
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
International Affairs Institute
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%

Compare Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids organizations in scanning environments, blocking sites, handling data transfers, and offering visibility into quarantine systems. Utilizing features such as encryption, machine learning analysis, caching, and automation, Kaspersky ensures enhanced security. The unified agent incorporates antivirus and EDR functionalities, centralizes management, and provides sandbox analysis alongside early-stage threat detection. Automated response capabilities improve efficiency, and the tool's lightweight nature maintains device performance despite high detection rates and advanced threat prevention mechanisms.

What are some of the key features?
  • Detailed malware information – Provides in-depth data on detected threats
  • Quick policy application – Enables fast implementation of security policies
  • Customizable reporting – Allows tailored reports to suit specific needs
  • Centralized management – Simplifies control over all endpoints
  • Sandbox analysis – Inspects suspicious files in an isolated environment
  • Early-stage threat detection – Identifies threats before they cause harm
  • Unified agent – Combines antivirus and EDR functionalities for comprehensive protection
  • Automated response – Enhances efficiency by automating threat responses
What are the benefits and ROI users should look for?
  • Enhanced security – Through advanced threat detection and prevention
  • Increased efficiency – Via automated responses to threats
  • Comprehensive protection – With the integration of antivirus and EDR features
  • Centralized control – Eases management of multiple endpoints
  • Reduced impact on device performance – Thanks to the tool's lightweight nature

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response can be implemented to protect sensitive data and critical systems against advanced threats. Financial institutions may leverage its high detection rates and behavior analysis to secure transactions and customer information. Healthcare organizations can utilize its sandbox analysis and early-stage threat detection to protect patient data. Retail businesses benefit from the enhanced security and efficient automated responses, ensuring customer data remains safe during transactions.

Related questions

  • 830
What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
  • 133
What is the difference between EDR and traditional antivirus?
  • 24
What is your recommendation for a 5-star EDR with low resource consumption for a financial services company?
  • 24
Which is the best EDR for a logistics company with 500-1000 employees?
  • 55
What is the best EDR or XDR product for a company with 9000 employees?
  • 99
What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
  • 250
Do we need to use both EDR and Antivirus (AV) solutions for better protection of IT assets?
  • 71
How does EternalBlue work?
  • 93
What are the best on-premise Endpoint Security solutions for a Tech Services company with 10,000 employees?
  • 88
Which is better for Endpoint Security: EDR or XDR solutions?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
WatchGuard EPDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard EPDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Open EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Open EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
ESET EDR/XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
ESET EDR/XDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
See all alternatives
 
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager Cyber Security Department at Mana3.0I've used Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for two years in threat hunting, finding its detection adequate but lacking features, scalability, and support compared to industry leaders like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro, making it unsuitable for long-term use.
Security Engineer at adcb4.0We prioritize Kaspersky for its effective detection and response features, particularly its sandbox environment for malware analysis. However, support needs improvement due to slow response times. We switched from CrowdStrike due to data privacy concerns and cost efficiency.
Network administrator at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees4.5I use Kaspersky on numerous servers and workstations, finding its IT management features valuable, though it lacks XDR capabilities. Our security improved significantly after transitioning from McAfee, though Cortex offers better security features.
Head Information & Communication Technology at Uganda Finance Trust Ltd.4.0I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for mobile devices and laptops, appreciating its reporting and malware detection features. However, its patch management needs improvement, prompting me to consider additional solutions like Sophos. Technical support response time could also improve.
IT Manager at Ducart4.0I find Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response easy to use with good protection that doesn't impact computer performance. However, there's room for enhancing security and performance. I previously didn't consider other solutions and have no preferred cloud provider.
Head of Information Security at Faisal Islamic Bank of Egypt4.0I primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for endpoints due to its high detection rate and valuable features like behavior detection and threat prevention. It could improve integration capabilities. Transitioning from Symantec was seamless, saving us about 70% in costs.
Senior Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees4.0We use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response to enhance malware detection. Its consolidated features, including a unified agent and cloud/on-premise functionality, simplify management. However, the user interface needs improvement. Compared to Fidelis, Kaspersky's functionality and threat response are superior.
Head of Network & Security Department at ssf4.5I used Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response effectively for my needs. However, it lacks sufficient configuration options, and I would like to see more flexibility in future versions. I didn't utilize or consider other solutions or cloud providers.