Top 10 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Alternatives

Name: Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
Brand: Kaspersky
Rating: 3.9 (19 reviews)

Vendor: Kaspersky

3.9 out of 5

19 reviews
82% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response surpasses its competitors by offering superior threat intelligence, seamless integration with existing systems, advanced heuristic analysis, and automated threat hunting capabilities that enhance security infrastructure efficiency and resilience against sophisticated cyber threats.

Kaspersky Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaspersky, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its advanced threat analysis and cloud-native architecture, ensuring rapid threat response. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR excels in endpoint protection but can be resource-intensive. CrowdStrike’s deployment flexibility appeals to tech buyers, while Kaspersky’s pricing is attractive for on-premises needs.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost differences in implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost differences in implementation.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates seamlessly with Windows OS and offers effective customer service, making it ideal for Microsoft-based environments. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response excels in advanced threat detection and response capabilities, providing substantial ROI for those needing detailed threat insights.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is known for a higher setup cost due to its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is known for a higher setup cost due to its advanced features.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in deployment and customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is favored for its comprehensive features. SentinelOne’s automation and threat hunting are standout features, while Kaspersky offers detailed threat intelligence and extensive coverage, making them suitable for different tech buyer priorities.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

The setup cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is perceived as higher than average, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is noted for its affordability and ease of setup. SentinelOne is more feature-rich, but Kaspersky offers a simpler and cheaper initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM QRadar offers broad network capabilities with scalability and integration, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive analysis. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR provides strong endpoint protection, appealing to organizations focused on device security with effective threat detection.

Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, emphasizing QRadar's comprehensive feature set, while Kaspersky offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on essential endpoint protection features.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides endpoint protection by detecting and blocking malware. It integrates with firewalls, enhances security with AI-driven threat detection, and offers behavior-based analysis. Praised for its user-friendly interface, it ensures endpoint safety but faces challenges like integration issues, high memory usage, and compatibility differences.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report

Pricing

I feel it is fairly priced.

The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.

View comparison

Pricing

I feel it is fairly priced.

The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR offers robust integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for organizations utilizing Microsoft products. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response excels in specialized security features and advanced threat detection, catering to businesses seeking detailed security layers.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender XDR has a setup cost often highlighted for its affordability, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's setup cost is noted for being comparatively higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Huntress Managed EDR

4.7 out of 5

Huntress Managed EDR

4.7 out of 5

Huntress Managed EDR offers user-friendly integration with Microsoft Defender, emphasizing 24/7 SOC and threat-hunting expertise. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR provides advanced detection features and anti-target attack configurations, focusing on comprehensive centralization and robust reporting capabilities for in-depth security analysis.

Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report

Pricing

Huntress Managed EDR has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response involves a more intricate setup that may incur higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Huntress Managed EDR has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response involves a more intricate setup that may incur higher initial expenses.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive features like threat emulation and Zero Phishing, appealing to organizations seeking strong integration capabilities. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides cost-effective threat prevention, catering to those prioritizing intricate detection over broader integration options.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has minimal setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has minimal setup costs compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

4.1 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for affordability and ease of deployment with real-time scanning. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, though pricier, offers advanced threat intelligence and automated responses. Trend Vision One prioritizes simplicity, while Kaspersky focuses on comprehensive, customizable security.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower initial expense.

WatchGuard EPDR

4.2 out of 5

WatchGuard EPDR

4.2 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced threat hunting, automated response, and robust integration. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR combines endpoint protection, detection, and response with zero-trust app execution. Kaspersky focuses on scalability, while WatchGuard EPDR emphasizes enhanced reporting and intuitive alert management.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires significant setup time while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a more streamlined and quicker initial configuration. Kaspersky offers comprehensive installation support, whereas WatchGuard emphasizes its user-friendly deployment process.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 8 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)