Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo

Microsoft UAG [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5

What is Microsoft UAG [EOL]?

Featured Microsoft UAG [EOL] reviews

 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 25, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

 
Microsoft UAG [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Consultant at Unify Square4.0No summary available
Senior System Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5We found UAG slow and unscalable, but RAS greatly improved remote access performance and stability. Setup requires network expertise, but it's a valuable upgrade for enabling global employee connectivity.
Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employeesNo summary available
Senior Manager of Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0We chose UAG for its strong security, including 2FA, enabling secure remote access for email and applications. Its administration console simplified deployment and management, despite minor difficulties with trunk configuration and network card requirements.
Manager of Operations at a tech company with 51-200 employees3.0Overall, I believe UAG provides robust SSL VPN security, including an app-layer firewall and SQL injection prevention. My concerns are its authentication issues, non-standard server communication, and strict x64 platform requirement. It's best for standard Windows/AD setups.
Director of IT at a tech company with 51-200 employees4.0I observe UAG delivers secure, policy-driven remote access, improving productivity and consolidating infrastructure. I noted issues with cross-site SSO and Network Connector. It simplifies deployment, reduces costs, and ensures granular control.
Manager of Data Center at a insurance company with 51-200 employees5.0We found UAG offers secure, seamless remote access for diverse clients, addressing our VPN challenges. Though it requires configuration expertise and multiple servers, it proved a valuable, cost-effective solution for us.