Red Hat Gluster Storage features high availability, simplified storage upgrades, and implementation ease. Offering flexibility and scalability, it's simple to manage via command line and uses minimal resources, providing a cost-effective storage solution for managing large data sets.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Gluster Storage | 2.9% |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage | 10.9% |
| DataCore SANsymphony | 6.5% |
| Other | 79.7% |
Red Hat Gluster Storage delivers reliable and scalable storage tailored for high-demand environments. Known for flexibility, it can handle tasks from log file storage to data center applications. While it offers a stable and scalable platform, users suggest improvements in interface simplification and performance enhancement. Integrating commercial storage pool management could enhance its open-source version.
What are the key features of Red Hat Gluster Storage?Banks and financial institutions leverage Red Hat Gluster Storage for robust data storage solutions configured with replication and NFS. Applicable in scenarios like log storage or virtualization, it supports file system scaling from 3TB to 12TB, addressing the demands of data-intensive tasks while facing challenges in performance consistency across different use cases.
Red Hat Gluster Storage was previously known as Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server.
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior IT Consultant at Xerif | 5.0 | I use Gluster FS for virtualization, collaboration, and data center environments, appreciating its flexibility and command-line simplicity. While it competes well against Ceph and ZFS, I wish the open-source version included Red Hat's commercial storage management feature. |
| Open Source Architect at Insentra | 4.0 | I use Red Hat Gluster Storage in banks and financial institutions due to its simplicity and low resource requirements. Its high availability through replicated configurations is valuable. However, performance could be improved. No other solutions have been previously considered. |
| System Administrator at Family-bank | 3.5 | I use this product for storage, finding storage upgrades easy and the setup straightforward. However, the UI needs simplification as it requires training. It's stable, scalable, and has good support, earning a 7/10 from me. |
| Linux System Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find this solution provides good high availability and value for data, with solid stability. However, its performance is inconsistent, and it requires more intuitive, easier management with centralized options. |
