Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Stonebranch Logo

Stonebranch Reviews

Vendor: Stonebranch
4.4 out of 5

What is Stonebranch?

Featured Stonebranch reviews

Stonebranch mindshare

As of February 2026, the mindshare of Stonebranch in the Workload Automation category stands at 4.6%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Stonebranch4.6%
Control-M14.4%
AutoSys Workload Automation8.0%
Other73.0%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Stonebranch reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationFeb 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 28, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs Control-MFeb 28, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs Automic AutomationFeb 28, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs JAMSFeb 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.414.4%98%188 interviewsAdd to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4.05.0%92%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business170
Midsize Enterprise70
Large Enterprise475
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
4%
University
4%
Government
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Stonebranch with alternative products

Learn more about Stonebranch

Stonebranch customers

Related questions

 
Stonebranch Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Lead Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I've found Stonebranch effective for job scheduling, especially its versioning, reporting, and cost efficiency. Though its scheduling setup is less intuitive than Control-M, it's stable, scalable, and supporting a successful migration across multiple regions.
Software Development Engineer at Expedia Group4.5I’ve used Stonebranch for three years to centralize automation, scheduling, and monitoring, integrating with Jenkins, ServiceNow, and AWS via REST APIs. The UI and visibility are strong, scalability and reliability are high, but onboarding documentation needs improvement.
Technology Analyst at Infosys4.0I use Stonebranch for SFTP/FTP transfers to mainframe, AS/400, SharePoint, drives, and S3. Its security and automation reduce errors, and support helps, but stability issues, high RAM, and updates can block transfers; I’ve seen no ROI and rate it 8/10.
Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees5.0I've used Stonebranch for over five years mainly for job scheduling; it's stable, scalable, affordable, and simplifies workflow monitoring and troubleshooting, though enhanced search filters and AI features would further improve the experience.
Senior Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5We use Stonebranch as a workload automation solution for SAP jobs, replacing AutoSys. Its GUI and task monitor are valuable, though improvement is needed. We've achieved positive ROI, saving 40-50% compared to previous solutions.
Senior Manager at Colgate3.5No summary available
Associate Software Engineer at Mphasis4.0In my company, we use Stonebranch for automation on a private cloud with easy rerun and dependency features. While it's cheaper than Control-M, it lacks cloud availability, affecting scalability. Control-M remains more stable and secure.
Senior Manager at Colgate4.0No summary available