No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
reviewer2812995 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Apr 2, 2026
Building tailored digital journeys has become faster and improves our team delivery quality
Pros and Cons
  • "One of the platform's key strengths is its ability to unify content management, personalization, and customer data into a single experience layer, enabling my team to build highly tailored digital journeys across multiple channels for enterprise websites like the one I work for, as well as e-commerce integrations and customer portals."

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been using Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) for approximately one and a half to two years.

    I typically use Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) for tools such as Acquia Cloud, Site Studio, and website hosting, as well as for development practices including CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.

    Most of my use with Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is with Site Studio, where I use it to build prototypes and web pages. My full website revolves around Site Studio. I also use the CI/CD and hosting capabilities so that I can deploy website changes, and Acquia takes care of all the CI/CD, testing, and hosting.

    Since my website is 100% built around Drupal, Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is the best place to host my website. One of the platform's key strengths is its ability to unify content management, personalization, and customer data into a single experience layer, enabling my team to build highly tailored digital journeys across multiple channels for enterprise websites like the one I work for, as well as e-commerce integrations and customer portals.

    What is most valuable?

    In my opinion, the best features Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) offers are website hosting, CI/CD pipelines, automated testing capabilities, and flexible deployment workflows because those are the tools I use most on a daily basis.

    The deployment workflows in Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) are very easy to use. We have an integration with Jenkins where we make a build to create an artifact, and then we deploy to Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) and all the pipeline runs there.

    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is very easy to use, and all of the team can perform well while using it. It is really accessible for all team members, so we have people working with front-end and Site Studio, and developers working with CI/CD pipelines.

    The ease of use and the accessible log tools of Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) make the team faster to debug things and deploy changes to the client website, so it really helps us. It is really easy to use and very useful.

    What needs improvement?

    With Site Studio, Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) could be less coupled to the module itself. It should be more modular and decoupled.

    Every tool I use from Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is very good, and I have not identified any other improvements needed beyond what I have already mentioned.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) for approximately one and a half to two years.

    Buyer's Guide
    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
    May 2026
    Learn what your peers think about Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
    893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is stable with up to 99.9% uptime, and none of the updates so far have caused any trouble to the team. It is really stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) handles growth and increasing demands well. I do not really need scalability on a daily basis, but in the times I needed it, it was really good.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support for Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is very nice. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I used to use PSH, but I decided to migrate to Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) because it is easier to use and integrates better with Drupal. It is 100% Drupal.

    I migrated from PSH to Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) without evaluating other options.

    What was our ROI?

    I do not have a specific answer regarding return on investment, but my team is agile, and I can see that working with competitors like PSH before, Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is much more accessible for the team. It helps improve delivery time and quality.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice for others looking into using Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is that it is a robust and scalable digital experience platform that stands out for its strong integration with Drupal, its cloud-native architecture, and from a developer's perspective, it provides a well-structured ecosystem that supports modern development practices, including CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, and flexible deployment workflows. One of the key strengths is its ability to unify content management, personalization, and customer data into a single experience layer, enabling my team to build highly tailored digital journeys with less time, very fast delivery, and higher quality in all deliveries. I gave Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) an overall review rating of 10 out of 10.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Apr 2, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Founder at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Mar 11, 2026
    Global content delivery has become faster and manages multi-country web services efficiently
    Pros and Cons
    • "Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) has positively impacted my organization by improving speed to market, where opening up a new country allowed us to put the content together very rapidly, reducing the time from a good three months previously down to six to eight weeks."
    • "One area where Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) can be improved is the cost structure, as it's quite an expensive solution for what it is."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is enterprise web services to support multiple countries, including UK, France, Germany, and the USA.

    A specific example of how I'm using Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) for these enterprise web services is that the goal was to migrate from a ccTLD model to a gTLD model to support multiple countries where previously there was only one website. In addition to that, it was also to embed a PIM and a DAM, which we also did.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) offers in my experience were the synergy with the PIM and the DAM that appealed. The integration there was the main thing for me. Again, from my point of view, I was more about strategy as opposed to implementation.

    The integration between the PIM and DAM worked for my organization by creating an ecosystem where you plug the data into the PIM and it's syndicated across Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP). It was almost having one entry populate the various repositories that makes a global approach simple.

    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) has positively impacted my organization by improving speed to market. Opening up a new country allowed us to put the content together very rapidly.

    The speed to market improved significantly in that it would have taken a good three months to get going previously. With Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP), I would say that was reduced down to six to eight weeks.

    What needs improvement?

    One area where Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) can be improved is the cost structure, as it's quite an expensive solution for what it is.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    In my experience, Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is stable.

    How are customer service and support?

    Overall, customer support with Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) was positive; we received rapid responses to queries and account management support as well.

    I would rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten as a nine.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP), I previously used a very simple WordPress solution, and I needed something more dynamic and enterprise-based.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was pretty seamless. It was all clear, it was very transparent, and we signed up to a three-year deal.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP), we did evaluate other options, including Optimizely.

    What other advice do I have?

    Regarding my main use case with Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP), the only issue around migration was a technical error which was admitted, and that was the SSL certificates weren't managed effectively, so some of the sites weren't live and they couldn't migrate with ease. They weren't a seamless transition, but it was quickly detected.

    My advice to others looking into using Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) is that if you want something that has a simple, seamless, feature-rich solution, Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) would be it. I actually delegated the decision making to my team and that was their decision.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Mar 11, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
    May 2026
    Learn what your peers think about Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
    893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Adrian Campanelli - PeerSpot reviewer
    Director at Realmedia Network
    Real User
    Top 5
    Nov 6, 2024
    Great digital DXP platform with asset management features and personalization tools but has unclear platform sizing
    Pros and Cons
    • "One of the most valuable aspects is working with a recognized firm, which sometimes surpasses the commercial and marketing requirements for big customers."
    • "One area for improvement is the way Acquia sizes their platform for customers, which can be quite ambiguous and often results in penalties after doing business."

    What is our primary use case?

    We primarily use the Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP) to develop sites and apps in the financial customer and retail sectors. We also work with big brand sites. We use the platform to build websites, mobile applications, solutions for digital asset management, and marketing campaigns.

    How has it helped my organization?

    The main advantage of using Acquia’s platform is the opportunity to work with a recognized firm, which gives us extensive commercial and marketing support. 

    However, there have been some structural issues within our organization that have led to changes and restructuring, which impacted our use of certain tools within the platform.

    What is most valuable?

    One of the most valuable aspects is working with a recognized firm, which sometimes surpasses the commercial and marketing requirements for big customers. 

    Additionally, they offer useful digital asset management features and personalization tools, although there have been compatibility issues.

    What needs improvement?

    One area for improvement is how Acquia sizes its platform for customers, which can be ambiguous and often results in penalties after doing business. 

    Issues with defining site requests and visits are not standard in the market. They also need to improve their support and technical advisory services. The manuals provided lacked clear and complete information.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using the solution since 2017.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    In three years, there was only one incident involving downtime of about forty-five minutes with a Bank, which was quickly resolved. Otherwise, the stability was quite commendable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Scalability is a challenging aspect due to some mysterious elements in the platform’s design. Minimizing issues was sometimes encouraged, which was not ideal. Scaling might mean increasing capacity or decreasing it, and this last, is the complex part. 

    How are customer service and support?

    They are usually okay, and depending on the complexity of the ticket, we can reach good experts who are far from the CX knowledge base. However, once we had customer support service in Latin America, we faced unprofessional attitudes as tech advisors. Despite participating in advisory meetings, the experience with this particular was less supportive than expected.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We had previously been developing on Drupal CMS before switching to Acquia Digital Experience Platform (DXP).

    How was the initial setup?

    Our first steps in 2017 were complex since we subscribed to an ambitious and complete DXP project with several modules for a mature customer. Now, we are very familiar with most of the platforms, and we have updated the Acquia methodology with our Agile way of work and always suggest approaching step by step your paint points while the customer adopts the expertise needed for the next step. 

    What about the implementation team?

    We have implemented Acquia first for ourselves and then as a service to several customers—more than 7 customers with more than 45 sites, directories, apps, and digital signings. 

    What was our ROI?

    On highly demanding traffic sites of large organizations with several digital channels, different brands, or assets that need to be healthy governance by efficient teams concerned with what they publish, the quality of the information, and the performance of their digital products, the ROI is over 40%/Y or hight when you quantify the easy and quick to go life with any modification. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing is considered expensive compared to other vendors, but you have to make your own TCO calculations to understand its value. The service model is based on the demand, the level of SLA needed, and the other services the customers need to build and program for any digital products. Sometimes, the Platform Sellers want to quote you everything you possibly need, and we advise you to ramp up as you need the subscription as a preferred strategy to avoid wasting costs on features that your customers are not prepared to use. 

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Yes, as part of the company process, we are always looking at the strengths and weaknesses of the market offer to advise our customers and develop skills around them. I have been involved in integrating and developing Oracle's Colud application for Digital Experience and Customer Experience, Adobe AEM and the Marketing Suits, and several others for several years. Technology is becoming a commodity per-ce in its features and capabilities, especially if it is a SAAS or PAAS solution, a trend in the last few years. So, the main difference is how they compile for the market you are in and how well their value satisfies your customers' needs. 

    What other advice do I have?

    I would recommend the product, as it fits well with specific dimensions and needs, depending on the customer and company's needs. However, it might be challenging for others with strong Microsoft, Google or similar product affiliations.

    I'd rate the solution seven out of ten, more for the company policy and unclear partnership with the integrators than for the technical aspects of the solution, which is higher than 7. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are an Acquia Strategy partner with vast experience in Spanish-speaking countries. We have developed digital products with the Acquia DXP Platform for Mexico, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, and Chile. We have also provided support to some US corporations in English.
    PeerSpot user
    Iyas Hamadet - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technical Architect / Technical Officer at SQLI
    Real User
    Top 5
    Nov 19, 2024
    Centralized website management enhanced by flexible content and seamless deployment
    Pros and Cons
    • "Content Hub provides a centralized way to manage content."
    • "In Site Factory, the provisioning of environments can take time."

    What is our primary use case?

    The usual use case is for the customer to have a centralized way to manage their websites. We manage multiple websites, sometimes with different types, plus some customers also have products they want to showcase. We manage these websites using Acquia DXP.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Acquia DXP offers the tools to make it easier to maintain, manage, and deploy websites in a centralized way for multiple channels.

    What is most valuable?

    The features of DXP that are most valuable include Acquia Site Factory, which allows for the management and creation of websites, offering a UI for managing the process of creating and deploying the websites. Additionally, Content Hub provides a centralized way to manage content.

    What needs improvement?

    There are areas where Acquia DXP could be improved. For example, in Site Factory, the provisioning of environments can take time. You often need more environments than what's available by default, which requires going through support and sales processes. Having more stacks available by default would be beneficial. With Content Hub, there are issues with certain types of design and content incorporation, so more flexibility is needed.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using DXP from 2020 to 2024.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    There are not many issues, and Acquia uses a mailing list to communicate when there are problems. They also provide a status page to check the availability of solutions. They communicate about platform maintenance, and typically there is no action needed on our side.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Acquia DXP has high scalability because it is built on AWS. It allows you to scale the solution according to your needs. You can configure some aspects yourself on the cloud platform, and for specific needs, you might need to go through support.

    How are customer service and support?

    The support is normal, offering standard SLAs. When creating critical issues, a follow-up is needed on your side. Sometimes there are difficulties when dealing with critical issues due to the lack of a 24/7 available team. However, they are responsive and provide guidance.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup is not the easiest stack to set up initially. That said, it is well documented. For an experienced developer, the setup would be relatively straightforward and rated as a nine.

    What other advice do I have?

    For anyone evaluating this solution, it's important to have senior developers and senior people working with it, as junior developers may struggle with the setup. Having the right people on board is essential for enterprise projects. 

    I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. integrator
    PeerSpot user
    Lisa Stephens - PeerSpot reviewer
    Assistant Dean, SEAS Online at University at Buffalo (UB)
    Real User
    Top 20
    Nov 15, 2024
    Seamless global website management with robust design support
    Pros and Cons
    • "Every user is almost like a mini administrator, which spoke well to how they were connected globally."
    • "Once the site was originally developed, it needed to be transferred onto Acquia, which was quite a task."

    What is our primary use case?

    I was an Assistant Dean for Online Education at the School of Engineering. We used Acquia Digital Experience Platform for handling our website, flex space dot org. It is a free and open website of learning space exemplars that is available globally.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Acquia kept our website running flawlessly. Despite being a complex website used globally, it was stable and transparent for me. We had uninterrupted service and the site never went down.

    What is most valuable?

    Acquia was able to support everything our designer came up with. Every user is almost like a mini administrator, which spoke well to how they were connected globally.

    What needs improvement?

    Once the site was originally developed, it needed to be transferred onto Acquia, which was quite a task. There were challenges whenever Drupal changed its version, as we had to ensure everything still worked.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using Acquia for several years. It has been more than two years because we were running FlexSpace on it.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Stability-wise, it was pretty good. We had uninterrupted service and the site never went down.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It scaled as the user base grew, and there were no problems allowing for expansion.

    How are customer service and support?

    Their support team was outstanding. I had a consistent portfolio person to call when issues arose. Acquia takes good care of their employees as the point of contact changed only once or twice over the years.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was tricky as it involved a lot of information to move over to Acquia. Every time Drupal changed its version, we had to ensure everything continued to work seamlessly.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Acquia was part of a university-wide contract through SUNY, and they were very competitive in pricing. Education always seeks the most value for the dollar spent.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We looked at multiple website hosting services.

    What other advice do I have?

    Acquia's support platform is commendable. Having a consistent point of contact made any issues manageable, and I would recommend the product to others.

    I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    Software Associate at Wipro Limited
    Real User
    Top 10
    Dec 3, 2024
    Boosts site building speed with component reuse while facing e-commerce limitations
    Pros and Cons
    • "Acquia ensures we always have the latest releases available, which is a positive step forward in growth."
    • "The best feature of Acquia is its deployment capabilities and the DX product, which recently released a new framework called DX Acquia."
    • "In terms of scalability, Acquia is not suitable for e-commerce; it's more suited for content publishing and marketing websites."
    • "In terms of scalability, Acquia is not suitable for e-commerce; it's more suited for content publishing and marketing websites."

    What is our primary use case?

    I use Acquia primarily for front-end development and building reusable components. We employ a model approach with the paragraph model to build reusable components and layout builders. 

    We also utilize micro front-end concepts, tweak templating, and dynamic themes with personalization features, allowing users to configure their themes.

    What is most valuable?

    The best feature of Acquia is its deployment capabilities and the DX product, which recently released a new framework called DX Acquia. This framework enables faster site building, even for those who may not be technically strong, with pre-available theming and components. Acquia ensures we always have the latest releases available, which is a positive step forward in growth.

    What needs improvement?

    In terms of scalability, Acquia is not suitable for e-commerce; it's more suited for content publishing and marketing websites. Due to security concerns, Acquia and Drupal have not gained strength as fully transaction-based platforms.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have used Acquia for almost six years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I have not had any issues with the stability of Acquia.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Acquia is comfortable with content-type websites, but not very scalable for ecommerce. It works well for content-rich, marketing-focused sites with flexible content management. Initially, there was difficulty running setups locally, however, Acquia Cloud has simplified the process.

    How are customer service and support?

    Acquia's platform support is generally good. During past projects where we needed platform upgrades, their support team was helpful, even though sometimes our team had to be involved in fixing issues. 

    On a scale from one to ten, their support is about a seven.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    How was the initial setup?

    Initially, we faced challenges with setup due to Acquia's enabling of Docker and related toolkits. However, with Acquia Cloud, the setup has become much easier.

    What about the implementation team?

    We worked collaboratively with the Acquia platform team, particularly during platform upgrades and issue resolutions.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Acquia licensing works on a yearly subscription basis. The subscription amount is typically covered by the client as part of the agreement. I'm not sure about the current pricing, but it was a yearly web subscription.

    What other advice do I have?

    Overall, I would rate Acquia seven out of ten. I would recommend this product to other people, especially for smaller applications with limited budgets. The support is good, and having the owner of Drupal also own Acquia is advantageous.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user