Azure Site Recovery Reviews and Pricing

Fernando Cordero

Technology Officer at GikBrain

May 29, 2022

Download

Disaster recovery solution used for compliance and commitment in RTO and RPO

Pros and Cons

"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution mainly for compliance and to a DR and a commitment in RTO and RPO.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards.

What needs improvement?

The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for two years.

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Azure Site Recovery. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner

reviewer2256900

Design and Innovation Manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 19, 2024

Download

Provides disaster recovery and reduces cost with easy configuration

Pros and Cons

"It’s native to Azure and does exactly what it’s designed to do—recover one site to another without creating all the VMs on that site. This helps reduce costs on the secondary site."

What is our primary use case?

We use Azure Site Recovery primarily for disaster recovery to Azure or from Azure, while Veeam is used for data center recovery.

What is most valuable?

It’s native to Azure and does exactly what it’s designed to do—recover one site to another without creating all the VMs on that site. This helps reduce costs on the secondary site.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Azure Site Recovery as a partner for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There is no issues with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is suitable for large enterprises. It is scalable. These businesses have around 500 users.

How are customer service and support?

Support is wonderful.

How was the initial setup?

It is easy to configure.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is cost-effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The team conducted a thorough analysis before choosing Azure Site Recovery. They likely considered integration costs and various other factors.

What other advice do I have?

It seems to be seamless and is working perfectly. They’re integrating it with Azure Stack Hub, which we’ve also deployed as an on-premises solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner