Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service comparison

Microsoft and Nutanix are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6, while Nutanix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 9.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to Nutanix’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

3,171 Views
1,173 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Read 9 Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews

1,618 Views
631 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 14, 2024

Azure Site Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service compete in the disaster recovery domain. Nutanix is perceived as superior due to its advanced features and reliability, while Azure Site Recovery excels in pricing and customer support satisfaction.

Features: Azure Site Recovery integrates seamlessly into Microsoft's ecosystem, offering automation for recovery tasks, support for various operating systems, and automated file synchronization. Nutanix provides robust data replication, real-time monitoring, and a highly scalable environment suitable for complex needs.

Room for Improvement: Azure Site Recovery could improve by offering more competitive features with market leaders and reducing complexity for smaller customers. Users suggest Nutanix requires improvements in reducing the learning curve, enhancing integration options, and offering more cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery offers easy deployment within Microsoft environments, with responsive customer support highly rated by users familiar with Microsoft services. Nutanix offers a straightforward setup with dependable support but might involve a steeper learning curve for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery is noted for cost-effectiveness and a predictable pricing model, providing positive ROI feedback. Nutanix, despite higher initial costs, is valued for delivering ROI through extensive features and scalability, making it a worthwhile investment for large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery is 9.9%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is 5.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Site Recovery	9.9%
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service	5.9%
Other	84.2%

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Featured Reviews

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions

There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.

Read full review

AhmedKamal3

Regional Manager at VAD

Has improved cost efficiency and streamlined disaster recovery operations through flexible deployment options

The best features of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service are the high availability and failover capabilities. The majority of customers use the One-Click Disaster Recovery orchestration feature, and they are very satisfied with it. One-Click Disaster Recovery improves the overall business processes within an organization. I am very satisfied with its performance, and our customers are equally satisfied. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service's effectiveness in seamless failover to secondary sites is exceptional. The Recovery Point Objective is very small and fast. The metro availability and synchronous replication between different sites work very well. Disaster Recovery Orchestration is also good. The cloud disaster recovery as a service functionality is more than sufficient. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service's audit-proof reporting assists with compliance needs in Saudi Arabia, where we have different compliance certificates. It needs to work more to comply with all available certificates for compliance, including healthcare, financial sector, and Aramco-specific requirements. The positive impact includes cost efficiency, which is the most important point. The pay-as-you-grow model works effectively. The operation is good, and the flexibility for options such as on-premise synchronization, near synchronization, or cloud-based solutions is beneficial. Everything is available within the Nutanix platform, built-in, without extra complexity or fees.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."

"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

"It is a very stable product and very scalable."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding."

"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click."

"The best features of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service include real-time synchronization with the best RTO and RPO, inbuilt data protection with snapshot feature functionality, automatic DR site upgrades, ISO certified compliance reporting, and seamless integration with over 1800 certified software applications."

"The solution is stable."

"It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites."

"The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages."

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

"The immutable backup could be better."

"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site."

"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."

"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"The pricing could be better."

"It needs to work more to comply with all available certificates for compliance, including healthcare, financial sector, and Aramco-specific requirements."

"For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us."

"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."

"The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better."

"The solution needs improvement in cost."

"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."

"It needs to work more to comply with all available certificates for compliance, including healthcare, financial sector, and Aramco-specific requirements."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"They have a license to pay."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"It is a little bit cheaper than the other products in the market. It is affordable."

"Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."

"I always want it to be cheaper."

"One-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Site Recovery?

My main use case for Azure Site Recovery is that we are doing cross-region disaster recovery and processing.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Xi Leap?

Regarding the pricing of Nutanix compared to the competition, currently there is only one OEM competitor in VMware. There are other vendors, but the feature functionality is not available on their ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Xi Leap?

I previously faced some issues with Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service, but currently, we are not experiencing any compatibility issues. For future updates, incorporating AI capabilities would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Xi Leap?

The primary use cases for Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service involve selling to customers rather than for my organization. When we are building a disaster recovery site for our customers, along...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Lumen SafeHaven vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 11% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 6% of the time

Hitachi Vantara Data Protection as a Service vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 5% of the time

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

May 2026

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

April 2026

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report

Download Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Xi Leap

Overview

Azure Site Recovery ensures seamless disaster recovery with features like scalability, automated file synchronization, real-time dashboards, and secure processes. It achieves a 99.99% uptime SLA and is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly interface.

Azure Site Recovery is a comprehensive disaster recovery service featuring load-balancing, fast snapshots, and native Azure integration for reliable performance. It manages virtual machine synchronization with seamless failover and data consistency, aiding in reducing secondary site expenses. With its robust architecture, the service supports organizations in maintaining business continuity, meeting regulatory compliance, and minimizing downtime through regular failover drills. Its implementation often capitalizes on Azure's reliability, ensuring infrastructure uptime and reduced hardware requirements.

What are the essential features of Azure Site Recovery?

Scalability: Adjusts to varying data loads for optimized performance.
User-Friendly Console: Simplifies configuration and management processes.
Automated File Synchronization: Ensures data consistency across locations.
Real-Time Dashboards: Offers immediate insights into system health and recovery status.
Secure Processes: Protects data with advanced security protocols.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Azure Site Recovery?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces need for extensive hardware investments.
Reduced Downtime: Ensures quick recovery, maintaining business operations.
High SLA Guarantees: Provides reliability with 99.99% uptime.
Resource Efficiency: Saves time and effort in disaster recovery management.

Organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Site Recovery for its robust disaster recovery capabilities. The service navigates regulatory challenges with ease, aiding businesses in data duplication, VMware replication, and infrastructure backup. Its efficiency is leveraged to maintain critical systems during outages, facilitating business continuity and operational stability.

Microsoft

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service offers a comprehensive solution for protecting data, managing servers, and ensuring rapid recovery, enhancing stability and scalability for organizations relying on seamless failover and real-time synchronization.

Organizations using Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service benefit from a robust framework ensuring data security and ease of management. Its user-friendly interface, real-time synchronization, application awareness, and cluster management provide a comprehensive disaster recovery strategy. Automatic processes and seamless failover guarantee business continuity and data integrity, while compliance reporting and quick RTO/RPO bolster reliability and operational efficiency. Hyper-convergence further enhances management simplicity, ensuring rapid updates and patching capabilities.

What are the key features of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service?

User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies interaction and management.
Stability & Scalability: Enhances system reliability and growth potential.
Cluster Management: Efficiently manages multiple resources.
Real-Time Synchronization: Ensures continuous data reflection and recovery point accuracy.
Application Awareness: Integrates easily with business applications.
Seamless Failover: Provides uninterrupted service during failures.
Automatic Processes: Delivers efficient and streamlined operations.
Easy Database Integration: Facilitates connectivity with existing data systems.
High Availability: Keeps systems operational without disruption.
One-Click Disaster Recovery: Simplifies the recovery process with a single command.
Cost Efficiency: Balances affordability with extensive features.

What are the benefits and ROI users should look for?

ISO Certified Compliance Reporting: Ensures adherence to recognized standards.
Single-Console Visibility: Offers comprehensive monitoring from one interface.
Fast RTO/RPO: Minimizes recovery and operational downtime.
Metro Availability: Provides geographic redundancy and accessibility.

In industries utilizing Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service, organizations focus on safeguarding virtual machines and data centers. Hosting providers leverage site-to-site replication and compliance by scheduling recovery every three minutes, effectively maintaining data integrity and seamless orchestration across locations.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

April 2026

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.