Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
Apr 24, 2025
The price of Azure Site Recovery was reasonable compared to other data costs. It was not the expensive part of our costs, but, as always, there is room to make it cheaper.
The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective. Microsoft frequently restructures their pricing, causing us to adjust packages and subscriptions, which can be time-consuming.
Sometimes you only need to set up recovery cycles for one or two systems. However, in a large environment with hundreds or thousands of servers, replicating the entire setup in another region can be quite costly. It depends on your service needs and the specific solution you're implementing. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten where ten is highest.
IT infrastructure and services at United Bank for Africa
Real User
Top 10
May 13, 2024
The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten.
The pricing for Azure Site Recovery isn't fixed, and it depends on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. While it is not crystal clear, I have noticed it fluctuates with these variables. This flexibility makes it a bit challenging to estimate costs accurately, but I get that this is often the case with cloud services in general.
It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 16, 2020
There are different components in pricing and for each and every component you have to check the box and you have to look for options - check if they have a front end or back end kind of licensing, those are different types of licensing that can possibly be made simpler and probably cheaper.
Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in...
A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.
The price of Azure Site Recovery was reasonable compared to other data costs. It was not the expensive part of our costs, but, as always, there is room to make it cheaper.
The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective. Microsoft frequently restructures their pricing, causing us to adjust packages and subscriptions, which can be time-consuming.
Its bit costly for long term use
It is cost-effective.
Sometimes you only need to set up recovery cycles for one or two systems. However, in a large environment with hundreds or thousands of servers, replicating the entire setup in another region can be quite costly. It depends on your service needs and the specific solution you're implementing. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten where ten is highest.
The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten.
Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product.
The pricing for Azure Site Recovery isn't fixed, and it depends on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. While it is not crystal clear, I have noticed it fluctuates with these variables. This flexibility makes it a bit challenging to estimate costs accurately, but I get that this is often the case with cloud services in general.
I would rate it as a seven out of ten in terms of costliness.
They have a license to pay.
Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap. There is a monthly service cost attached to it.
The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive.
Licensing costs are consumption-based and although it's not cheap, it's not excessively expensive.
I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers.
The pricing should be free, and I think it should not be that expensive.
It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
There are different components in pricing and for each and every component you have to check the box and you have to look for options - check if they have a front end or back end kind of licensing, those are different types of licensing that can possibly be made simpler and probably cheaper.