AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service comparison

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (26th), Cloud Backup (19th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th)

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (4th)

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Managed services with seamless integration and good reliability

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Jaimin Mehta

Senior Server and Cloud Engineer at Ertech

Affordable, highly scalable, and outstanding support

For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us. Currently, Nutanix is providing the remote snapshot, and on the data center side, there is one cluster, and on the DR side, there is another cluster. We have synchronized both clusters with the same environment. For connectivity, we are using a Megaport link, and we have to pay a third party for that. If Nutanix can provide such connectivity, it will be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer service is quite helpful."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

"We have never had any issues with scalability."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"We went from an organization with minimal to no disaster recovery. I was able to spin up the disaster recovery environment with AWS rather quickly and meet business requirements."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use."

"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding."

"The solution is stable."

"It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful."

"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."

Cons

"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "

"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."

"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us."

"The pricing could be better."

"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."

"The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better."

"The solution needs improvement in cost."

"They need better reporting on the environment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"One-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received."

"Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."

"I always want it to be cheaper."

"It is a little bit cheaper than the other products in the market. It is affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as pu...

What do you like most about Nutanix Xi Leap?

The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Xi Leap?

Pricing is average. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where ten is good.

What needs improvement with Nutanix Xi Leap?

The solution needs improvement in cost.

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 21% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Zerto vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Zerto vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 38% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 23% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 13% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 10% of the time

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Competitors

Product Reports

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Download Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service product report

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Nutanix Xi Leap

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Nutanix Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) is a fully managed DR service that eliminates the need for a dedicated DR site, minimizes data loss and downtime, and helps organizations meet RTO/RPO SLAs confidently.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service