

Oracle Data Guard and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offer robust solutions for data protection and disaster recovery. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is often seen as the superior product due to its feature set and perceived value.
Features: Oracle Data Guard is praised for its automation, integration capabilities, and reliability in enterprise environments. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is valued for its scalability, ease of use across various platforms, and comprehensive feature set tailored to modern disaster recovery needs.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Oracle Data Guard could enhance its user experience by simplifying its complex setup, improving documentation, and offering better integration options. For AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, users recommend better reporting tools, more granular control over recovery settings, and enhanced customization features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Guard has a challenging deployment process that requires significant expertise, yet offers solid customer support post-deployment. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is known for its straightforward deployment process, complemented by responsive customer service, making it more user-friendly and efficient.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Guard is often viewed as costly but justified by its reliability and performance. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, although also considered somewhat expensive, is perceived to provide better ROI due to its scalable pricing model and broader feature set. Users investing in AWS generally feel they receive better value for their money.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
Oracle has the best support and a great knowledge center with a lot of accessible material for users and administrators.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
For the stability of Oracle Data Guard, I would rate it as the best.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
It could benefit from more automated features that notify via email if the disaster recovery or primary side fails.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
The simple Data Guard is free.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Active Data Guard is the most valuable feature. We use the secondary side for reporting purposes, which reduces the load on the primary side.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| Oracle Data Guard | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Oracle Data Guard ensures high availability, data protection, and disaster recovery for enterprise data. Data Guard provides a comprehensive set of services that create, maintain, manage, and monitor one or more standby databases to enable production Oracle databases to survive disasters and data corruptions. Data Guard can be used with traditional backup, restoration, and cluster techniques to provide a high level of data protection and data availability.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.