

HPE Zerto Software and Oracle Data Guard compete in the data recovery and protection market. Oracle Data Guard is often seen as the better option due to its comprehensive feature set, despite its higher price, while HPE Zerto Software is praised for cost-effectiveness and strong support.
Features: HPE Zerto Software offers continuous data protection, real-time replication, and near-zero RTO with automated failover. It supports multi-cloud environments, providing flexibility for data migrations. Oracle Data Guard features advanced data protection with standby databases, real-time replication, and snapshot functionality, ensuring high availability and data safety across enterprise environments.
Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance its cloud-based analytics engine, which external clients often require, and improve its orchestration services for Hyper-V environments. Oracle Data Guard can benefit from simplifying its complex deployment process, addressing high licensing costs, and improving its documentation for non-enterprise-level users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software is known for a simple deployment process and responsive support, appealing to firms needing quick implementation. Oracle Data Guard, while backed by comprehensive support, requires expert handling for integration with database ecosystems, which can complicate deployment.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software presents a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs and quick ROI through simplified maintenance. Oracle Data Guard, albeit more expensive, offers long-term value with its robust feature suite, making it appealing for organizations prioritizing comprehensive data protection.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
Oracle has the best support and a great knowledge center with a lot of accessible material for users and administrators.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
For the stability of Oracle Data Guard, I would rate it as the best.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
It could benefit from more automated features that notify via email if the disaster recovery or primary side fails.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
The simple Data Guard is free.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
Active Data Guard is the most valuable feature. We use the secondary side for reporting purposes, which reduces the load on the primary side.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 2.0% |
| Oracle Data Guard | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 92 |
| Large Enterprise | 195 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
Oracle Data Guard ensures high availability, data protection, and disaster recovery for enterprise data. Data Guard provides a comprehensive set of services that create, maintain, manage, and monitor one or more standby databases to enable production Oracle databases to survive disasters and data corruptions. Data Guard can be used with traditional backup, restoration, and cluster techniques to provide a high level of data protection and data availability.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.